Stereotactic Brainstem Biopsy: Technical Aspects with Emphasis on Role of Awake Craniotomy

Abstract

Introduction The role of frame-based stereotactic biopsy in brainstem lesions has been well established in literature. Transfrontal, transtentorial, and transcerebellar routes are used to access various targets within the brainstem. While the transfrontal approach is preferable in midbrain lesions, a transcerebellar approach via the middle cerebellar peduncle forms the shortest possible trajectory for pontine and medullary lesions.

Objective Authors to describe the technical nuances of frame-based stereotactic biopsy of lower brainstem lesions to increase the procedural safety and efficacy.

Materials and Methods Technical modifications in frame fixation were done to acheive the desired trajectory to the target. In adult cases biopsy was performed with patient awake during the procedure.

Results Total of five patients underwent biopsy with the technical modifications. Three patients were adults and two were in pediatric age group. Their age ranged from 12 to 50 years. No complications were encountered. Two of the biopsies showed demyelination and the other three turned out to be low-grade glioma, pilocytic astrocytoma, and lymphoma, respectively.

Conclusion Despite obvious inherent risks, the transcerebellar biopsy in semi-sitting position is a well-tolerated and effective method of obtaining a diagnostic tissue sample in brainstem lesions. We have noted that adoption of the technical modifications described in this article has aided in improving the safety and ease of the procedure.

Keywords

stereotactic biopsy - brainstem lesions - awake craniotomy

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. März 2020

• References

• 1 Pereira EA, Jegan T, Green AL, Aziz TZ. Awake stereotactic brainstem biopsy via a contralateral, transfrontal, transventricular approach. Br J Neurosurg 2008; 22 (04) 599-601
• 2 Samadani U, Stein S, Moonis G, Sonnad SS, Bonura P, Judy KD. Stereotactic biopsy of brain stem masses: decision analysis and literature review. Surg Neurol 2006; 66 (05) 484-490, discussion 491
• 3 Abernathey CD, Camacho A, Kelly PJ. Stereotaxic suboccipital transcerebellar biopsy of pontine mass lesions. J Neurosurg 1989; 70 (02) 195-200
• 4 Epstein F, McCleary EL. Intrinsic brain-stem tumors of childhood: surgical indications. J Neurosurg 1986; 64 (01) 11-15
• 5 Rajshekhar V, Moorthy RK. Status of stereotactic biopsy in children with brain stem masses: insights from a series of 106 patients. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2010; 88 (06) 360-366
• 6 Wilkinson R, Harris J. Moral and legal reasons for altruism in the case of brainstem biopsy in diffuse glioma. Br J Neurosurg 2008; 22 (05) 617-618
• 7 Brodbelt A. Commentary on diffuse brain stem glioma in children. Br J Neurosurg 2008; 22 (05) 625
• 8 Hargrave D, Bartels U, Bouffet E. Diffuse brainstem glioma in children: critical review of clinical trials. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7 (03) 241-248
• 9 Nishio S, Fukui M, Tateishi J. Brain stem gliomas: a clinicopathological analysis of 23 histologically proven cases. J Neurooncol 1988; 6 (03) 245-250
• 10 Nishio S, Takeshita I, Fujii K, Fukui M. Brain stem glioma: the role of a biopsy. Br J Neurosurg 1991; 5 (03) 265-273
• 11 Gleason CA, Wise BL, Feinstein B. Stereotactic localization (with computerized tomographic scanning), biopsy, and radiofrequency treatment of deep brain lesions. Neurosurgery 1978; 2 (03) 217-222
• 12 Amundson EW, McGirt MJ, Olivi A. A contralateral, transfrontal, extraventricular approach to stereotactic brainstem biopsy procedures. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2005; 102 (03) 565-570
• 13 Boviatsis EJ, Kouyialis AT, Stranjalis G, Korfias S, Sakas DE. CT-guided stereotactic biopsies of brain stem lesions: personal experience and literature review. Neurol Sci 2003; 24 (03) 97-102
• 14 Coffey RJ, Lunsford LD. Stereotactic surgery for mass lesions of the midbrain and pons. Neurosurgery 1985; 17 (01) 12-18
• 15 Giunta F, Marini G, Grasso G, Zorzi F. Brain stem expansive lesions: stereotactic biopsy for a better therapeutic approach. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1988; 42: 182-186
• 16 Gonçalves-Ferreira AJ, Herculano-Carvalho M, Pimentel J. Stereotactic biopsies of focal brainstem lesions. Surg Neurol 2003; 60 (04) 311-320, discussion 320
• 17 Guthrie BL, Steinberg GK, Adler JR. Posterior fossa stereotaxic biopsy using the Brown-Roberts-Wells stereotaxic system. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1989; 70 (04) 649-652
• 18 Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD. Results and expectations with image-integrated brainstem stereotactic biopsy. Surg Neurol 1995; 43 (06) 558-562
• 19 Kratimenos GP, Thomas DG. The role of image-directed biopsy in the diagnosis and management of brainstem lesions. Br J Neurosurg 1993; 7 (02) 155-164
• 20 Rajshekhar V, Chandy MJ. Computerized tomography-guided stereotactic surgery for brainstem masses: a risk-benefit analysis in 71 patients. J Neurosurg 1995; 82 (06) 976-981
• 21 Steck J, Friedman WA. Stereotactic biopsy of brainstem mass lesions. Surg Neurol 1995; 43 (06) 563-567, discussion 567–568
• 22 Buczkowicz P, Hoeman C, Rakopoulos P. et al. Genomic analysis of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas identifies three molecular subgroups and recurrent activating ACVR1 mutations. Nat Genet 2014; 46 (05) 451-456
• 23 Grasso CS, Tang Y, Truffaux N. et al. Functionally defined therapeutic targets in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Nat Med 2015; 21 (06) 555-559
• 24 Schroeder KM, Hoeman CM, Becher OJ. Children are not just little adults: recent advances in understanding of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma biology. Pediatr Res 2014; 75 (1-2) 205-209
• 25 Spiegelmann R, Friedman WA. Stereotactic suboccipital transcerebellar biopsy under local anesthesia using the Cosman-Roberts-Wells frame. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1991; 75 (03) 486-488
• 26 Samadani U, Judy KD. Stereotactic brainstem biopsy is indicated for the diagnosis of a vast array of brainstem pathology. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2003; 81 (1-4) 5-9