J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37(01): 067-074
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1701041
Original Article

Challenges of Setting up a Lower Extremity Reconstruction Practice in a Constrained Environment

1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, VM Medical Park Florya Hospital, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Ismail Karasoy
2   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gumushane State Hospital, Gumushane, Turkey
,
Yucel Genc
3   Department of Radiology, Gumushane State Hospital, Gumushane, Turkey
,
Ozgur Pilanci
4   Private Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background Microsurgical lower extremity reconstruction remains challenging, especially when resources are limited such as lack of proper equipment, human resources, administrative support, and located in a remote area far from tertiary care. Nevertheless, reconstructive solutions are required, especially when in urgent trauma situations. In this article, we evaluate ways of overcoming challenges and issues that should be considered in a newly established unit by sharing our initial lower extremity reconstruction experience.

Methods We report a local hospital's initial lower extremity reconstruction experience in February 2017 to January 2018. Through a total of seven patients, we tried to enhance the environment, instruments, nurses' contribution, and perspective of the peers and community in terms of factors related to the surgeon, hardware, environment, supporting faculty, reimbursement, and patients.

Results Four patients underwent reconstruction with a freestyle propeller flap and three with an anterolateral thigh flap; in one case, a superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap was chosen to salvage partial flap necrosis. Increased experience of the surgeon, new equipment, continuing nurse/patient education, and collaborating with other departments allowed us to choose more challenging flaps and be more meticulous while decreasing the operation time and hospital stay.

Conclusion To start a lower extremity reconstruction practice in a resource-poor environment, the surgeon needs to evaluate the relevant factors; moreover, he or she should continuously improve them until a working methodology is achieved. Despite all the challenges, the adaptations learned at this center can be applied to other local hospitals around the world to set up a lower extremity reconstruction practice and improve its outcomes.



Publication History

Received: 16 September 2019

Accepted: 02 December 2019

Article published online:
28 January 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Pu LL. A comprehensive approach to lower extremity free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (02) e1228
  • 2 Citron I, Galiwango G, Hodges A. Challenges in global microsurgery: a six year review of outcomes at an East African hospital. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (02) 189-195
  • 3 Giessler GA, Fieger A, Cornelius CP, Schmidt AB. Microsurgical reconstruction of noma-related facial defects with folded free flaps: an overview of 31 cases. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (02) 132-138
  • 4 Giessler GA, Schmidt AB. Noma: experiences with a microvascular approach under West African conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (04) 947-954 , discussion 955–956
  • 5 Mofikoya BO, Ugburo AO. Early experiences with microvascular free tissue transfer in Lagos, Nigeria. Niger J Surg 2014; 20 (01) 35-37
  • 6 Tashiro J, Gerth DJ, Thaller SR. Pedicled flap reconstruction for patients with pressure ulcers: complications and resource utilization by ulcer site. JAMA Surg 2016; 151 (01) 93-94
  • 7 Yazar S, Lin CH, Lin YT, Ulusal AE, Wei FC. Outcome comparison between free muscle and free fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction of distal third and ankle traumatic open tibial fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2468-2475 , discussion 2476–2477
  • 8 Acland R. Thrombus formation in microvascular surgery: an experimental study of the effects of surgical trauma. Surgery 1973; 73 (05) 766-771
  • 9 Wiechert K. Operating room setup and handling of surgical microscope: room and microscope setup. In: Mayer HM. ed. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Surgical Manual. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006: 23-25
  • 10 Attinger CE, Colen LB. The role of microsurgical free flaps in foot and ankle surgery. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2000; 17 (04) 649-680
  • 11 Chang TN, Hsieh F, Wang ZT, Kwon SH, Lin JA, Tang ET. Social media mediate the education of the global microsurgeons: the experience from International Microsurgery Club. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (05) 596-597
  • 12 Kwon SH, Lee CH, Hsu AT. et al. Use of social media and an online survey to discuss complex reconstructive surgery: a case of upper lip reconstruction with 402 responses from international microsurgeons. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (06) 413-419
  • 13 Lutz BS, Wei FC, Machens HG, Rhode U, Berger A. Indications and limitations of angiography before free-flap transplantation to the distal lower leg after trauma: prospective study in 36 patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2000; 16 (03) 187-191 , discussion 192
  • 14 Lutz BS, Ng SH, Cabailo R, Lin CH, Wei FC. Value of routine angiography before traumatic lower-limb reconstruction with microvascular free tissue transplantation. J Trauma 1998; 44 (04) 682-686
  • 15 Oluwatosin OM, Adigun IA, Shokunbi MT, Malomo AO, Komolafe EO, Olawoye OA. Problems of micro vascular free tissue transfer. Niger J Surg 2000; 7 (01) 29-31
  • 16 Pannucci CJ, Basta MN, Kovach SJ, Kanchwala SK, Wu LC, Serletti JM. Loupes-only microsurgery is a safe alternative to the operating microscope: an analysis of 1,649 consecutive free flap breast Reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (09) 636-642
  • 17 Shenaq SM, Klebuc MJ, Vargo D. Free-tissue transfer with the aid of loupe magnification: experience with 251 procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95 (02) 261-269
  • 18 Yaşargil MG. Microsurgery: Applied to Neurosurgery. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1969
  • 19 Heller L, Levin LS. Lower extremity microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (04) 1029-1041 , quiz 1042
  • 20 Haddock NT, Gobble RM, Levine JP. More consistent postoperative care and monitoring can reduce costs following microvascular free flap reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (07) 435-439
  • 21 Serafin D, Georgiade NG, Smith DH. Comparison of free flaps with pedicled flaps for coverage of defects of the leg or foot. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 59 (04) 492-499
  • 22 Househ M. The use of social media in healthcare: organizational, clinical, and patient perspectives. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013; 183: 244-248
  • 23 Applebaum MA, Doren EL, Ghanem AM, Myers SR, Harrington M, Smith DJ. Microsurgery competency during plastic surgery residency: an objective skills assessment of an integrated residency training program. Eplasty 2018; 18: e25
  • 24 Raju A, Ooi A, Ong YS, Tan BK. Traumatic lower limb injury and microsurgical free flap reconstruction with the use of negative pressure wound therapy: is timing crucial?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (06) 427-430
  • 25 Bradley PJ. Should all head and neck cancer patients be nursed in intensive therapy units following major surgery?. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 15 (02) 63-67
  • 26 Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2092-2100
  • 27 Wei FSS. Principles, and techniques of microvascular surgery: benefits and disadvantages. In: Mathes SJ. ed. Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006: 507-538
  • 28 Healy C, Allen Sr RJ. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (02) 121-125