PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2020; 14(01): 024-030
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701162
Original Article

Peri-implantitis and Severity Level

Eser Elemek
1   Private Practice, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Omer Birkan Agrali
2   Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Bahar Kuru
3   Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Leyla Kuru
2   Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Different diagnostic criteria were used for diagnosis of peri-implant diseases. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore prevalence of peri-implant diseases and subclassify peri-implantitis based on different levels of radiographic and clinical findings.

Materials and Methods Two hundred patients having 655 dental implants were included in this study. In addition to clinical measurements, standard long-cone parallel technique was used to evaluate marginal bone level around implants. Following diagnosis of peri-implant diseases, peri-implantitis was further subclassified using a severity leveling in terms of marginal bone level and probing depth.

Results Mean age of 200 subjects was 52.8 ± 12.2 years and 63% were females. In total, bleeding on probing was present in 93% and suppuration in 27% of implants. On subject basis, 2.5% were diagnosed as healthy, 28% with peri-implant mucositis (PM), and 69.5% with peri-implantitis, whereas on implant basis, 3.6% were healthy, 36% presented PM, and 60.4% peri-implantitis. Furthermore, when severity leveling was applied, peri-implantitis prevalence changed markedly and ranged from 14.5 to 31.0% at the subject level and from 10.0 to 22.0% at the implant level. Subgingival restoration margins were observed in 70.6% of patients for implants with PM and in 44% patients for implants with peri-implantitis. Most of the implants with peri-implantitis were with platform match (71.5%).

Conclusions Applying different thresholds to the peri-implantitis definition yielded different prevalence rates ranging from 10 to 31%. As no established diagnostic criteria are being used today, results from clinical studies may not reflect the true disease prevalence.

Keywords

marginal bone level - peri-implant disease - peri-implantitis


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. März 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Albrektsson T, Isidor F. Consensus report of session IV. In: Lang NP, Karring T. eds. Proceeding of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. London: Quintessence Publishing; 1994: 365-369
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Marinello CP, Lindhe J. Experimental peri-implant mucositis in man. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28 (06) 517-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Berglundh T, Gislason O, Lekholm U, Sennerby L, Lindhe J. Histopathological observations of human periimplantitis lesions. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31 (05) 341-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 van Winkelhoff AJ, Goené RJ, Benschop C, Folmer T. Early colonization of dental implants by putative periodontal pathogens in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11 (06) 511-520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Renvert S, Roos-Jansåker AM, Claffey N. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a literature review. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35 (Suppl. 08) 305-315
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Lang NP. Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 2010; 53: 167-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35 (Suppl. 08) 286-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lindhe J, Meyle J. Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology. Peri-implant diseases: consensus report of the sixth european workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35 (Suppl. 08) 282-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Koldsland OC, Scheie AA, Aass AM. Prevalence of peri-implantitis related to severity of the disease with different degrees of bone loss. J Periodontol 2010; 81 (02) 231-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Cortelli JR, Costa JE, Costa FO. Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33 (12) 929-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Renvert S, Aghazadeh A, Hallström H, Persson GR. Factors related to peri-implantitis - a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25 (04) 522-529
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sanz M, Chapple IL. Working Group 4 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology. Clinical research on peri-implant diseases: consensus report of Working Group 4. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39 (Suppl. 12) 202-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condtion. Acta Odontol Scand 1964; 22: 121-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963; 21: 533-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mir-Mari J, Mir-Orfila P, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Gay-Escoda C. Prevalence of peri-implant diseases. A cross-sectional study based on a private practice environment. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39 (05) 490-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Aguirre-Zorzano LAR, Estefanía-Fresco R, Telletxea O, Bravo M. Prevalence of peri-implant inflammatory disease in patients with a history of periodontal disease who receive supportive periodontal therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26 (11) 1338-1344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Konstantinidis IK, Kotsakis GA, Gerdes S, Walter MH. Cross-sectional study on the prevalence and risk indicators of peri-implant diseases. Eur J Oral Implantology 2015; 8 (01) 75-88
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lang NP, Berglundh T. Working Group 4 of Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. Periimplant diseases: where are we now?–consensus of the seventh European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38 (Suppl. 11) 178-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mombelli A, Müller N, Cionca N. The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (06) (Suppl. 06) 67-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Roos-Jansåker AM. Long time follow up of implant therapy and treatment of peri-implantitis. Swed Dent J Suppl 2007; 188 (188) 7-66
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Serino G, Turri A, Lang NP. Probing at implants with peri-implantitis and its relation to clinical peri-implant bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24 (01) 91-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Marrone A, Lasserre J, Bercy P, Brecx MC. Prevalence and risk factors for peri-implant disease in Belgian adults. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24 (08) 934-940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Karbach J, Callaway A, Kwon YD, d’Hoedt B, Al-Nawas B. Comparison of five parameters as risk factors for peri-mucositis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 (03) 491-496
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Rinke S, Ohl S, Ziebolz D, Lange K, Eickholz P. Prevalence of periimplant disease in partially edentulous patients: a practice-based cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22 (08) 826-833
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35 (Suppl. 08) 292-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Passariello C, Di Nardo D, Testarelli L. Inflammatory periimplant diseases and the periodontal connection question. Eur J Dent 2019; 13 (01) 119-123
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Van der Weijden GA, van Bemmel KM, Renvert S. Implant therapy in partially edentulous, periodontally compromised patients: a review. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32 (05) 506-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Karoussis IK, Kotsovilis S, Fourmousis I. A comprehensive and critical review of dental implant prognosis in periodontally compromised partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18 (06) 669-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Roos-Jansåker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, Renvert S. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri-implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33 (04) 290-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wennström JL, Derks J. Is there a need for keratinized mucosa around implants to maintain health and tissue stability. ? Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (06) (Suppl. 06) 136-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Jepsen S, Berglundh T, Genco R. et al. Primary prevention of peri-implantitis: managing peri-implant mucositis. J Clin Periodontol 2015; 42 (Suppl. 16) S152-S157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Farronato D, Santoro G, Canullo L, Botticelli D, Maiorana C, Lang NP. Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connective tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of “platform switching”: a histologic study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (01) 90-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Finelle G, Papadimitriou DEV, Souza AB, Katebi N, Gallucci GO, Araújo MG. Peri-implant soft tissue and marginal bone adaptation on implant with non-matching healing abutments: micro-CT analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26 (04) e42-e46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Jemt T, Johansson J. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006; 8 (02) 61-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar