CC BY 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019; 41(12): 682-687
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400455
Original Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Risks of Maternal Obesity in Pregnancy: A Case-control Study in a Portuguese Obstetrical Population

Riscos da obesidade materna na gravidez: um estudo caso-controle em uma oopulação obstétrica portuguesa
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
2   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Porto, Portugal
,
Maria Filipa Malheiro
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
João Cavaco Gomes
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Tiago Ferraz
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
3   Medicine Faculty, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
4   I3S Innovation in Health and Investigation Institute, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
Nuno Montenegro
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
3   Medicine Faculty, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
5   Epidemology Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

03. Juli 2019

09. Oktober 2019

Publikationsdatum:
19. Dezember 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective The present study aims to understand to what extent obesity is related to adverse maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes in a Portuguese obstetrical population.

Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics of a differentiated perinatal care facility. The study compared 1,183 obese pregnant women with 5,399 normal or underweight pregnant women for the occurrence of gestational diabetes, hypertensive pregnancy disorders, and preterm birth. Mode of delivery, birthweight, and neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) admissions were also evaluated. Mean blood glucose values were evaluated and compared between groups, in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. Only singleton pregnancies were considered.

Results The prevalence of obesity was 13.6%. Obese pregnant women were significantly more likely to have cesarean sections (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.0, p < 0.001), gestational diabetes (aOR 2.14, p < 0.001), hypertensive pregnancy disorders (aOR 3.43, p < 0.001), and large-for-gestational age or macrosomic infants (aOR 2.13, p < 0.001), and less likely to have small-for-gestational age newborns (aOR 0.51, p < 0.009). No significant differences were found in terms of preterm births, fetal/neonatal deaths, low birthweight newborns, and neonatal ICU admissions among cases and controls. Maternal obesity was significantly associated with higher mean blood glucose levels, in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy.

Conclusion Obesity is associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. These risks seem to increase progressively with increasing body mass index (BMI) class. Female obesity should be considered a major public health issue and has consequences on maternal-fetal health.

Resumo

Objetivo O presente estudo pretende avaliar em que medida a obesidade influencia os desfechos maternos, obstétricos e neonatais em uma população obstétrica portuguesa.

Métodos Um estudo caso-controle retrospectivo foi realizado no departamento de obstetrícia de um centro perinatal diferenciado. O estudo comparou 1.183 grávidas obesas com 5.399 grávidas normoponderais ou com baixo peso para a ocorrência de diabetes gestacional, doenças hipertensivas da gravidez e parto pré-termo. Via de parto, peso ao nascimento e admissão na unidade de cuidados neonatais também foram avaliados. Os valores glicêmicos médios foram avaliados e comparados entre os dois grupos, no primeiro e segundo trimestres de gravidez. Apenas as gravidezes unifetais foram avaliadas.

Resultados A prevalência da obesidade foi de 13.6%. As grávidas obesas tiveram risco significativamente superior a ter uma cesariana (odds ratio ajustado [Ora] 2.0, p < 0.001), diabetes gestacional (ORa 2.14, p < 0.001), doenças hipertensivas da gravidez (ORa 3.43, p < 0.001), recém-nascidos grandes para a idade gestacional ou macrossômicos (ORa 2.13, p < 0.001) e menor probabilidade de ter recém-nascidos pequenos para a idade gestacional (ORa 0.51, p < 0.009). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa quanto aos partos pré-termo, mortes fetais/neonatais, baixo peso ao nascer e admissão à unidade de cuidados intensivos neonatais. O odds ratio foi ajustado para a idade, número de gestações, paridade, ganho ponderal, doenças hipertensivas da gravidez e diabetes gestacional. A obesidade materna esteve significativamente associada a valores glicêmicos médios superiores, no primeiro e segundo trimestres de gravidez.

Conclusão A obesidade está associada a maior risco de desfechos adversos na gravidez e neonatais. Este risco parece aumentar progressivamente com o aumento do índice de massa corporal (IMC). A obesidade feminina deve ser considerada um importante problema de saúde pública e que tem repercussões na saúde materno-fetal.

Contributions

All of the the authors contributed to the conception of the work and data collection. The analysis and interpretation of data was done by Alves P., Ferraz T., Malheiro M. F. and Gomes J. C.. The initial writing of the article was made by Alves P., Ferraz T. and Malheiro M. F. and was reviewed by Professor Montenegro N. and Gomes J. C.. All of the authors approved the final version of the article.


 
  • References

  • 1 World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory Data Repository. Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults, BMI ≥ 30, Age-Standardized Estimates by WHO Region: Europe: 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.REGION2480A?lang=en . Accessed February 19, 2019.
  • 2 World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory Data Repository. Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults, BMI ≥ 30, Age-Standardized Estimates by Country: Portugal: 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.CTRY2450A?lang=en . Accessed May 12, 2018.
  • 3 Sardinha LB, Santos DA, Silva AM. , et al. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity in a representative sample of Portuguese adults. PLoS One 2012; 7 (10) e47883 . Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047883
  • 4 Mitchell S, Shaw D. The worldwide epidemic of female obesity. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 29 (03) 289-299 . Doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.10.002
  • 5 Branca F, Nikogosian H, Lobstein T. The Challenge of Obesity in the WHO European Region and the Strategies for Response: Summary. Copenhagem: World Health Organization; 2007
  • 6 Mamun AA, Callaway LK, O'Callaghan MJ. , et al. Associations of maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and excess pregnancy weight gains with adverse pregnancy outcomes and length of hospital stay. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011; 11: 62 . Doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-62
  • 7 Lim CC, Mahmood T. Obesity in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 29 (03) 309-319 . Doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.10.008
  • 8 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulltein No 156: obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126 (06) e112-e126 . Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001211
  • 9 Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B. , et al; International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010; 33 (03) 676-682 . Doi: 10.2337/dc09-1848
  • 10 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Classification of hypertensive disorders. In: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in Pregnancy. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2013: 13-15
  • 11 Sousa-Santos RF, Miguelote RF, Cruz-Correia RJ, Santos CC, Bernardes JF. Development of a birthweight standard and comparison with currently used standards. What is a 10th centile?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 206: 184-193 . Doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.028
  • 12 Callaway LK, Prins JB, Chang AM, McIntyre HD. The prevalence and impact of overweight and obesity in an Australian obstetric population. Med J Aust 2006; 184 (02) 56-59 . Doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00115.x
  • 13 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 548: weight gain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (01) 210-212 . Doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000425668.87506.4c
  • 14 Ovesen P, Rasmussen S, Kesmodel U. Effect of prepregnancy maternal overweight and obesity on pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118 (2 Pt 1): 305-312 . Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182245d49
  • 15 Catalano PM, McIntyre HD, Cruickshank JK. , et al; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: associations of GDM and obesity with pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 2012; 35 (04) 780-786 . Doi: 10.2337/dc11-1790
  • 16 Baeten JM, Bukusi EA, Lambe M. Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women. Am J Public Health 2001; 91 (03) 436-440 . Doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.3.436
  • 17 World Health Organization. Human Reproduction Programme. WHO Statement on Cesarean Section Rates. Geneva: WHO; 2015
  • 18 OECD. Caesarean sections. In: OECD. Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD; 2013: 98-99
  • 19 Kominiarek MA, Vanveldhuisen P, Hibbard J. , et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (03) 264.e1-264.e7
  • 20 Al-Kubaisy W, Al-Rubaey M, Al-Naggar RA, Karim B, Mohd Noor NA. Maternal obesity and its relation with the cesarean section: a hospital based cross sectional study in Iraq. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 235 . Doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-235