Freedom of Master's Degree Students to Study in Health Curricula: Switching to Optimized Blended Learning as a Solution!

Summary

Objectives: The Grenoble (France) Master's degree in health includes 17 sub-specialty programs, 120 separate teaching units (TUs) and caters for up to 400 students per year. We present the pedagogical transition to blended learning based on flipped classroom initiated in 2010 to overcome the pedagogical limitations of classical lectures.

Methods: The pedagogical organization of each TU is based on the weekly and sequential implementation of five sequences. The first three sequences comprise the learning stages of (1) self-learning on knowledge capsules, (2) interactive on-line questions and votes of interest, and (3) interactive on-site training and explanation meetings. The last two sequences include the evaluation stages with (4) positioning tests, and (5) an anonymous evaluation of the TU allowing access to personalized follow-ups. This pedagogical sequence is completed with a final certification on a tablet computer.

Results: The systematic evaluation and debriefing sessions of TUs gave us a clear SWOT vision of the revised Master's degree in health. The feedback was very positive from students, teachers, and the institution, which encourages us to move forward in this transition. Nonetheless, some of this positive feedback was unexpected, such as the ease of managing mobile learners (e.g. Erasmus, International internship) or personalized reinforcement.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that a switch to blended learning is feasible in a large Master program, with improvements on student/teacher equity and for the institution.

Keywords

Models - educational - health education - formative feedback - academic performance - distance learning

• References

• 1 Alpes UG. Master ingénierie de la santé - Université Grenoble Alpes - Accueil [Internet]. Master ingénierie de la santé. [cited 28 Oct 2019]. Available from: https://master-ingenierie-sante.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/accueil-279544.kjsp?RH=5265593707555119
• 2 Mazur E. Peer instruction: a user's manual. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall; 1997
• 3 Mayer RE. Multimedia learning. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001
• 4 Strayer J. The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: a comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system [Internet]. The Ohio State University; 2007. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1189523914
• 5 Houssein S, Di Marco L, Schwebel C, Luengo V, Morand P, Gillois P. Consequences of Switching to Blended Learning: The Grenoble Medical School Key Elements. Stud Health Technol Inform 2018; 247: 356-60
• 6 Stuart J, Rutherford RJ. Medical student concentration during lectures. Lancet 1978; 2 (8088): 514-516
• 7 Huxham GJ, Naeraa N. Is Bloom's Taxonomy relected in the response pattern to MCQ items?. Med Educ 1980; 14 (01) 23-26
• 8 Car J, Carlstedt-Duke J, Tudor Car L, Posadzki P, Whiting P, Zary N. , et al. Digital Education in Health Professions: The Need for Overarching Evidence Synthesis. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (02) e12913
• 9 Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (01) e2
• 10 Kong Y, Seo YS, Zhai L. Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education 2018; 123: 138-49
• 11 Joseph LM, Alber-Morgan S, Cullen J, Rouse C. The Effects of Self-Questioning on Reading Comprehension: A Literature Review. Reading & Writing Quarterly 2016; 32 (02) 152-73
• 12 Brusamento S, Kyaw BM, Whiting P, Li L, Tudor Car L. Digital Health Professions Education in the Field of Pediatrics: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (09) e14231
• 13 Kenney J, Newcombe E. Adopting a Blended Learning Approach: Challenges Encountered and Lessons Learned in an Action Research Study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 2011; 15 (01) 45-57
• 14 Nissen E. Quelles aides les formations hybrides en langues proposent-elles à l'apprenant pour favoriser son autonomie? Alsic Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d'Information et de Communication [Internet] 2007;10(1) [cited 14 Nov 2019]. Available from: http://journals.openedition.org/alsic/617
• 15 Buzzetto-More NA, Guy R. Incorporating the Hybrid Learning Model into Minority Education at a Historically Black University. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 2006; 1 (05) 1-153
• 16 Gillois P, Bosson JL, Genty C, Vuillez JP, Romanet JP. The impacts ofblended learning design in first year medical studies. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 210: 607-11
• 17 De Stercke J. Une classe renversée à l'Ecole du Feu: récit d'une expérience pédagogique en formation professionnelle. [Flipped classroom at the firefighters’ school : the account of a pedagogical experience in professional training.]. Formation et Profession 2015; 23: 83-6
• 18 Charles M. Do-It-Yourself Corpora in the Eap Classroom: Students, Teachers, and Pedagogy. In: 2017. p. 107-23