Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10(05): 879-887
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700868
Research Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Evaluating the Impact of a New Smartphone Texting Tool on Patient Care in Obstetrics, an Emergent Healthcare Setting

Jacqueline Feinberg
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Sara Shaw
2   Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Nitu Kashyap
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Jessica Illuzzi
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Katherine Campbell
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Allen L. Hsiao
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Christian M. Pettker
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen


30. Mai 2019

18. September 2019

20. November 2019 (online)


Background Hospitals across the country are investing millions of dollars to adopt new Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant secure text messaging systems. However, in nearly all cases, these implementations are occurring without evaluation of their impact on patient care.

Objective To evaluate perceived impact on patient care and workflow of new text messaging system implemented in obstetrics at Yale-New Haven Hospital and to inform guidelines for future implementations in emergent settings.

Methods A new HIPAA-compliant texting system was implemented in obstetrics in 2016. Before implementation of the new system, residents and nurses were surveyed on perceived effect of communication system (pagers with text receiving, service mobile phones, personal cell phones) on clinical workflow and patient care using 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions. Following roll-out (1 and 6 months), both teams were surveyed with same questions. Results were compared using Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test (0–1 months and then 0–6 months). Open-ended question results were qualitatively compared for recurrent unifying themes.

Results In both nursing and resident domains, 1 month after implementation, the new communication system was perceived to significantly improve efficiency and patient care across all metrics. After 6 months, this effect decayed in nearly all categories (including efficiency, real-time communication, and knowledge of covering provider). The exception was nurse's knowledge of which resident to contact and resident's timely evaluation of patient, for which we observed sustained improvements. System shortcomings identified included interrupted connection (i.e., dropped calls), dysfunctional and inaccurate alert system, and unclear identification of the covering provider.

Conclusion A new text-messaging–based communication system may improve efficiency and patient care in emergent settings, but system shortcomings can substantially erode potential benefits over time. We recommend implementers evaluate new systems for a set of specific functional requirements to increase probability of sustained improvement and decrease risk of poor patient outcomes.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, and was exempted by University Institutional Review Board.

  • References

  • 1 Drolet BC. Text messaging and protected health information: What is permitted?. JAMA 2017; 317 (23) 2369-2370
  • 2 Thomas K. Wanted: a WhatsApp alternative for clinicians. BMJ 2018; 360: k622
  • 3 Leung TY, Chung PW, Rogers MS, Sahota DS, Lao TT-H, Hung Chung TK. Urgent cesarean delivery for fetal bradycardia. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (05) 1023-1028
  • 4 Leung TY, Lao TT. Timing of caesarean section according to urgency. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 27 (02) 251-267
  • 5 Hillemanns P, Hasbargen U, Strauss A, Schulze A, Genzel-Boroviczeny O, Hepp H. Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 minutes: evidence from 10 years. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2003; 268 (03) 136-141
  • 6 Schauberger CW. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108 (05) 1298
  • 7 Prabulos AM, Philipson EH. Umbilical cord prolapse. Is the time from diagnosis to delivery critical?. J Reprod Med 1998; 43 (02) 129-132
  • 8 Bujold E, Francoeur D. Neonatal morbidity and decision-delivery interval in patients with uterine rupture. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005; 27 (07) 671-673
  • 9 Przybylo JA, Wang A, Loftus P, Evans KH, Chu I, Shieh L. Smarter hospital communication: secure smartphone text messaging improves provider satisfaction and perception of efficacy, workflow. J Hosp Med 2014; 9 (09) 573-578
  • 10 Patel N, Siegler JE, Stromberg N, Ravitz N, Hanson CW. Perfect storm of inpatient communication needs and an innovative solution utilizing smartphones and secured messaging. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (03) 777-789
  • 11 Nguyen C, McElroy LM, Abecassis MM, Holl JL, Ladner DP. The use of technology for urgent clinician to clinician communications: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84 (02) 101-110
  • 12 Wu RC, Tran K, Lo V. , et al. Effects of clinical communication interventions in hospitals: a systematic review of information and communication technology adoptions for improved communication between clinicians. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81 (11) 723-732
  • 13 Patel MS, Patel N, Small DS. , et al. Change in length of stay and readmissions among hospitalized medical patients after inpatient medicine service adoption of mobile secure text messaging. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31 (08) 863-870
  • 14 Wu R, Rossos P, Quan S. , et al. An evaluation of the use of smartphones to communicate between clinicians: a mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13 (03) e59
  • 15 Hansen JE, Lazow M, Hagedorn PA. Reducing interdisciplinary communication failures through secure text messaging: a quality improvement project. Pediatr Qual Saf 2018; 3 (01) e053
  • 16 Gulacti U, Lok U. Comparison of secure messaging application (WhatsApp) and standard telephone usage for consultations on length of stay in the ED. A prospective randomized controlled study. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (03) 742-753
  • 17 Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. Committee opinion no. 629: clinical guidelines and standardization of practice to improve outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (04) 1027-1029
  • 18 Simpson A, Hodges R, Higgins M. Improving communication in obstetrics practice. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016; 38 (10) 961-964
  • 19 Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EH. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation 2009; 119 (10) 1442-1452
  • 20 Farag S, Chyjek K, Chen KT. Identification of iPhone and iPad applications for obstetrics and gynecology providers. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (05) 941-945
  • 21 Rippen HE, Pan EC, Russell C, Byrne CM, Swift EK. Organizational framework for health information technology. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82 (04) e1-e13
  • 22 Liu X, Sutton PR, McKenna R. , et al. Evaluation of secure messaging applications for a health care system: a case study. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 140-150
  • 23 Tsega S, Kalra A, Sevilla CT, Cho HJ. A bottom-up approach to encouraging sustained user adoption of a secure text messaging application. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (02) 326-330
  • 24 Hagedorn PA, Kirkendall ES, Spooner SA, Mohan V. Inpatient communication networks: leveraging secure text-messaging platforms to gain insight into inpatient communication systems. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (03) 471-478
  • 25 Haun JN, Hathaway W, Chavez M. , et al. Clinical practice informs secure messaging benefits and best practices. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (04) 1003-1011
  • 26 Moriates C, Wong BM. High-value care programmes from the bottom-up… and the top-down. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25 (11) 821-823