CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2020; 55(02): 203-207
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400521
Artigo Original
Medicina do Esporte
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Comparação funcional entre membro dominante e não dominante em atletas com dor inguinal[]

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
1   Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
,
André Orlandi Bento
1   Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
,
Luana Tossolini Goulart
1   Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
,
Leonardo Zafalon
1   Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
,
Gustavo Gonçalves Arliani
1   Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
,
Móises Cohen
1   Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

30. November 2018

05. Februar 2019

Publikationsdatum:
09. Januar 2020 (online)

Resumo

Objetivo Comparar a diferença do arco de movimento (ADM) entre o quadril com lesão e o não lesionado de atletas com as principais patologias femoroacetabulares. Além disso, analisar a diferença da ADM do quadril em cada patologia considerada.

Métodos Os participantes do presente estudo foram 75 atletas de diversas modalidades esportivas, sendo 56 mulheres e 19 homens, com idades entre 20 e 46 anos, os quais tinham diagnóstico de lesão do quadril. Esses indivíduos foram subdivididos em três grupos de acordo com as patologias (impacto femoroacetabular ou lesão labral, pubalgia ou lesão dos adutores e síndrome trocantérica) e as características de cada quadril foram analisadas.

Resultados Um total de 150 quadris (direito e esquerdo) foram mensurados para a presente análise. Comparou-se o ADM do quadril lesado e do quadril saudável de cada atleta e não foram encontradas diferenças estatísticas. Da mesma forma, não houve diferença significativa entre a ADM do quadril entre as principais injúrias.

Conclusão O presente estudo não encontrou diferenças no arco de movimento entre o quadril lesionado e o contralateral, bem como não houve diferença na amplitude dos movimentos entre as patologias femoroacetabulares analisadas.

Trabalho desenvolvido no Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.


 
  • Referências

  • 1 Feeley BT, Powell JW, Muller MS, Barnes RP, Warren RF, Kelly BT. Hip injuries and labral tears in the national football league. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (11) 2187-2195
  • 2 Ansede G, English B, Healy JC. Groin pain: clinical assessment and the role of MR imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2011; 15 (01) 3-13
  • 3 Franklyn-Miller A, Richter C, King E. , et al. Athletic groin pain (part 2): a prospective cohort study on the biomechanical evaluation of change of direction identifies three clusters of movement patterns. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51 (05) 460-468
  • 4 Morelli V, Weaver V. Groin injuries and groin pain in athletes: part 1. Prim Care 2005; 32 (01) 163-183
  • 5 Alomar AZ. Groin pain in athletes: differential diagnosis, assessment, and management. Saudi J Sports Med. 2015; 15 (01) 3-8
  • 6 Werner J, Hägglund M, Waldén M, Ekstrand J. UEFA injury study: a prospective study of hip and groin injuries in professional football over seven consecutive seasons. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43 (13) 1036-1040
  • 7 Benazzo F, Mosconi M, Viola E. Groin pain in athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2000; 8: 80-85
  • 8 Narvani AA, Tsiridis E, Kendall S, Chaudhuri R, Thomas P. A preliminary report on prevalence of acetabular labrum tears in sports patients with groin pain. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11 (06) 403-408
  • 9 Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H, Curry M, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC. Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (07) 1448-1457
  • 10 Anderson K, Strickland SM, Warren R. Hip and groin injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (04) 521-533
  • 11 Ellenbecker TS, Ellenbecker GA, Roetert EP, Silva RT, Keuter G, Sperling F. Descriptive profile of hip rotation range of motion in elite tennis players and professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (08) 1371-1376
  • 12 Ibrahim A, Murrell GA, Knapman P. Adductor strain and hip range of movement in male professional soccer players. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2007; 15 (01) 46-49
  • 13 Tak I, Engelaar L, Gouttebarge V. , et al. Is lower hip range of motion a risk factor for groin pain in athletes? A systematic review with clinical applications. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51 (22) 1611-1621
  • 14 Arnason A, Sigurdsson SB, Gudmundsson A, Holme I, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Risk factors for injuries in football. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (1, Suppl) 5S-16S
  • 15 Cibulka MT, Strube MJ, Meier D. , et al. Symmetrical and asymmetrical hip rotation and its relationship to hip rotator muscle strength. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010; 25 (01) 56-62
  • 16 Fricker PA, Taunton JE, Ammann W. Osteitis pubis in athletes. Infection, inflammation or injury?. Sports Med 1991; 12 (04) 266-279
  • 17 Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscles, testing and function: With posture and pain. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1993
  • 18 Williams JG. Limitation of hip joint movement as a factor in traumatic osteitis pubis. Br J Sports Med 1978; 12 (03) 129-133
  • 19 Bird PA, Oakley SP, Shnier R, Kirkham BW. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and physical examination findings in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44 (09) 2138-2145
  • 20 Martin RL, Enseki KR, Draovitch P, Trapuzzano T, Philippon MJ. Acetabular labral tears of the hip: examination and diagnostic challenges. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006; 36 (07) 503-515
  • 21 Roach KE, Miles TP. Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Phys Ther 1991; 71 (09) 656-665
  • 22 Picha KJ, Harding JL, Bliven KC. Glenohumeral and Hip Range-of-Motion and Strength Measures in Youth Baseball Athletes. J Athl Train 2016; 51 (06) 466-473
  • 23 Li X, Ma R, Zhou H. , et al. Evaluation of Hip Internal and External Rotation Range of Motion as an Injury Risk Factor for Hip, Abdominal and Groin Injuries in Professional Baseball Players. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2015; 7 (04) 6142
  • 24 Mosler AB, Crossley KM, Thorborg K. , et al. Hip strength and range of motion: Normal values from a professional football league. J Sci Med Sport 2017; 20 (04) 339-343
  • 25 Cheatham S, Hanney WJ, Kolber MJ. Hip range of motion in recreational weight training participants: a descriptive report. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2017; 12 (05) 764-773
  • 26 Kouyoumdjian P, Coulomb R, Sanchez T, Asencio G. Clinical evaluation of hip joint rotation range of motion in adults. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98 (01) 17-23
  • 27 Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Esterman A, Oakeshott RD, Spriggins AJ. Hip joint range of motion restriction precedes athletic chronic groin injury. J Sci Med Sport 2007; 10 (06) 463-466