Incidence of Normal versus Support Trot in the Healthy Adult German Shepherd DogFunding None.
23 January 2019
03 October 2019
08 January 2020 (online)
Introduction Current sports medicine textbooks suggest German Shepherd dogs leave a forelimb on the ground longer than other breeds for support because of angulated joints eliminating a true suspension phase (support trot). The objective of this study was to characterize the trot of healthy, adult German Shepherd dogs and describe morphometric relationships. The hypothesis was that all German Shepherd dogs have a standard trot that does not correlate with morphometric measurements.
Materials and Methods Forty healthy, adult German Shepherd dogs with no history of musculoskeletal disease or visible lameness were enrolled in this study. Height, weight, body length, standing limb distance and standing joint angles were measured. Dogs were trotted over a pressure walkway collecting five valid trials. Each trial was categorized by the presence or absence of the suspension phase and the percent of standard trot trials was calculated. Mean and standard deviations were calculated for all data. A Spearman's rank sum test was performed for each of the morphometric measurements to assess correlation with the percent of standard trot trials.
Results Of the dogs analysed, 37.5% demonstrated a standard trot in all five trials, 60% of dogs utilized a support trot intermittently, and one dog (2.5%) solely utilized a support trot in all trials. There was no correlation between combinations of morphometric measurements and percentage of standard trot statistically or visually.
Discussion/Conclusion This prospective clinical study showed that the use of the support trot was not correlated with morphometric measurements.
All authors contributed to the conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.
This study was presented at the 45th Annual Conference of the Veterinary Orthopedic Society, Snowmass Village, CO, United States, on March 12, 2018.
- 1 Zink CM, Van Dyke JB. Canine Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1st ed. Ames, IA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013: 21-22 , 178
- 2 Wendland TM, Martin KW, Duncan CG, Marolf AJ, Duerr FM. Evaluation of pacing as an indicator of musculoskeletal pathology in dogs. J Vet Med Anim Health 2016; 8: 207-213
- 3 Bockstahler BA, Skalicky M, Peham C, Müller M, Lorinson D. Reliability of ground reaction forces measured on a treadmill system in healthy dogs. Vet J 2007; 173 (02) 373-378
- 4 Gillette RL, Angle TC. Recent developments in canine locomotor analysis: a review. Vet J 2008; 178 (02) 165-176
- 5 Light VA, Steiss JE, Montgomery RD, Rumph PF, Wright JC. Temporal-spatial gait analysis by use of a portable walkway system in healthy Labrador Retrievers at a walk. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71 (09) 997-1002
- 6 Evans R, Horstman C, Conzemius M. Accuracy and optimization of force platform gait analysis in Labradors with cranial cruciate disease evaluated at a walking gait. Vet Surg 2005; 34 (05) 445-449
- 7 Miqueleto NS, Rahal SC, Agostinho FS, Siqueira EG, Araújo FA, El-Warrak AO. Kinematic analysis in healthy and hip-dysplastic German Shepherd dogs. Vet J 2013; 195 (02) 210-215
- 8 Tashman S, Anderst W, Kolowich P, Havstad S, Arnoczky S. Kinematics of the ACL-deficient canine knee during gait: serial changes over two years. J Orthop Res 2004; 22 (05) 931-941
- 9 Bertram JE, Lee DV, Todhunter RJ. Multiple force platform analysis of the canine trot: a new approach to assessing basic characteristics of motion. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10: 160-169
- 10 Brown CM, Dalzell B. Dog Locomotion and Gait Analysis. Wheat Ridge, CO: Hoflin Publishing Ltd.; 1986
- 11 Hildebrand M. Symmetrical gaits of dogs in relation to body build. J Morphol 1968; 124 (03) 353-360
- 12 Jaegger G, Marcellin-Little DJ, Levine D. Reliability of goniometry in Labrador Retrievers. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63 (07) 979-986
- 13 Voss K, Imhof J, Kaestner S, Montavon PM. Force plate gait analysis at the walk and trot in dogs with low-grade hindlimb lameness. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20 (04) 299-304
- 14 Allen K, De Camp CE, Braden TD. , et al. Kinematic gait analysis of the trot in healthy mixed breed dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 148-153
- 15 Boone DC, Azen SP, Lin CM, Spence C, Baron C, Lee L. Reliability of goniometric measurements. Phys Ther 1978; 58 (11) 1355-1360
- 16 Bertram JE, Lee DV, Case HN, Todhunter RJ. Comparison of the trotting gaits of Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61 (07) 832-838
- 17 Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Derrick TR, Ritter MJ. Comparison of vertical forces in normal greyhounds between force platform and pressure walkway measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 153-157
- 18 Voss K, Galeandro L, Wiestner T, Haessig M, Montavon PM. Relationships of body weight, body size, subject velocity, and vertical ground reaction forces in trotting dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (07) 863-869
- 19 Hof AL. Scaling gait data to body size. Gait Posture 1996; 4: 222-223
- 20 Hollenbeck L. The Dynamics of Canine Gait: A Study of Motion. Fairfax, VA: Denlingers Publishers; 1981
- 21 Kapatkin AS, Arbittier G, Kass PH, Gilley RS, Smith GK. Kinetic gait analysis of healthy dogs on two different surfaces. Vet Surg 2007; 36 (06) 605-608
- 22 McLaughlin RM. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001; 31 (01) 193-201
- 23 Jevens DJ, Hauptman JG, DeCamp CE, Budsberg SC, Soutas-Little RW. Contributions to variance in force-plate analysis of gait in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54 (04) 612-615