Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2020; 14(02): 315-326
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701907
Review Article

Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Coverage of Gingival Recession: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Miguel Augusto Riquelme Rodas
1   Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Bruna Luísa de Paula
1   Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Victor Fabrizio Cabrera Pazmiño
2   Department of prosthesis, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies (HRAC), University of São Paulo (USP), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Flávia Ferraz dos Santos Lot Vieira
1   Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior
1   Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Elcia Maria Varize Silveira
1   Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes versus subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs) in the coverage of Miller class I and II gingival recessions. After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, the quality of seven articles (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.9) was evaluated using the Jadad scale. The MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were consulted, and manual searches were performed in the most popular periodontics journals. The studies included considered a total of 122 patients, 203 surgical fields on which SCTGs were used, and 205 surgical fields on which PRF was used. The parameters analyzed were probing depth, clinical attachment level, gingival recession, and keratinized mucosa. The minimum follow-up period accepted was 6 months. A statistically significant difference between the SCTG and PRF groups was found only in the case of keratinized mucosa. However, gingival recession, clinical attachment level, and probing depth parameters in the PRF group were found to be statistically equal to those of the SCTG group (the gold standard) (p ≥0.05). PRF membranes were determined to be a promising alternative to autogenous gingival grafts in the treatment of Miller class I and II gingival recessions.

Keywords

connective tissue - platelet-rich fibrin - gingival recession - systematic review


Publication History

Article published online:
27 March 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol 2018; 89 (Suppl. 01) S204-S213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM. et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45 (Suppl. 20) S219-S229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Miller Jr PD. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985; 5 (02) 8-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Aguirre-Zorzano LA, García-De La Fuente AM, Estefanía-Fresco R, Marichalar-Mendía X. Complications of harvesting a connective tissue graft from the palate. A retrospective study and description of a new technique. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9 (12) e1439-e1445
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Perotto S, Romano F, Cricenti L, Gotti S, Aimetti M. Vascularization and innervation of connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions: a histologic and immunohistochemical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2017; 37 (04) 551-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Amine K, El Amrani Y, Chemlali S, Kissa J. Alternatives to connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recessions: a systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 119 (01) 25-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shah R, Triveni MG, Thomas R, Mehta DS. An update on the protocols and biologic actions of platelet rich fibrin in dentistry. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017; 25 (02) 64-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Agarwal SK, Jhingran R, Bains VK, Srivastava R, Madan R, Rizvi I. Patient-centered evaluation of microsurgical management of gingival recession using coronally advanced flap with platelet-rich fibrin or amnion membrane: a comparative analysis. Eur J Dent 2016; 10 (01) 121-133
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jankovic S, Aleksic Z, Klokkevold P. et al. Use of platelet-rich fibrin membrane following treatment of gingival recession: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012; 32 (02) e41-e50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Eren G, Atilla G. Platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of localized gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18 (08) 1941-1948
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tunalι M, Özdemir H, Arabacι T, Gürbüzer B, Pikdöken L, Firatli E. Clinical evaluation of autologous platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recession defects: a 12-month study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015; 35 (01) 105-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Eren G, Kantarcı A, Sculean A, Atilla G. Vascularization after treatment of gingival recession defects with platelet-rich fibrin or connective tissue graft. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20 (08) 2045-2053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Öncü E. The use of platelet-rich fibrin versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2017; 37 (02) 265-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mufti S, Dadawala SM, Patel P, Shah M, Dave DH. Comparative evaluation of platelet-rich fibrin with connective tissue grafts in the treatment of Miller’s class I gingival recessions. Contemp Clin Dent 2017; 8 (04) 531-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Eren G, Tervahartiala T, Sorsa T, Atilla G. Cytokine (interleukin-1beta) and MMP levels in gingival crevicular fluid after use of platelet-rich fibrin or connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recessions. J Periodontal Res 2016; 51 (04) 481-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Uraz A, Sezgin Y, Yalim M, Taner IL, Cetiner D. Comparative evaluation of platelet-rich fibrin membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple adjacent recession defects: a clinical study. J Dent Sci 2015; 10: 36-45
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Samani MK, Saberi BV, Ali Tabatabaei SM, Moghadam MG. The clinical evaluation of platelet-rich plasma on free gingival graft’s donor site wound healing. Eur J Dent 2017; 11 (04) 447-454
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 1996; 17 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Khan KS, Daya S, Jadad A. The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156 (06) 661-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 de Medeiros FCFL, Kudo GAH, Leme BG. et al. Dental implants in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 47 (04) 480-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Carvalho APV, Silva V, José Grande A. Avaliação do risco de viés de ensaios clínicos randomizados pela ferramenta da colaboração Cochrane. Diagn Tratamento 2013; 18: 38-44
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Moraschini V, Barboza Edos S. Use of platelet-rich fibrin membrane in the treatment of gingival recession: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2016; 87 (03) 281-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hennequin-Hoenderdos NL, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. The incidence of complications associated with lip and/or tongue piercings: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 2016; 14 (01) 62-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Arora S, Agnihotri N. Platelet derived biomaterials for therapeutic use: review of technical aspects. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2017; 33 (02) 159-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sethi KS, Karde PA, Joshi CP. Comparative evaluation of sutures coated with triclosan and chlorhexidine for oral biofilm inhibition potential and antimicrobial activity against periodontal pathogens: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2016; 27 (05) 535-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bosshardt DD. The periodontal pocket: pathogenesis, histopathology and consequences. Periodontol 2000 2018; 76 (01) 43-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Goel K. Supracrestal non-surgical therapy in periodontal diseases. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2018; 56 (209) 544-546
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Haydari M, Bardakci AG, Koldsland OC, Aass AM, Sandvik L, Preus HR. Comparing the effect of 0.06% -, 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine on plaque, bleeding and side effects in an experimental gingivitis model: a parallel group, double masked randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17 (01) 118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Herrera D, Alonso B, León R, Roldán S, Sanz M. Antimicrobial therapy in periodontitis: the use of systemic antimicrobials against the subgingival biofilm. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35 (Suppl. 08) 45-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Liu Y, Duan D, Xin Y. et al. A review of the literature: antibiotic usage and its relevance to the infection in periodontal flaps. Acta Odontol Scand 2017; 75 (04) 288-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kashefimehr A, Babaloo A, Ghanizadeh M, Ghasemi SH, Mollazadeh H. Effect of prophylactic administration of Novafen for periodontal surgery on postoperative pain relief. J Med Life 2017; 10 (02) 127-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kim BS, Kim YK, Yun PY. et al. Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107 (03) e24-e28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lang NP, Löe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol 1972; 43 (10) 623-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Marquez IC. The role of keratinized tissue and attached gingiva in maintaining periodontal/peri-implant health. Gen Dent 2004; 52 (01) 74-78
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E. et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 (Suppl. 15) 32-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Gobbato L, Avila-Ortiz G, Sohrabi K, Wang CW, Karimbux N. The effect of keratinized mucosa width on peri-implant health: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28 (06) 1536-1545
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Wennström JL. Lack of association between width of attached gingiva and development of soft tissue recession. A 5-year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14 (03) 181-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Wennström JL, Bengazi F, Lekholm U. The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the peri-implant soft tissue condition. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5 (01) 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Cornelini R, Cangini F, Covani U, Barone A, Buser D. Immediate restoration of single-tooth implants in mandibular molar sites: a 12-month preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 (06) 855-860
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Chiu YW, Lee SY, Lin YC, Lai YL. Significance of the width of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant health. J Chin Med Assoc 2015; 78 (07) 389-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Caruana A, Savina D, Macedo JP, Soares SC. From platelet-rich plasma to advanced platelet-rich fibrin: biological achievements and clinical advances in modern surgery. Eur J Dent 2019; 13 (02) 280-286
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Chicharro-Alcántara D, Rubio-Zaragoza M, Damiá-Giménez E. et al. Platelet rich plasma: new insights for cutaneous wound healing management. J Funct Biomater 2018; 9 (01) E10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Patel S, Maheshwari A, Chandra A. Biomarkers for wound healing and their evaluation. J Wound Care 2016; 25 (01) 46-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Rohani MG, Parks WC. Matrix remodeling by MMPs during wound repair. Matrix Biol 2015; 44-46: 113-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Siddiqui ZR, Jhingran R, Bains VK, Srivastava R, Madan R, Rizvi I. Comparative evaluation of platelet-rich fibrin versus beta-tri-calcium phosphate in the treatment of Grade II mandibular furcation defects using cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent 2016; 10 (04) 496-506
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Piattelli A, Sammartino G, Wang HL. New biomaterials and regenerative medicine strategies in periodontology, oral surgery, esthetic and implant dentistry 2016. BioMed Res Int 2017; 2017: 8209507
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Pinto NR, Pereda A. et al. The impact of the centrifuge characteristics and centrifugation protocols on the cells, growth factors, and fibrin architecture of a leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) clot and membrane. Platelets 2018; 29 (02) 171-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar