PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2020; 29(01): 221-225
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701997
Section 10: Natural Language Processing
Synopsis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

A Year of Papers Using Biomedical Texts:

Findings from the Section on Clinical Natural Language Processing of the International Medical Informatics Association Yearbook
Cyril Grouin
1   Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, LIMSI, Orsay, France
,
Natalia Grabar
1   Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, LIMSI, Orsay, France
2   STL, CNRS, Université de Lille, Villeneuve-d’Ascq, France
,
Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Natural Language Processing › Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
21. August 2020 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Objectives: Analyze papers published in 2019 within the medical natural language processing (NLP) domain in order to select the best works of the field.

Methods: We performed an automatic and manual pre-selection of papers to be reviewed and finally selected the best NLP papers of the year. We also propose an analysis of the content of NLP publications in 2019.

Results: Three best papers have been selected this year including the generation of synthetic record texts in Chinese, a method to identify contradictions in the literature, and the BioBERT word representation.

Conclusions: The year 2019 was very rich and various NLP issues and topics were addressed by research teams. This shows the will and capacity of researchers to move towards robust and reproducible results. Researchers also prove to be creative in addressing original issues with relevant approaches.

Keywords

Natural Language Processing - social media - state-of-the-art review - Artificial Intelligence
 

  • References

  • 1 Nadkarni PM, Ohno-Machado L, Chapman WW. Natural Language Processing: an introduction. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18: 544-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Friedman C, Hripcsak G. Natural Language Processing and its future in medicine. Acad Med 1999; 74 (08) 890-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Guan J, Li R, Yu S, Zhang X. A method for generating synthetic electronic medical record text. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2019.
    PubMed
  • 4 Chen Y, Zhou C, Li T, Wu H, Zhao X, Ye K. et al. Named entity recognition from Chinese adverse drug event reports with lexical feature based BiLSTM-CRF and tri-training. J Biomed Inform 2019 Aug;96:103252.
    PubMed
  • 5 Zheng T, Gao Y, Wang F, Fan C, Fu X, Li M. et al. Detection of medical text semantic similarity based on convolutional neural network. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19 (01) 156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lerner I, Paris N, Tannier X. Terminologies augmented recurrent neural network model for clinical named entity recognition. J Biomed Inform 2020; 102: 103356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Viani N, Miller TA, Napolitano C, Priori SG, Savova GK, Bellazzi R. et al Supervised methods to extract clinical events from cardiology reports in italian. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Santiso S, Pérez A, Casillas A. Smoothing dense spaces for improved relation extraction between drugs and adverse reactions. Int J Med Inform 2019; 128: 39-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lavertu A, Altman RB. Redmed: Extending drug lexicons for social media applications. J Biomed Inform 2019; 99: 103307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hong N, Wen A, Stone DJ, Tsuji S, Kingsbury PR, Rasmusen LV. et al Developing a FHIR-based EHR phenotyping framework: A case study for identification of patients with obesity and multiple comorbidities from discharge summaries. J Biomed Inform 2019; 99: 103310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sterling NW, Patzer RE, Di M, Schrager JD. Prediction of emergency department patient disposition based on natural language processing of triage notes. Int J Med Inform 2019; 129: 184-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Liu F, Pradhan R, Druhl E, Freund E, Liu W, Sauer BC. et al. Learning to detect and understand drug discontinuation events from clinical narratives. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (10) 943-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Khadanga S, Aggrawa K, Joty S, Srivastava J. Using clinical notes with time series data for ICU management. In ACL editor. Proceedings of EMNLP 2019. Hongkong, China; 2019. p. 6431–6.
    PubMed
  • 14 Rosemblat G, Fiszman M, Shin D, Kilicoglu H. Towards a characterization of apparent contradictions in the biomedical literature using context analysis. J Biomed Inform 2019; 98: 103275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hahn U, Oleynik M. Medical information extraction in the age of deep learning: Methodological foundations and neural network applications. 2020 Yearb Med Inform (in press).
    PubMed
  • 16 Lee J, Yoon W, Kim S, Kim D, Kim S, Ho So C. et al. BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining. Bioinformatics 2019; 36 (04) 1234-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Si Y, Wang J, Xu H, Roberts K. Enhancing clinical concept extraction with contextual embeddings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (11) 1297-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tulkens S, Šuster S, Daelemans W. Unsupervised concept extraction from clinical text through semantic composition. J Biomed Inform 2019; 91: 103120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar