Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2020; 14(01): 001-007
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701541
Original Article

Reduction of an in vitro Intraradicular Multispecies Biofilm Using Two Rotary Instrumentation Sequences

Angelo Zavattini
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Postgraduate Centre, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Jonathan Cowie
2   Circus Dental Practice, Bath, United Kingdom
,
Sadia Niazi
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Postgraduate Centre, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Massimo Giovarruscio
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Postgraduate Centre, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
3   Department of Therapeutic Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
,
Salvatore Sauro
3   Department of Therapeutic Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
4   Departamento de Odontologia, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera, Valencia, Spain
,
Federico Foschi
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Postgraduate Centre, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
3   Department of Therapeutic Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect per se of two shaping and cleaning techniques on the reduction of an in vitro multispecies biofilm.

Materials and Methods A total of 39 freshly extracted monoradicular teeth for periodontal reason were decoronated. Roots were sectioned longitudinally. After autoclaving, a specific stressed biofilm was grown on the root halves that were subsequently reassembled in a silicone index. Two treatments (n = 9 each)—RaCe (Schottlander; Letchworth Garden City, United Kingdom) and ProTaper Gold ( PTG; Dentsply Maillefer, Baillagues, Switzerland)—were tested; three noninstrumented samples served as a control group and three were rinsed with saline. Posttreatment samples were taken at three different levels of the root. Colony-forming units were counted after incubations. Additionally, three treatments (n = 5 each)—RaCe, PTG, and saline only—were evaluated under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM).

Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was conducted using Tukey’s test and analysis of variance to evaluate the post-instrumentation bioburden.

Results Both instrumentations were able to reduce the biofilm; however, differences were not present between them (p > 0.05). CLSM showed biofilm killing and disruption through mechanical shaping alone.

Conclusions Intraradicular biofilm is reduced with mechanical shaping. There was no difference between RaCe and PTG systems in biofilm reduction despite differences in design, file sequence, and rotational speed.

Keywords

biofilm - chemomechanical preparation - confocal microscope - endodontic infection - ProTaper Gold - RaCe - root canal


Publication History

Article published online:
04 February 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; 20: 340-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Möller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Ohman AE, Heyden G. Influence on periapical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89 (06) 475-484
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bergenholtz G. Micro-organisms from necrotic pulp of traumatized teeth. Odontol Revy 1974; 25 (04) 347-358
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974; 18 (02) 269-296
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Byström A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89 (04) 321-328
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dalton BC, Orstavik D, Phillips C, Pettiette M, Trope M. Bacterial reduction with nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. J Endod 1998; 24 (11) 763-767
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Coffae KP, Brilliant JD. The effect of serial preparation versus nonserial preparation on tissue removal in the root canals of extracted mandibular human molars. J Endod 1975; 1 (06) 211-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hsieh YD, Gau CH, Kung Wu SF, Shen EC, Hsu PW, Fu E. Dynamic recording of irrigating fluid distribution in root canals using thermal image analysis. Int Endod J 2007; 40 (01) 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15 (02) 167-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999; 284 (5418) 1318-1322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bhuva B, Patel S, Wilson R, Niazi S, Beighton D, Mannocci F. The effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation on intraradicular Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in extracted single-rooted human teeth. Int Endod J 2010; 43 (03) 241-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Prati C, Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S. Appearance of the root canal walls after preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. Clin Oral Investig 2004; 8 (02) 102-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Molander A, Caplan D, Bergenholtz G, Reit C. Improved quality of root fillings provided by general dental practitioners educated in nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. Int Endod J 2007; 40 (04) 254-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gergi R, Rjeily JA, Sader J, Naaman A. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography. J Endod 2010; 36 (05) 904-907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pasqualini D, Bianchi CC, Paolino DS. et al. Computed micro-tomographic evaluation of glide path with nickel-titanium rotary PathFile in maxillary first molars curved canals. J Endod 2012; 38 (03) 389-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Niazi SA, Clark D, Do T. et al. The effectiveness of enzymic irrigation in removing a nutrient-stressed endodontic multispecies biofilm. Int Endod J 2014; 47 (08) 756-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Niazi SA, Clarke D, Do T, Gilbert SC, Mannocci F, Beighton D. Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from refractory endodontic lesions are opportunistic pathogens. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48 (11) 3859-3869
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dahlén G, Samuelsson W, Molander A, Reit C. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from the root canal. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2000; 15 (05) 309-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Foschi F, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up. Int Endod J 2012; 45 (08) 711-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chávez de Paz LE. Image analysis software based on color segmentation for characterization of viability and physiological activity of biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75 (06) 1734-1739
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shen Y, Stojicic S, Haapasalo M. Bacterial viability in starved and revitalized biofilms: comparison of viability staining and direct culture. J Endod 2010; 36 (11) 1820-1823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Liu H, Wei X, Ling J, Wang W, Huang X. Biofilm formation capability of Enterococcus faecalis cells in starvation phase and its susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2010; 36 (04) 630-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Portenier I, Waltimo T, Ørstavik D, Haapasalo M. The susceptibility of starved, stationary phase, and growing cells of Enterococcus faecalis to endodontic medicaments. J Endod 2005; 31 (05) 380-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 2012; 45 (05) 449-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Pataky L, Iványi I, Grigár A, Fazekas A. Antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques: an in vitro comparative study. J Endod 2002; 28 (08) 603-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Shuping GB, Orstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod 2000; 26 (12) 751-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Chuste-Guillot MP, Badet C, Peli JF, Perez F. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102 (02) 254-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Siqueira Jr JF, Lima KC, Magalhães FA, Lopes HP, de Uzeda M. Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal by three instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1999; 25 (05) 332-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN, Santos SR, Lima KC, Magalhães FA, de Uzeda M. Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod 2002; 28 (03) 181-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar