Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2020; 29(01): 032-043
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701987
Special Section: Ethics in Health Informatics
Survey
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Developments in Privacy and Data Ownership in Mobile Health Technologies, 2016-2019

Hannah K. Galvin
1   Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA, USA
2   Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
,
Paul R. DeMuro
3   Chief Legal Officer Health and Wellness, Royal Palm Companies, Miami, Florida
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 August 2020 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To survey international regulatory frameworks that serve to protect privacy of personal data as a human right as well as to review the literature regarding privacy protections and data ownership in mobile health (mHealth) technologies between January 1, 2016 and June 1, 2019 in order to identify common themes.

Methods: We performed a review of relevant literature available in English published between January 1, 2016 and June 1, 2019 from databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, as well as relevant legislative background material. Articles out of scope (as detailed below) were eliminated. We categorized the remaining pool of articles and discrete themes were identified, specifically: concerns around data transmission and storage, including data ownership and the ability to re-identify previously de-identified data; issues with user consent (including the availability of appropriate privacy policies) and access control; and the changing culture and variable global attitudes toward privacy of health data.

Results: Recent literature demonstrates that the security of mHealth data storage and transmission remains of wide concern, and aggregated data that were previously considered “de-identified” have now been demonstrated to be re-identifiable. Consumer-informed consent may be lacking with regard to mHealth applications due to the absence of a privacy policy and/or to text that is too complex and lengthy for most users to comprehend. The literature surveyed emphasizes improved access control strategies. This survey also illustrates a wide variety of global user perceptions regarding health data privacy.

Conclusion: The international regulatory framework that serves to protect privacy of personal data as a human right is diverse. Given the challenges legislators face to keep up with rapidly advancing technology, we introduce the concept of a “healthcare fiduciary” to serve the best interest of data subjects in the current environment.

Keywords

Privacy - confidentiality - telemedicine - Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act - international law

Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Alkhatib S, Waycott J, Buchanan G, Bosua R. Privacy and the Internet of Things (IoT) Monitoring Solutions of Older Adults: A Review. Comput Inf Syst Univ Melb 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Council of Europe. European Convention on Human Rights as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14 supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12, 13 and 16. European Court of Human Rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf. Published 2010.
    PubMed
  • 3 United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ . Published 1948
    PubMed
  • 4 Keller SA, Shipp S, Schroeder A. Does Big Data Change the Privacy Landscape? A Review of the Issues. Annu Rev Stat Its Appl 2016; 3 (01) 161-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zevon E, Patlak M, Nass S. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Clinical Application of Computational Methods in Precision Oncology: Proceedings of a Workshop. The National Academies Press; 2019 . https://doi/org/10.17226/s5404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kaplan B. How Should Health Data Be Used? Privacy, Secondary Use, and Big Data Sales. Cambridge Q Healthc Ethics 2016; 25 (02) 312-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 McGeveran W. The Duty of Data Security. Minn Law Rev 2019; 103: 1135
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.; 1996:Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936
    PubMed
  • 9 Mathews K. Proskauer on Privacy: A Guide to Privacy and Data Security Law in the Information Age. In: Practising Law Institute. 2nd ed. Proskauer; 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 US Constitution Amendment IV
    PubMed
  • 11 European Court of Human Rights. The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Council of Europe; 1998:ETS No. 155
    PubMed
  • 12 Warren S, Brandeis L. The Right to Privacy. Harv L Rev 1890; 4 (05) 193-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 European Court of Human Rights. Guide on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - Right to respect for private and family life. Council of Europe. https://www.refworld.org/docid/5a016ebe5.html . Published 2019
    PubMed
  • 14 Council of Europe. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as Amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14.; 1950. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3b04.html
    PubMed
  • 15 U.S. Department of Health Education & Welfare. Records, Computers and the Rights of Citizens; 1973. https://www.justice.gov/opcl/docs/rec-com-rights.pdf
    PubMed
  • 16 U.S. Privacy Act of 1974.; 1974:Pub L. No. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (2000) codified. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg1896.pdf
    PubMed
  • 17 Baker DB, Kaye J, Terry SF. Privacy, Fairness, and Respect for Individuals. EGEMS (WashDC) 2016 4. (2)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 European Parliament and of the Council. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Off J Eur Communities. 2016;OJ L 119/1:1-88. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
    PubMed
  • 19 Barrett C. Are the EU GDPR and the California CCPA becoming the de factor global standards for data privacy and protection?. TheSciTechLawyer 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Buttarelli G. The EU GDPR as a clarion call for a new global digital gold standard. LE CONTRÔLEUR EUROPÉEN DE LA PROTECTION DES DONNÉES. https://edps.europa.eu/press-publications/press-news/blog/eu-gdpr-clarion-call-new-global-digital-gold-standard_fr . Published 2016
    PubMed
  • 21 Kpadonou M. With the GDPR, Europe Shows the World the Way. Leaders League. https://www.leadersleague.com/en/news/with-the-gdpr-europe-shows-the-world-the-way . Published 2019
    PubMed
  • 22 Glassner U. Blockchain in EU E-Health – Blocked by the Barrier of Data Protection?. Compliance Elliance J 2018 4. (1)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Heinemann S. Data Power to the Patients! Patient-Driver Data Business, Not Data-Driven Patient Business. Compliance Elliance J 2018 4. (2)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Yang C, Lin H, Chang P, Jian W. Taiwan’s perspective on electronic medical records’ security and privacy protection: Lessons learned from HIPAA. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006; 82: 277-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Terry NP, Wiley LF. Liability for Mobile Health and Wearable Technologies. Vol 47; 2014
    PubMed
  • 26 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, Title XIII of Division A and Title IV of Division B of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA); 2009:Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 226 (Feb. 17, 2009)
    PubMed
  • 27 Armontrout J, Torous J, Fisher M, Drogin E, Gutheil T. Mobile Mental Health: Navigating New Rules and Regulations for Digital Tools. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2016 18. (10)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Prochaska JJ, Coughlin SS, Lyons EJ. Social Media and Mobile Technology for Cancer Prevention and Treatment. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ book Am Soc Clin Oncol Annu Meet 2017; 37: 128-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nahara K, Corbin B. Digital Health Regulatory Gaps in the United States. Compliance Elliance J 2018 4. (2)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Medical Device Overview. https://www.fda.gov/industry/regulated-products/medical-device-overview . Published 2018
    PubMed
  • 31 Kuhn A, Heinz MI. Digitization in the Health Sector in the Trade-Off Between Technical and Legislative Possibilities and Legal Limits According to German Law. Compliance Elliance J 2018 4. (2)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kao CK, Liebovitz DM. Consumer Mobile Health Apps: Current State, Barriers, and Future Directions. PM R 2017; 9 (5S): S106-S115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Shahmiri BS. Wearing Your Data on Your Sleeve: Wearables, the FTC, and the Privacy Implications of this New Technology. Texas Rev Entertain Sport Law 2016; 18 (01) 25-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Congress US. H.R. 493 (110th): Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008; 2008:L. 110-233, 122 Stat.881. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr493/summary
    PubMed
  • 35 California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018.; 2018:Cal. Civ. Code, §§1798.100 – 1798.199
    PubMed
  • 36 Senate Bill No. 1121, Chapter 735. California State Senate; 2018. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB1121
    PubMed
  • 37 Jerome J. California Privacy Law Shows Data Protection is on the March. Am Bar Assoc Antitrust 2018 33. (1)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 Part 4. Obligations Arising from Particular Transactions.; 2018:Cal. Civ. Code §1798.140(o)(1)
    PubMed
  • 39 Hirsch W, ML K, Hadgis K, Groebe L. The Proposed CCPA Regulations are Here: An Overview. Morgan Lewis. https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/the-proposed-ccpa-regulations-are-here-an-overview . Published 2019.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Gallagher B. Why Multinational Companies Need to Care About GDPR Compliance. IS Partners LLC. https://www.ispartnersllc.com/blog/multinational-companies-gdpr-compliance . Published 2018
    PubMed
  • 41 Congress TN. Law No. 13,709, of August 14, 2018 – Provides for the Protection of Personal Data and Changes Law No. 12,965, of April 23, 2014 (the “Brazilian Internet Law”); 2018
    PubMed
  • 42 “What is the principal data protection legislation?”. In: Relevant Legislation and Competent Authorities. BRAZIL, Chapter 9. http://www.iclg.com
    PubMed
  • 43 Brazil Adopts General Data Protection Law. Natl Law Rev 2019
    PubMed
  • 44 Congress TS and TH of R of the AN in. ACT 25,326, Personal Data Protection Act, Chapter 1, General Provisions; 2000
    PubMed
  • 45 Buerger S. How the GDPR changed the Argentina Personal Data Protection Act. Michalsons Pract Leg Solut 2017
    PubMed
  • 46 APEC Secretariat. APEC Privacy Framework. www.apec.org . Published 2005
    PubMed
  • 47 APEC Secretariat. APEC Privacy Framework (2015). www.apec.org . Published 2017
    PubMed
  • 48 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules System Program Requirements. https://cbprs.blob.core.windows.net/files/Cross_Border_Privacy_Rules_Program_Requirements.pdf
    PubMed
  • 49 Rotenberg M. Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. In: Privacy Law Sourcebook; 2002
    PubMed
  • 50 Reidenberg JR. Restoring Americans’ Privacy in Electronic Commerce. Berkeley Technol Law J 1999; 14: 771
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Recommendation of the Council Concerning Guidelines Governing the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data (2013); 2013. https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/oecd_privacy_framework.pdf
    PubMed
  • 52 Sullivan C. EU GDPR or APEC CBPR? A comparative analysis of the approach of the EU and APEC to cross border data transfers and protection of personal data in the IoT era. Comput Law Secur Rev 2019; 35 (04) 380-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Beyond the GDPR: What You Should Know about Japan’s Act on the Protection of Personal Information. Focal Point Insights 2018
    PubMed
  • 54 Personal Information Protection Commission J Amended Act on the Protection of Personal Information, Version 2; 2016
    PubMed
  • 55 Hayashi H. What is the principal data protection legislation? In: Relevant Legislation and Competent Authorities. JAPAN. Chapter 25
    PubMed
  • 56 Greenleaf G, Park WI. Korea’s new Act: Asia’s toughest data privacy law. Priv Laws Bus Int Rep 2012; ;(117): 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Personal Information Protection Act.; 2011: Chapter 1 General Provisions
    PubMed
  • 58 Creemers R, Triolo P, Webster G. Translation: Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China. DigiChina 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Bowman C, Li Y, Hou L. A Primer on China’s New Cybersecurity Law: Privacy, Cross-Border Transfer Requirements, and Data Localization. Proskauer 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Lable C, Sussman H, Xiao M, Chen D. An In-Depth Examination of China’s New Cybersecurity Law. Part I: Who Must Comply? Ropes Gray Alert, Priv Data Secur 2017
    PubMed
  • 61 Balke L. China’s New Cybersecurity Law and U.S-China Cybersecurity Issues. Santa Clara Law Rev 2018 48. (1)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Act on Promotion of Information and Communication Network Utilization and Information Protection; Chapter 1 General Provisions
    PubMed
  • 63 The Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA); 2013:Act No. 4 of 2013
    PubMed
  • 64 Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013. Gov Gazette. Repub South Africa 2013 58. 37067
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 The Republic of Uganda. The Data Protection and Privacy Act, 2019; 2019:ACT Supplements No. 9, Vol. CXXI No. 21
    PubMed
  • 66 Kenya Gazette Supplement. The Data Protection Act; 2019: No. 181, §24
    PubMed
  • 67 Development SAD of J and C. Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013 (Act. No. 4 of 2013); Regulations Relating to the Protection of Personal Information; 2018: No R1383
    PubMed
  • 68 Innes K. The Privacy Act is Changing on 22 February 2018 – This is not a drill! AUSTRAILIA 2018
    PubMed
  • 69 Office of Parliamentary Counsel CA. Healthcare Identifiers Act of 2010; 2017: No. 72, 2010. Compilation No. 14 date July 1, 2017
    PubMed
  • 70 Office of Parliamentary Counsel CA. Privacy Act 1988, Compilation No. 77; 2018: No. 119, 1988. Compilation No. 77 date February 22
    PubMed
  • 71 Legislation AGFR of Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records Act 2012: An Act to Provide for a System of Access to Electronic Health Records, and for Related Purposes; 2012: No. 63, 2012
    PubMed
  • 72 Office of Parliamentary Counsel CA. Privacy Act 1988, Compilation No. 81; 2019:No. 119. Compilation No. 81 date: August 13, 2019
    PubMed
  • 73 Privacy Guide: A guide to compliance with privacy laws in Australia. In: Justice Connect Not-for-Profit Law. Australia Not-for-Profit Law Guide; 2017
    PubMed
  • 74 Segura Anaya LH, Alsadoon A, Costadopoulos N, Prasad PWC. Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices. Sci Eng Ethics 2018; 24 (01) 1-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Bhuyan SS, Kim H, Isehunwa OO, Kumar N, Bhatt J, Wyant DK. et al. Privacy and security issues in mobile health: Current research and future directions. Health Policy Technol 2017; 6 (02) 188-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Spanakis EG, Santana S, Tsiknakis M, Marias K, Sakkalis V, Teixeira A. et al. Technology-based innovations to foster personalized healthy lifestyles and well-being:a targeted review. J Med Internet Res 2016 18. (6)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Roski J, Bo-Linn GW, Andrews TA. Creating value in health care through big data: Opportunities and policy implications. Health Aff 2014; 33 (07) 1115-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Els F, Cilliers L. Improving the information security of personal electronic health records to protect a patient’s health information. 2017 Conf Inf Commun Technol Soc ICTAS 2017 - Proc 2017;(March 2017)
    PubMed
  • 79 Katusiime J, Pinkwart N. A review of privacy and usability issues in mobile health systems: Role of external factors. Health Informatics J October 2017; 1460458217733121
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Wood PW, Boulanger P, Padwal RS. Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring: Rationale for Use, Required Elements, and Barriers to Implementation in Canada. Can J Cardiol 2017; 33 (05) 619-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Ippoliti NB, L’Engle K. Meet us on the phone: mobile phone programs for adolescent sexual and reproductive health in low-to-middle income countries. Reprod Health 2017; 14 (01) 11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Iglesias-Posadilla D, Gomez-Marcos V, Hernandez-Tejedor A. Apps and intensive care medicine. Med intensiva 2017; 41 (04) 227-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Torous J, Nicholas J, Larsen ME, Firth J, Christensen H. Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements. Evid Based Ment Health 2018; 21 (03) 116-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Treskes RW, van der Velde ET, Barendse R, Bruining N. Mobile health in cardiology: a review of currently available medical apps and equipment for remote monitoring. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016; 13 (09) 823-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Huckvale K, Prieto JT, Tilney M, Benghozi PJ, Car J. Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: A cross-sectional systematic assessment. BMC Med 2015; 13 (01) 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Calleja-Castillo JM, Gonzalez-Calderon G. WhatsApp in stroke systems: Current use and regulatory concerns. Front Neurol 2018; 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Mars M, Escott R. WhatsApp in clinical practice: A literature review. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016; 231: 82-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Tazegul G, Bozoglan H, Ogut TS, Balci MK. A clinician’s artificial organ? Instant messaging applications in medical care. Int J Artif Organs 2017; 40 (09) 477-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Papageorgiou A, Strigkos M, Politou E, Alepis E, Solanas A, Patsakis C. Security and Privacy Analysis of Mobile Health Applications: The Alarming State of Practice. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 9390-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Singh K, Drouin K, Newmark LP, Lee JH, Faxwaag A, Rozenblum R. et al. Many Mobile Health Apps Target High-Need, High-Cost Populations, But Gaps Remain. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35 (12) 2310-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Müthing J, Jäschke T, Friedrich CM. Client-Focused Security Assessment of Health Apps and Recommended Practices to Prevent or Mitigate Transport Security Issues. JMIR Health 2017; 5 (10) e147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Kotz D, Gunter CA, Kumar S, Weiner JP. Privacy and Security in Mobile Health: A Research Agenda. Computer (Long Beach Calif) 2016; 49 (06) 22-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Tofighi B, Abrantes A, Stein MD. The Role of Technology-Based Interventions for Substance Use Disorders in Primary Care: A Review of the Literature. Med Clin North Am 2018; 102 (04) 715-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Mamlin BW, Tierney WM. The Promise of Information and Communication Technology in Healthcare: Extracting Value from the Chaos. Am J Med Sci 2016; 351 (01) 59-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Balthazar P, Harri P, Prater A, Safdar NM. Protecting Your Patients’ Interests in the Era of Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, and Predictive Analytics. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (03) 580-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Davis J, Osoba O. Privacy Preservation in the Age of Big Data: A Survey. Priv Preserv Age Big Data A Surv. 2016; 1-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Mohr DC, Zhang M, Schueller SM. Personal Sensing: Understanding Mental Health Using Ubiquitous Sensors and Machine Learning. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017; 13: 23-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Sweeney L. Simple demographics often identify people uniquely. Carnegie Mellon Univ Data Priv Work Pap 3 Pittsburgh 2000:1-34. http://dataprivacylab.org/projects/identifiability/paper1.pdf
    PubMed
  • 99 Sweeney L, Yoo JS, Perovich L, Boronow KE, Brown P, Brody JG. Re-identification Risks in HIPAA Safe Harbor Data: A study of data from one environmental health study. Technol Sci 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 de Montjoye YA, Radaelli L, Singh VK, Pentland AS. Unique in the shopping mall: On the reidentifiability of credit card metadata. Science 2015; 347 6221 536-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Rocher L, Hendrickx JM, de Montjoye YA. Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models. Nat Commun 2019; 10 (01) 3069
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Bakken S, Marden S, Arteaga SS. et al. Behavioral Interventions Using Consumer Information Technology as Tools to Advance Health Equity. Am J Public Health 2019; 109 (S1): S79-S85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Chung J, Demiris G, Thompson HJ. Ethical Considerations Regarding the Use of Smart Home Technologies for Older Adults: An Integrative Review. Annu Rev Nurs Res 2016; 34: 155-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Mense A, Steger S, Sulek M, Jukicsunaric D, Mészáros A. Analyzing privacy risks of mhealth applications. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016; 221: 41-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Parker L, Karliychuk T, Gillies D, Mintzes B, Raven M, Grundy Q. A health app developer’s guide to law and policy: a multi-sector policy analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17 (01) 141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Rosenfeld L, Torous J, Vahia IV. Data Security and Privacy in Apps for Dementia : An Analysis of Existing Privacy Policies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019; 25 (08) 873-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Sunyaev A, Dehling T, Taylor PL, Mandl KD. Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2015; 22 (e1) e28-e33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Minen MT, Stieglitz EJ, Sciortino R, Torous J. Privacy Issues in Smartphone Applications: An Analysis of Headache/Migraine Applications. Headache 2018; 58 (07) 1014-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Bert F, Passi S, Scaioli G, Gualano MR, Siliquini R. There comes a baby! What should i do? Smartphones’ pregnancy-related applications: A web-based overview. Health Informatics J 2016; 22 (03) 608-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Blenner SR, Kollmer M, Rouse AJ, Daneshvar N, Williams C, Andrews LB. Privacy policies of android diabetes apps and sharing of health information: In reply. JAMA 2016; 315 (10) 1053-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Huckvale K, Torous J, Larsen ME. Assessment of the Data Sharing and Privacy Practices of Smartphone Apps for Depression and Smoking Cessation. JAMA Netw open 2019; 2 (04) e192542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 O’Loughlin K, Neary M, Adkins EC, Schueller SM. Reviewing the data security and privacy policies of mobile apps for depression. Internet Interv 2019; 15: 110-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Robillard JM, Feng TL, Sporn AB, Lai JA, Lo C, Ta M. et al Availability, readability, and content of privacy policies and terms of agreements of mental health apps. Internet Interv 2019; 17: 100243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Leibenger D, Möllers F, Petrlic A, Petrlic R, Sorge C. Privacy Challenges in the Quantified Self Movement – An EU Perspective. Proc Priv Enhancing Technol 2016; 2016 (04) 315-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Bachiri M, Idri A, Fernandez-Aleman JL, Toval A. Evaluating the Privacy Policies of Mobile Personal Health Records for Pregnancy Monitoring. J Med Syst 2018; 42 (08) 144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Hutton L, Price BA, Kelly R, McCormick C, Bandara AK, Hatzakis T. et al. Assessing the Privacy of mHealth Apps for Self-Tracking: Heuristic Evaluation Approach. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2018; 6 (10) e185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Powell AC, Singh P, Torous J. The Complexity of Mental Health App Privacy Policies: A Potential Barrier to Privacy. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2018; 6 (07) e158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Bruggemann T, Hansen J, Dehling T, Sunyaev A. An Information Privacy Risk Index for Health. Apps 2016; 8319 (September)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Glenn T, Monteith S. Privacy in the Digital World: Medical and Health Data Outside of HIPAA Protections. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2014 16. (11)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Martinez-Martin N, Kreitmair K. Ethical Issues for Direct-to-Consumer Digital Psychotherapy Apps: Addressing Accountability, Data Protection, and Consent. JMIR Ment Health 2018; 5 (02) e32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Schairer CE, Rubanovich CK, Bloss CS. How could commercial terms of use and privacy policies undermine informed consent in the age of mobile health?. AMA J Ethics 2018; 20 (09) E864-E872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Fernandez-Luque L, Staccini P. All that Glitters Is not Gold: Consumer Health Informatics and Education in the Era of Social Media and Health Apps. Findings from the Yearbook 2016 Section on Consumer Health Informatics. Yearb Med Inform 2016; ;(1): 188-193 . http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med12&AN=27830250
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Edwards-Stewart A, Alexander C, Armstrong CM, Hoyt T, O’Donohue W. Mobile applications for client use: Ethical and legal considerations. Psychol Serv 2019; 16 (02) 281-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Parker L, Halter V, Karliychuk T, Grundy Q. How private is your mental health app data? An empirical study of mental health app privacy policies and practices. Int J Law Psychiatry 2019; 64: 198-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Ostherr K, Borodina S, Bracken RC, Lotterman C, Storer E, Williams B. Trust and privacy in the context of user-generated health data. Big Data Soc 2017; 4 (01) 205395171770467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Owen JE, Kuhn E, Jaworski BK, McGee-Vincent P, Juhasz K, Hoffman JE. et al VA mobile apps for PTSD and related problems: public health resources for veterans and those who care for them. mHealth 2018; 4: 28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 127 Perez S. Hundreds Of Apps Banned From App Store For Accessing Users’ Personal Information. TechCruch 2015. https://techcrunch.com/2015/10/19/hundreds-of-apps-banned-from-app-store-for-accessing-users-personal-information/
    PubMed
  • 128 Office of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology. 2016 Model Privacy Notice. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/2016_model_privacy_notice.pdf . Published 2016
    PubMed
  • 129 Moore D, Niemi M. The Sharing of Personal Health Data – A Review of the Literature; 2016;(June)
    PubMed
  • 130 Perez AJ, Zeadally S. Privacy Issues and Solutions for Consumer Wearables. IT Prof 2018; 20 (04) 46-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 Liddle J, Burdon M, Ireland D, Carter A, Knuepffer C, Milevskiy N. et al. Balancing Self-Tracking and Surveillance: Legal, Ethical and Technological Issues in Using Smartphones to Monitor Communication in People with Health Conditions. J Law Med 2016; 24 (02) 387-97 . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30137711
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Mortenson WB, Sixsmith A, Beringer R. No Place Like Home? Surveillance and What Home Means in Old Age. Can J Aging 2016; 35 (01) 103-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Sánchez D, Viejo A. Personalized privacy in open data sharing scenarios. Online Inf Rev 2017; 41 (03) 298-310 . http://10.0.4.84/OIR-01-2016-0011%0A http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=llf&AN=123252056&site=ehost-live
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Haluza D, Naszay M, Stockinger A, Jungwirth D. Prevailing opinions on connected health in Austria: Results from an online survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016 13. (8)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Bucci S, Morris R, Berry K, Berry N, Haddock G, Barrowclough C. et al. Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis. JMIR Ment Health 2018;5(4):e10091.
    PubMed
  • 136 McClure JB, Hartzler AL, Catz SL. Design Considerations for Smoking Cessation Apps: Feedback From Nicotine Dependence Treatment Providers and Smokers. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2016; 4 (01) e17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Saberi P, Siedle-Khan R, Sheon N, Lightfoot M. The Use of Mobile Health Applications Among Youth and Young Adults Living with HIV: Focus Group Findings. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2016; 30 (06) 254-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Torous J, Wisniewski H, Liu G, Keshavan M. Mental Health Mobile Phone App Usage, Concerns, and Benefits Among Psychiatric Outpatients: Comparative Survey Study. JMIR Ment Health 2018; 5 (04) e11715
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 139 Biswas KK, Hossain A, Chowdhury R, Andersen K, Sultana S, Shahidullah SM. et al. Using mHealth to Support Postabortion Contraceptive Use: Results From a Feasibility Study in Urban Bangladesh. JMIR Form Res 2017; 1 (01) e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 140 Eckersberger E, Pearson E, Andersen K, Hossain A, Footman K, Biswas KK. et al. Developing mHealth Messages to Promote Postmenstrual Regulation Contraceptive Use in Bangladesh: Participatory Interview Study. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2017; 5 (12) e174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 141 Hoque MR, Bao Y, Sorwar G. Investigating factors influencing the adoption of e-Health in developing countries: A patient’s perspective. Informatics Health Soc Care 2017; 42 (01) 1-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 142 Brody C, Tatomir B, Sovannary T, Pal K, Mengsrun S, Dionosio J. et al Mobile phone use among female entertainment workers in Cambodia: an observation study. mHealth 2017; 3: 3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 143 Feinberg L, Menon J, Smith R, Rajeev JG, Kumar RK, Banerjee A. Potential for mobile health (mHealth) prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Kerala: A population-based survey. Indian Heart J 2017; 69 (02) 182-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 144 Leenan LAM, Wijnen BFM, de Kinderen RJA, van Heugten CM, Evers SMAA, Majoie MHJM. Are people with epilepsy using eHealth-tools?. Epilepsy Behav 2016; 64: 268-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 145 van Kerkhof LWM, van der Laar CWE, de Jong C, Weda M, Hegger I. Characterization of Apps and Other e-Tools for Medication Use: Insights Into Possible Benefits and Risks. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2016; 4 (02) e34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 146 de Korte EM, Wiezer N, Janssen JH, Vink P, Kraaij W. Evaluating an mHealth App for Health and Well-Being at Work: Mixed-Method Qualitative Study. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2018; 6 (03) e72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 147 Cheung C, Bietz MJ, Patrick K, Bloss CS. Privacy attitudes among early adopters of emerging health technologies. PLoS One 2016; 11 (11) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 148 Zhao Y, Zhu X, Perez AE, Zhang W, Shi A, Zhang Z. et al. MHealth approach to promote Oral HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men in China: a qualitative description. BMC Public Health 2018; 18 (01) 1146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 149 Ronen K, Unger JA, Drake AL, Perrier T, Akinyi P, Osborn L. et al. SMS messaging to improve ART adherence: perspectives of pregnant HIV-infected women in Kenya on HIV-related message content. AIDS Care 2018; 30 (04) 500-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 150 Stawarz K, Preist C, Tallon D, Wiles N, Coyle D. User Experience of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Apps for Depression: An Analysis of App Functionality and User Reviews. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (06) e10120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 151 Campbell JI, Aturinda I, Mwesigwa E, Burns B, Santorino D, Haberer JE. et al. The Technology Acceptance Model for Resource-Limited Settings (TAM-RLS): A Novel Framework for Mobile Health Interventions Targeted to Low-Literacy End-Users in Resource-Limited Settings. AIDS Behav 2017; 21 (11) 3129-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 152 Marent B, Henwood F, Darking M. Development of an mHealth platform for HIV Care: Gathering User Perspectives Through Co-Design Workshops and Interviews. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2018; 6 (10) e184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 153 van der Kop M, Muhula S, Ekström AM, Jongbloed K, Smillie K, Abunah B. et al. Participation in a mobile health intervention trial to improve retention in HIV care: does gender matter?. J Telemed Telecare 2017; 23 (02) 39-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 154 Bauer AM, Iles-Shih M, Ghomi RH, Rue T, Grover T, Kincler N. et al Acceptability of mHealth augmentation of Collaborative Care: A mixed methods pilot study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2018; 51: 22-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 155 Nhavoto JA, Gronlund A, Klein GO. Mobile health treatment support intervention for HIV and tuberculosis in Mozambique: Perspectives of patients and healthcare workers. PLoS One 2017; 12 (04) e0176051
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 156 Moodley J, Constant D, Botha MH, van der Merwe FH, Edwards A, Momberg M. Exploring the feasibility of using mobile phones to improve the management of clients with cervical cancer precursor lesions. BMC Womens Health 2019; 19 (01) 2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 157 Hendrikoff L, Kambeitz-Ilankovic L, Pryss R, Senner F, Falkai P, Pogarell O. et al Prospective acceptance of distinct mobile mental health features in psychiatric patients and mental health professionals. J Psychiatr Res 2019; 109: 126-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 158 Liu Y, Wang L, Chang P, Lamb KV, Cui Y, Wua Y. What features of smartphone medication applications are patients with chronic diseases and caregivers looking for?. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016; 225: 515-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 159 Puri A, Kim B, Nguyen O, Stolee P, Tung J, Lee J. User Acceptance of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Mixed Method Study. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2017; 5 (11) e173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 160 Deng Z, Hong Z, Ren C, Zhang W, Xiang F. What Predicts Patients’ Adoption Intention Toward mHealth Services in China: Empirical Study. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2018; 6 (08) e172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 161 Rasche P, Wille M, Bröhl C. , et al. Prevalence of health app use among older adults in Germany: National survey. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (01) 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 162 Abelson JS, Kaufman E, Symer M, Peters A, Charlson M, Yeo H. Barriers and benefits to using mobile health technology after operation: A qualitative study. Surgery 2017; 162 (03) 605-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 163 Montgomery F. Cf. speech of the president of the German Medical Association and the German Physicians’ Board, Prof. Dr. Frank Ulrich Montgomery, Opening of the 121st German Physicians’ Board in the Steigerwaldstadion Erfurt on the 8th of May 2018. https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/pdf-Ordner/121.DAET/Eroeffnungsrede_Prof._Montgomery.pdf . Published 2018
    PubMed
  • 164 Mendelson D, Mendelson D. Legal protections for personal health information in the age of Big Data — a proposal for regulatory framework. Ethics, Med Public Heal 2017; 3 (01) 37-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 165 Lhotska L, Cheshire P, Pharow P, Macku D. Non-technical issues in design and development of personal portable devices. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016; 221: 46-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 166 Barcelo R, Ciesielka AYE. The Planet49 Decision: Key Takeaways. LexBlog https://www.lexblog.com/2019/10/01/the-planet49-decision-key-takeaways/ . Published 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 167 Dobkin A. Information Fiduciaries in Practice: Data Privacy and User Expectations. Berkeley Technol Law J 2018; 33 (01) 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 168 Balkin JM. Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment. UC Davis Law Rev 2016; 49 (04) 1183
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 169 De Muro P, Petersen C. Managing Privacy and Data Sharing Through the Use of Health Care Information Fiduciaries. Stud Heal Technol Inform 2019; 265: 157-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 170 De Muro P, Galvin H. Patient-Generated Health Data and Healthcare Information Fiduciaries. In: Emerging Technologies in Healthcare - Legal, Ethical & Social Aspects. London, UK; 2019
    PubMed
  • 171 Nicholas J, Boydell K, Christensen H. Beyond symptom monitoring: Consumer needs for bipolar disorder self-management using smartphones. Eur Psychiatry 2017; 44: 210-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 172 Nicholas J, Huckvale K, Larsen ME, Basu A, Batterham PJ, Shaw F. et al. Issues for eHealth in psychiatry: Results of an expert survey. J Med Internet Res 2017 19. (2)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 173 Nicholas J, Fogarty AS, Boydell K, Christensen H. The reviews are in: A qualitative content analysis of consumer perspectives on apps for bipolar disorder. J Med Internet Res 2017 19. (4)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 174 Muigg D, Kastner P, Modre-Osprian R, Haluza D, Duftschmid G. Is Austria ready for Telemonitoring? A readiness assessment among doctors and patients in the field of diabetes. Stud Health Technol Inform 2018; 248: 322-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 175 Duftschmid G, Modre-Osprian R, Muigg D, Haluza D, Kastner P. Readiness to use telemonitoring in diabetes care: a cross-sectional study among Austrian practitioners. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 7: 1-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 176 Baskerville NB, Dash D, Wong K, Shuh A, Abramowicz A. Perceptions Toward a Smoking Cessation App Targeting LGBTQ+ Youth and Young Adults: A Qualitative Framework Analysis of Focus Groups. JMIR Public Heal Surveill 2016; 2 (02) e165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 177 Basterfield A, Dimitropoulos G, Bills D, Cullen O, Freeman VE. “I would love to have online support but I don’t trust it”: Positive and negative views of technology from the perspective of those with eating disorders in Canada. Health Soc Care Community 2018; 26 (04) 604-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 178 Woldeyohannes HO, Ngwenyama OK. Factors Influencing Acceptance and Continued Use of mHealth Apps. 2017 10293. 239-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 179 Li H, Wu J, Gao Y, Shi Y. Examining individuals’ adoption of healthcare wearable devices: An empirical study from privacy calculus perspective. Int J Med Inform 2016; 88 (555) 8-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 180 Goetz M, Müller M, Matthies LM, Hansen J, Doster A, Szabo A. et al. Perceptions of Patient Engagement Applications During Pregnancy: A Qualitative Assessment of the Patient’s Perspective. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2017; 5 (05) e73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 181 Hartmann R, Sander C, Lorenz N, Böttger D, Hegerl U. Utilization of patient-generated data collected through mobile devices: Insights from a survey on attitudes toward mobile self-monitoring and self-management apps for depression. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (04) 1-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 182 Holderried M, Ernst C, Holderried F, Rieger M, Blumenstock G, Tropitzsch A. The potential of eHealth in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery: patients’ perspectives. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (07) 2933-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 183 Kessel KA, Vogel MM, Schmidt-Graf F, Combs SE. Mobile Apps in Oncology: A Survey on Health Care Professionals’ Attitude Toward Telemedicine, mHealth, and Oncological Apps. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (11) e312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 184 Rasche P, Wille M, Bröhl C, Theis S, Schäfer K, Knobe M. et al. Prevalence of Health App Use Among Older Adults in Germany: National Survey. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2018; 6 (01) e26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 185 Griebel L, Kolominsky-Rabas P, Schaller S, Siudyka J, Sierpinski R, Papapavlou D. et al. Acceptance by laypersons and medical professionals of the personalized eHealth platform, eHealthMonitor. Inform Health Soc Care 2017; 42 (03) 232-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 186 Van Velsen L, Wildevuur S, Flierman I, Van Schooten B, Tabak M, Hermens H. Trust in telemedicine portals for rehabilitation care: An exploratory focus group study with patients and healthcare professionals eHealth/ telehealth/ mobile health systems. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 187 Hossain I, Lim ZZ, Ng JJ Le, Koh WJ, Wong PS. Public attitudes towards mobile health in Singapore: a cross-sectional study. mHealth 2018; 4: 41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 188 Cilliers L. Wearable devices in healthcare: Privacy and information security issues. Health Inf Manag 2019; 1833358319851684
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 189 Aicken CRH, Fuller SS, Sutcliffe LJ, Estcourt CS, Gkatzidou V, Oakeshott P. et al. Young people’s perceptions of smartphone-enabled self-testing and online care for sexually transmitted infections: Qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health 2016; 16 (01) 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 190 Berry N, Lobban F, Bucci S. A qualitative exploration of service user views about using digital health interventions for self-management in severe mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19 (01) 35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 191 Burrows A, Coyle D, Gooberman-Hill R. Privacy, boundaries and smart homes for health: An ethnographic study. Health Place 2018; 50: 112-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 192 Greenfield R, Busink E, Wong CP, Riboli-Sasco E, Greenfield G, Majeed A. et al. Truck drivers’ perceptions on wearable devices and health promotion: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2016; 16 (01) 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 193 Griffin N, Kehoe M. A questionnaire study to explore the views of people with multiple sclerosis of using smartphone technology for health care purposes. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 40 (12) 1434-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 194 Perski O, Blandford A, Ubhi HK, West R, Michie S. Smokers’ and drinkers’ choice of smartphone applications and expectations of engagement: a think aloud and interview study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17 (01) 25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 195 Abelson JS, Kaufman E, Symer M, Peters A, Charlson M, Yeo H. Barriers and benefits to using mobile health technology after operation: A qualitative study. Surgery 2017; 162 (03) 605-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 196 Bauer AM, Rue T, Munson SA, Ghomi RH, Keppel GA, Cole AM. et al. Patient-oriented health technologies: Patients’ perspectives and use. J Mob Technol Med 2017; 6 (02) 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 197 Bietz MJ, Bloss CS, Calvert S, Godino JG, Gregory J, Claffey MP. et al. Opportunities and challenges in the use of personal health data for health research. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (e1): 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 198 Garg SK, Lyles CR, Ackerman S, Handley MA, Schillinger D, Gourley G. et al. Qualitative analysis of programmatic initiatives to text patients with mobile devices in resource-limited health systems. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 199 Lipschitz J, Miller CJ, Hogan TP, Burdick KE, Lippin-Foster R, Simon SR. et al. Adoption of Mobile Apps for Depression and Anxiety: Cross-Sectional Survey Study on Patient Interest and Barriers to Engagement. JMIR Ment Health 2019; 6 (01) e11334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 200 Lowens B, Motti VG, Caine K. Wearable Privacy: Skeletons in the Data Closet. Proc - 2017 IEEE Int Conf Healthc Informatics, ICHI 2017. 2017:295–304
    PubMed
  • 201 Nicholas J, Shilton K, Schueller SM, Gray EL, Kwasny MJ, Mohr DC. The Role of Data Type and Recipient in Individuals’ Perspectives on Sharing Passively Collected Smartphone Data for Mental Health: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2019; 7 (04) e12578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 202 Ofili EO, Pemu PE, Quarshie A. Democratizing Discovery Health with N = Me. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2018; ;(129): 215-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 203 Place S, Blanch-Hartigan D, Rubin C, Gorrostieta C, Mead C, Kane J. et al. Behavioral Indicators on a Mobile Sensing Platform Predict Clinically Validated Psychiatric Symptoms of Mood and Anxiety Disorders. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (03) e75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 204 Sedlander E, Barboza KC, Jensen A, Skusky N, Bennett K, Sherman S. et al. Veterans’ Preferences for Remote Management of Chronic Conditions. Telemed J E Health 2018; 24 (03) 229-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 205 Serrano KJ, Yu M, Riley WT, Patel V, Hughes P, Marchesini K. et al. Willingness to exchange health information via mobile devices: Findings from a population-based survey. Ann Fam Med 2016; 14 (01) 34-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 206 Zhou L, Bao J, Watzlaf V, Parmanto B. Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2019; 7 (04) e11223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar