A Cross-Sectional Study to Understand 3D Facial Differences in a Population of African Americans and Caucasians

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this cross-sectional retrospective study was to use three-dimensional surface imaging to determine gender dimorphism and facial morphological changes from adolescence to adulthood in African American and Caucasian populations.

Materials and Methods Three-dimensional images were captured and the total sample size included 371 subjects. Images were combined using Rapidform 2006 Plus Pack 2 software to produce a male and female facial average for each population. Comparisons were conducted within the following categories: (1) gender comparison within each race, (2) adult and adolescent comparison within each race, and (3) adult and adolescent comparison between the races.

Results Adolescent gender comparisons within each race showed high percentages of similarity. However, adult females in both races showed more prominent periorbital, malar, and nasolabial regions and less prominent lower forehead, nose, and lower face compared with adult males of the same race. African American adult females showed increase in length and width of the face, increased nasal tip projection, and decreased periorbital regions compared with African American adolescent females. Welsh adult females had an increase in the nose and chin projection compared with Welsh adolescent females. Adult males of both races had increase in nose and chin projection, increase in length and width of the face, and decreased periorbital, malar, and nasolabial regions compared with adolescent males of the same race. African American adolescents had a wider alar base, more protrusive lips, and periorbital regions, and less prominent nose and chin compared with the Welsh adolescents. African American adults also had a wider alar base; more protrusive lips and periorbital regions; a broader face; and more retrusive chin, nose, nasolabial region; and lower forehead compared with Welsh adults.

Conclusions Few differences were noted between genders within the same racial groups during adolescence. However, changes became more distinct in adulthood. From adolescence to adulthood, facial morphologies were similarly matched within the gender for females; however, there were significant changes for males. Lastly, facial morphology patterns tend to be established early in life.

Keywords

3D faces - 3D imaging - orthodontics

• References

• 1 Weinberg SM. 3D stereophotogrammetry versus traditional craniofacial anthropometry: comparing measurements from the 3D facial norms database to Farkas’s North American norms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019; 155 (05) 693-701
• 2 Richmond S, Howe LJ, Lewis S, Stergiakouli E, Zhurov A. Facial genetics: a brief overview. Front Genet 2018; 9: 462
• 3 Weinberg SM, Cornell R, Leslie EJ. Craniofacial genetics: where have we been and where are we going?. PLoS Genet 2018; 14 (06) e1007438
• 4 Kau CH, Richmond S. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology surface changes in untreated children from 12 to 14 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134 (06) 751-760
• 5 Wong ME, Kau CH, Melville JC, Patel T, Spagnoli DB. Bone reconstruction planning using computer technology for surgical management of severe maxillomandibular atrophy. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2019; 31 (03) 457-472
• 6 Kau CH, Cronin AJ, Richmond S. A three-dimensional evaluation of postoperative swelling following orthognathic surgery at 6 months. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2192-2199
• 7 Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Colombo A, Ciusa V. Soft tissue facial growth and development as assessed by the three-dimensional computerized mesh diagram analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116 (02) 215-228
• 8 Kau CH, Zhurov A, Richmond S, Cronin A, Savio C, Mallorie C. Facial templates: a new perspective in three dimensions. Orthod Craniofac Res 2006; 9 (01) 10-17
• 9 Kesterke MJ, Raffensperger ZD, Heike CL. et al. Using the 3D Facial Norms Database to investigate craniofacial sexual dimorphism in healthy children, adolescents, and adults. Biol Sex Differ 2016; 7: 23
• 10 Kau CH, Richmond S, Zhurov A. et al. Use of 3-dimensional surface acquisition to study facial morphology in 5 populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137 (4 Suppl) S56 e51-59 discussion S56–57
• 11 Talbert L, Kau CH, Christou T, Vlachos C, Souccar N. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population. J Orthod 2014; 41 (01) 19-29
• 12 Kau CH, Zhurov A, Richmond S. et al. The 3-dimensional construction of the average 11-year-old child face: a clinical evaluation and application. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64 (07) 1086-1092
• 13 Lübbers HT, Medinger L, Kruse A, Grätz KW, Matthews F. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (03) 763-767
• 14 Kau CH, Richmond S, Zhurov AI. et al. Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128 (04) 424-430
• 15 Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier 2007
• 16 Sushner NI. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population. Am J Orthod 1977; 72 (04) 373-385
• 17 Taylor WH, Hitchcock HP. The Alabama analysis. Am J Orthod 1966; 52 (04) 245-265