CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2019; 52(03): 349-354
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402705
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Location and Extent of A1, A2 Release and Its Impact on Tendon Subluxation and Bowstringing—A Cadaveric Study

Laxminarayan Bhandari
1   Christine M. Kleinert Institute of Hand and Microsurgery, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
,
Alireza Hamidian Jahromi
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
,
Aden Gunnar Miller
1   Christine M. Kleinert Institute of Hand and Microsurgery, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
,
Huey Tien
1   Christine M. Kleinert Institute of Hand and Microsurgery, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 December 2019 (online)

Abstract

Surgical treatment of trigger finger involves release of A1 pulley. Some authors have theorized that the loss of A1 pulley can lead to ulnar subluxation of flexor tendons, which can be prevented by release of A1 pulley radially, even in a nonrheumatoid hand. However, there is no evidence in literature to either support or oppose this hypothesis. Occasionally, difficulty is encountered to precisely identify where A1 ends and A2 begins. While incomplete release of A1 can cause relapse of triggering, release of substantial A2 can cause bowstringing. Knowledge of the safe limit of concomitant A2 release is beneficial. The study was conducted in 12 cadaver upper extremity specimens. A1 pulleys of 48 fingers were divided at the radial (24 fingers) or ulnar (24 fingers) attachment. A 20lb traction force was applied on the flexor tendons. Any subluxation or bowstringing was noted. The experiment was repeated following serial release of the A2—initially 25%, followed by 50% and 100%. No bowstringing or subluxation was noted when A1 pulley was opened, either by radial or ulnar incision. The same was true for A1 + 25% A2 release. When A1 + 50% A2 pulley were released, bowstringing was observed in 3/48 fingers. When A1 + 100% of the A2 pulley were released, bowstringing occurred in all cases. The location of incision for release of the A1 pulley has no effect on bowstringing or tendon subluxation. Release of additional 25% of the A2 pulley can be performed safely, which corresponds to the level of palmar digital crease.

 
  • References

  • 1 Peterson WW, Manske PR, Bollinger BA, Lesker PA, McCarthy JA. Effect of pulley excision on flexor tendon biomechanics. J Orthop Res 1986; 4 (01) 96-101
  • 2 Flatt AE. Notta’s nodules and trigger digits. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent 2007; 20 (02) 143-145
  • 3 Kozlow JH, Chung KC. Current concepts in the surgical management of rheumatoid and osteoarthritic hands and wrists. Hand Clin 2011; 27 (01) 31-41
  • 4 Niumsawatt V, Mao D, Salerno S, Rozen WM. Trigger finger release with stepwise preservation of the A1 pulley: a functional pulley-preserving technique. Int Surg 2013; 98 (04) 437-444
  • 5 Lin GT, Cooney WP, Amadio PC, An KN. Mechanical properties of human pulleys. J Hand Surg [Br] 1990; 15 (04) 429-434
  • 6 Charan J, Kantharia ND. How to calculate sample size in animal studies?. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2013; 4 (04) 303-306
  • 7 Ejeskär A, Ortengren R. Isolated finger flexion force—a methodological study. Hand 1981; 13 (03) 223-230
  • 8 Lu SC, Yang TH, Kuo LC, Jou IM, Sun YN, Su FC. Effects of different extents of pulley release on tendon excursion efficiency and tendon moment arms. J Orthop Res 2015; 33 (02) 224-228
  • 9 Wilhelmi BJ, Snyder IV N, Verbesey JE, Ganchi PA, Lee WP. Trigger finger release with hand surface landmark ratios: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (04) 908-915
  • 10 Heithoff SJ, Millender LH, Helman J. Bowstringing as a complication of trigger finger release. J Hand Surg Am 1988; 13 (04) 567-570