CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2020; 29(01): 099-103
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702012
Section 2: Human Factors and Organizational Issues
Synopsis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Human Factors and Organizational Issues

Yalini Senathirajah
1   U. Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Dept. of Biomedical Informatics, Pittsburgh USA
,
Sylvia Pelayo
2   Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694, CIC-IT 1403 - Centre d’Investigation Clinique, Lille, France
,
Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Human Factors and Organizational Issues › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 August 2020 (online)

Summary

Objective: To select the best papers that made original and high impact contributions in the area of human factors and organizational issues in biomedical informatics in 2019.

Methods: A rigorous extraction process based on queries from Web of Science® and PubMed/Medline was conducted to identify the scientific contributions published in 2019 that address human factors and organizational issues in biomedical informatics. The screening of papers on titles and abstracts independently by the two editors led to a total of 30 papers. These papers were discussed for a selection of 15 finalist papers, which were then reviewed by the two editors and by three external reviewers from internationally renowned research teams.

Results: The query process resulted in 626 papers that reveal interesting and rigorous methods and important studies in human factors that move the field forward, particularly in clinical informatics and emerging technologies such as brain-computer interfaces. This year three papers were clearly outstanding and help advance the field. They provide examples of applying existing frameworks together in novel and highly illuminating ways, showing the value of theory development in human factors.

Conclusion: The selected papers make important contributions to human factors and organizational issues, expanding and deepening our knowledge of how to apply theory and applications of new technologies in health.

 
  • References

  • 1 Wang J, Liang H, Kang HY, Gong Y. Understanding Health Information Technology Induced Medication Safety Events by Two Conceptual Frameworks. Appl Clin Inform 2002; 10 (01) 158-67
  • 2 Sittig D, Singh H. A New Socio-technical Model for Studying Health Information Technology in Complex Adaptive Healthcare Systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (suppl 3): i68-i74
  • 3 Coiera E. A new informatics geography. Yearb Med Inform 2016; ;(01): 251-5
  • 4 Lee JJY, van Karnebeek CDM, Wasserman WW. Development and User Evaluation of a Rare Disease Gene Prioritization Workflow Based on Cognitive Ergonomics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (02) 124-33
  • 5 Patterson ES, Su G, Sarkar U. Reducing Delays to Diagnosis in Ambulatory Care Settings: A Macrocognition Perspective. Appl Ergon 2020; 82: 102965
  • 6 Carayon P, Hundt AS, Karsh BT, Gurses AP, Smith AM, Brennan PF. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15 (Suppl 1): i50-8
  • 7 Šumak B, Špindler M, Debeljak M, Heriko M, Pušnik M. An empirical evaluation of a hands-free computer interaction for users with motor disabilities. J Biomed Inform 2019; 96: 103249
  • 8 Chen AT, Wu S, Tomasino KN, Lattie EG, Mohr DC. A Multi-Faceted Approach to Characterizing User Behavior and Experience in a Digital Mental Health Intervention. J Biomed Inform 2019; 94: 103187
  • 9 Giordanengo A, Årsand E, Woldaregay AZ, Bradway M, Grottland A, Hartvigsen G. et al. Design and Prestudy Assessment of a Dashboard for Presenting Self-Collected Health Data of Patients With Diabetes to Clinicians: Iterative Approach and Qualitative Case Study. JMIR Diabetes 2019; 4 (03) e14002
  • 10 Year A, Muguerza J, Arbelaitz O, Perona I, Keers RN, Ashcroft DM. et al Modelling the interactive behaviour of users with a medication safety dashboard in a primary care setting. Int J Med Inform 2019; 129: 395-403
  • 11 Businger AC, Fuller TE, Schnipper JL, Rossetti SC, Schnock KO, Rozenblum R. et al. Lessons Learned Implementing a Complex and Innovative Patient Safety Learning Laboratory Project in a Large Academic Medical Center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (02) 301-7
  • 12 Richardson S, Feldstein D, McGinn T, Park LS, Khan S, Hess R. et al. Live Usability Testing of Two Complex Clinical Decision Support Tools: Observational Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2019; 6 (02) e12471
  • 13 Wang X, Kim TC, Hegde S, Hoffman DJ, Benda NC, Franklin ES. et al. Design and Evaluation of an Integrated, Patient-Focused Electronic Health Record Display for Emergency Medicine. Appl Clin Inform 2019; Aug; 10 (04) 693-706
  • 14 Setiawan MA, Zhou L, Alfikri Z, Saptono A, Fairman AD, Dicianno BE. et al. An Adaptive Mobile Health System to Support Self-Management for Persons With Chronic Conditions and Disabilities: Usability and Feasibility Studies. JMIR Form Res 2019; 3 (02) e12982
  • 15 Wooldridge AR, Carayon P, Hoonakker P, Hose BZ, Ross J, Kohler JE. et al. Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process: implications for multi-level awareness. Cogn Technol Work 2019; 21 (03) 397-416
  • 16 Cho H, Powell D, Pichon A, Kuhns LM, Garofalo R, Schnall R. Eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud as a novel approach for a usability evaluation. Int J Med Inform 2019; 129: 366-73
  • 17 Kutney Lee A, Sloane DM, Bowles KH, Burns LR, Aiken LH. Electronic Health Record Adoption and Nurse Reports of Usability and Quality of Care: The Role of Work Environment. Appl Clin Inform 2019; Jan; 10 (01) 129-39