Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2019; 11(02): e44-e48
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400736
Research Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Evaluation of Ophthalmology Residency Program Web Sites

Deena S. Shaath 
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Prairie Village, Kansas
,
Thomas J. Whittaker
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Prairie Village, Kansas
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

11 April 2019

16 October 2019

Publication Date:
03 December 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This article evaluates the current availability of information on residency program Web sites that may be of interest to residency applicants.

Design Cross-sectional analysis of 117 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited ophthalmology residency program Web sites from October 17, 2018 to December 17, 2018.

Methods Programs were identified through the ACGME-specialty search, and the URL links provided by the program were evaluated for directing the user to the institution, department, or residency program. If a link was not functional or not provided, programs were identified through a Google search. Web sites were evaluated for having information on how to apply, application requirements and eligibility, and providing a link to the San Francisco (SF) Match. Educational content included: didactic instruction, rotation overview, research requirement information, active and/or past research, institutional conferences, academic conferences, call schedules, and charitable work. Recruitment content included current residents and faculty and their biographies, graduate placement, salary, benefits, surrounding area information, message from the Program Director, Chair, and/or Chief Residents, surgical statistics, affiliated hospital information, selection criteria, and association links. Data was stratified by program size, geographic region, and top 20 hospitals in ophthalmology by the U.S. News & World Report.

Results Nonfunctional links were provided by 16.2% of programs, and 3.4% did not provide a link. Application instructions were presented by 83% of programs and 77% provided a link to the SF Match. Greater than 80% provided didactic instruction, rotation overviews, research expectations of residents, and faculty and resident listings. Up to half of programs listed information about application requirements and eligibility, call schedules, surgical statistics, academic conferences, charitable work, salary, and selection criteria. A message to applicants was displayed by 48% of programs, and 16% of programs provided association links. Programs with more than 15 residents provided more educational content than programs with less than 12 (p = 0.042). Differences in recruitment content were observed among programs in the Northeast and West, (p = 0.003) and programs in the South and West (p = 0.037). No other differences were observed.

Conclusion The Internet is frequently consulted during the residency application process. Many programs provide basic information, but this can be further optimized to maximize the utility of residency Web sites.

Keywords

ophthalmology residency - ophthalmology Web site - application - accessibility - Internet resource
 

  • References

  • 1 Chu LF, Young CA, Zamora AK. , et al. Self-reported information needs of anesthesia residency applicants and analysis of applicant-related web sites resources at 131 United States training programs. Anesth Analg 2011; 112 (02) 430-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Embi PJ, Desai S, Cooney TG. Use and utility of Web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants. J Med Internet Res 2003; 5 (03) e22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gaeta TJ, Birkhahn RH, Lamont D, Banga N, Bove JJ. Aspects of residency programs' web sites important to student applicants. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12 (01) 89-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Shaath MK, Yeranosian MG, Ippolito JA, Adams MR, Sirkin MS, Reilly MC. Evaluation of the content and accessibility of web sites for accredited orthopaedic trauma surgery fellowships. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (09) e60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Huang BY, Hicks TD, Haidar GM, Pounds LL, Davies MG. An evaluation of the availability, accessibility, and quality of online content of vascular surgery training program websites for residency and fellowship applicants. J Vasc Surg 2017; 66 (06) 1892-1901
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Davidson AR, Loftis CM, Throckmorton TW, Kelly DM. Accessibility and availability of online information for orthopedic surgery residency programs. Iowa Orthop J 2016; 36: 31-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wakefield DV, Manole BA, Jethanandani A. , et al. Accessibility, availability, and quality of online information for US radiation oncology residencies. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 6 (03) 160-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Svider PF, Gupta A, Johnson AP. , et al. Evaluation of otolaryngology residency program websites. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 140 (10) 956-960
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Skovrlj B, Silvestre J, Ibeh C, Abbatematteo JM, Mocco J. Neurosurgery residency websites: a critical evaluation. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (03) 727-733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hansberry DR, Bornstein J, Agarwal N, McClure KE, Deshmukh SP, Long S. An assessment of radiology residency program websites. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (04) 663-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ashack KA, Burton KA, Soh JM. , et al. Evaluating dermatology residency program websites. Dermatol Online J 2016; 22 (03) 13030/qt7rx3j2dn
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Homer N, Yoon MK. Evaluation of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) fellowship program website content and quality. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 33 (06) 471-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stoeger SM, Freeman H, Bitter B, Helmer SD, Reyes J, Vincent KB. Evaluation of general surgery residency program websites. Am J Surg 2019; 217 (04) 794-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Advanced Program Search. [Website]. 2018 . Available at: https://apps.acgme.org/ads/Public/Programs/Search . Accessed October 17, 2018
    PubMed
  • 15 Regions. 2010 . Available at: https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/webatlas/regions.html . Accessed March 3, 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 US News and World Report Best Hospitals for Ophthalmology [Report]. Available at: https://health.usnews.com/best-hospitals/rankings/ophthalmology . Accessed December 18, 2018
    PubMed
  • 17 Mayo GL, Lindhorst GC, Rosende C. American ophthalmology graduate medical education and the web: current state of internet resource utilization. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135 (05) 708-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Begaj T, Helmy O, Leeman S, Schaal S. The current online face of U.S. academic ophthalmology. J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10 (01) e114-e121
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chen VW, Hoang D, Garner W. Do websites provide what applicants need? Plastic Surgery residency program websites versus applicant self-reported needs. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (10) e1900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Deloney LA, Perrot LJ, Lensing SY, Jambhekar K. Radiology resident recruitment: a study of the impact of web-based information and interview day activities. Acad Radiol 2014; 21 (07) 931-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Yousuf SJ, Kwagyan J, Jones LS. Applicants' choice of an ophthalmology residency program. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (02) 423-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ophthalmology Residency Match Summary Report; 2018 . Available at: https://www.sfmatch.org/PDFFilesDisplay/Ophthalmology_Residency_Stats_2018.pdf . Accessed December 25, 2018
    PubMed