J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82(S 03): e342-e348
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701649
Original Article

Neurophysiological Characteristics of Cranial Nerves V- and VII-Triggered EMG in Endoscopic Endonasal Approach Skull Base Surgery

Carla J.A. Ferreira
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Marcus Sherer
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Katherine Anetakis
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Donald J. Crammond
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Jeffrey R. Balzer
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Parthasarathy D. Thirumala
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective This study proposes to present reference parameters for trigeminal (V) and facial (VII) cranial nerves (CNs)-triggered electromyography (tEMG) during endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) skull base surgeries to allow more precise and accurate mapping of these CNs.

Study Design We retrospectively reviewed EEA procedures performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 2009 and 2015. tEMG recorded in response to stimulation of CN V and VII was analyzed. Analysis of tEMG waveforms included latencies and amplitudes. Medical records were reviewed to determine the presence of perioperative neurologic deficits.

Results A total of 28 patients were included. tEMG from 34 CNs (22 V and 12 VII) were analyzed. For CN V, the average onset latency was 2.9 ± 1.1 ms and peak-to-peak amplitude was 525 ± 436.94 μV (n = 22). For CN VII, the average onset latency and peak-to-peak amplitude were 5.1 ± 1.43 ms and 315 ± 352.58 μV for the orbicularis oculi distribution (n = 09), 5.9 ± 0.67 ms and 517 ± 489.07 μV on orbicularis oris (n = 08), and 5.3 ± 0.98 ms 303.1 ± 215.3 μV on mentalis (n = 07), respectively.

Conclusion Our data support the notion that onset latency may be a feasible parameter in the differentiation between the CN V and VII during the crosstalk phenomenon in EEA surgeries but the particularities of this type of procedure should be taken into consideration. A prospective analysis with a larger data set is necessary.



Publication History

Received: 05 April 2018

Accepted: 24 December 2019

Article published online:
25 March 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (06) 1544-1568
  • 2 Shkarubo AN, Chernov IV, Ogurtsova AA. et al. Neurophysiological identification of cranial nerves during endoscopic endonasal surgery of skull base tumors: pilot study technical report. World Neurosurg 2017; 98: 230-238
  • 3 Slotty PJ, Abdulazim A, Kodama K. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during resection of infratentorial lesions: the surgeon's view. J Neurosurg 2017; 126 (01) 281-288
  • 4 Singh H, Vogel RW, Lober RM. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base: a technical guide. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016; 2016: 1751245
  • 5 Harper CM. Intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring. Muscle Nerve 2004; 29 (03) 339-351
  • 6 Shkarubo AN, Ogurtsova AA, Moshchev DA. et al. Neurophysiological identification of the cranial nerves in endoscopic endonasal surgery of skull base tumors [in Russian]. Vopr Neirokhir 2016; 80 (03) 35-49
  • 7 Thirumala PD, Mohanraj SK, Habeych M. et al. Value of free-run electromyographic monitoring of extraocular cranial nerves during expanded endonasal surgery (EES) of the skull base. J Neurol Surg Rep 2013; 74 (01) 43-50
  • 8 Thirumala PD, Mohanraj SK, Habeych M. et al. Value of free-run electromyographic monitoring of lower cranial nerves in endoscopic endonasal approach to skull base surgeries. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73 (04) 236-244
  • 9 Prell J, Rampp S, Romstöck J, Fahlbusch R, Strauss C. Train time as a quantitative electromyographic parameter for facial nerve function in patients undergoing surgery for vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (05) 826-832
  • 10 Yingling CD, Gardi JN. Intraoperative monitoring of facial and cochlear nerves during acoustic neuroma surgery. 1992. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2008; 19 (02) 289-315 , vii
  • 11 Fenton JE, Chin RYK, Shirazi A, Fagan PA. Prediction of postoperative facial nerve function in acoustic neuroma surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1999; 24 (06) 483-486
  • 12 Isaacson B, Kileny PR, El-Kashlan HK. Prediction of long-term facial nerve outcomes with intraoperative nerve monitoring. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26 (02) 270-273
  • 13 Kirkpatrick PJ, Watters G, Strong AJ, Walliker JR, Gleeson MJ. Prediction of facial nerve function after surgery for cerebellopontine angle tumors: use of a facial nerve stimulator and monitor. Skull Base Surg 1991; 1 (03) 171-176
  • 14 Bernat I, Grayeli AB, Esquia G, Zhang Z, Kalamarides M, Sterkers O. Intraoperative electromyography and surgical observations as predictive factors of facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (02) 306-312
  • 15 Yokoyama T, Uemura K, Ryu H. Facial nerve monitoring by monopolar low constant current stimulation during acoustic neurinoma surgery. Surg Neurol 1991; 36 (01) 12-18
  • 16 Maurer J, Pelster H, Amedee RG, Mann WJ. Intraoperative monitoring of motor cranial nerves in skull base surgery. Skull Base Surg 1995; 5 (03) 169-175
  • 17 Jackler RK, Pitts LH. Acoustic neuroma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1990; 1 (01) 199-223
  • 18 Schlake H-P, Goldbrunner RH, Milewski C. et al. Intra-operative electromyographic monitoring of the lower cranial motor nerves (LCN IX-XII) in skull base surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2001; 103 (02) 72-82
  • 19 Lanser MJ, Jackler RK, Yingling D. Regional monitoring of the lower (ninth through twelfth) cranial nerves. In: Kartush JM, Bouchard KR. eds. Neuromonitoring in Otology and Head and Neck Surgery. New York: Raven Press; 1991: 131-150
  • 20 Acioly MA, Liebsch M, de Aguiar PHP, Tatagiba M. Facial nerve monitoring during cerebellopontine angle and skull base tumor surgery: a systematic review from description to current success on function prediction. World Neurosurg 2013; 80 (06) e271-e300
  • 21 Minahan RE, Mandir AS. Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring of trigeminal and facial nerves. J Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 28 (06) 551-565
  • 22 Guo L, Jasiukaitis P, Pitts LH, Cheung SW. Optimal placement of recording electrodes for quantifying facial nerve compound muscle action potential. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29 (05) 710-713
  • 23 Assad WF, Simon MV, Eskandar EN. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the cranial nerves and brainstem. In: Intraoperative Neurophysiology. New York: Mirela V. Simon; 2010: 299-321
  • 24 Ashram YA, Yingling CD. Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. In: Intraoperative Monitoring of Neural Function. Vol 8. Amsterdam: Marc R. Nuwer; 2008: 371-383