Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2020; 14(02): 327-330
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700660
Case Report

Resin Gingival Barrier as a Polymerizable Try-In Paste for Dynamic Try-In of Crowns and Veneers

Ahmed Abyad
1   Department of Oral Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon
,
Ziad Jarrah
2   Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon
,
Amin Hallak
2   Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon
,
Hala Ragab
2   Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon
,
Essam Osman
1   Department of Oral Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Try-in sessions are often performed to check the fit and shape of restorations; however, try-in pastes do not exhibit enough viscosity to keep the restoration in place especially in the case of veneers that keep falling off during try-in. The use of polymerizable soft resins similar to those used as a gingival barrier in bleaching treatment can lock the veneer or crown in place during try-in for dynamic assessment of the restoration, at the same time easy removal of the paste is possible since the resin film is peeled off in one piece leaving no residues for cleanup.

Keywords

ceramics - crowns - veneers - try-in


Publication History

Article published online:
12 March 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124 (02) 116-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rashid H.. The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: a review of literature. Eur J Dent 2014; 8 (04) 571-579
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Linhares LA, Pottmaier LF, Lopes GC. Fracture resistance of veneers in premolars. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (02) 191-198
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Matos AB, Oliveira DC, Vieira SN, Netto NG, Powers JM. Influence of oil contamination on in vitro bond strength of bonding agents to dental substrates. Am J Dent 2008; 21 (02) 101-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fleisch AF, Sheffield PE, Chinn C, Edelstein BL, Landrigan PJ. Bisphenol A and related compounds in dental materials. Pediatrics 2010; 126 (04) 760-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kong N, Jiang T, Zhou Z, Fu J. Cytotoxicity of polymerized resin cements on human dental pulp cells in vitro. Dent Mater 2009; 25 (11) 1371-1375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Söderholm KJ, Mariotti A. BIS-GMA--based resins in dentistry: are they safe?. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130 (02) 201-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gupta SK, Saxena P, Pant VA, Pant AB. Release and toxicity of dental resin composite. Toxicol Int 2012; 19 (03) 225-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Thompson WO. The effect of glaze on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 1992; 8 (03) 203-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 da Cunha LF, Reis R, Santana L, Romanini JC, Carvalho RM, Furuse AY. Ceramic veneers with minimum preparation. Eur J Dent 2013; 7 (04) 492-496
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar