Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2019; 16(01): 67-70
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700314
Award Paper
Neurotrauma Society of India

Outcome of “DESTITUTE” Head Injury Patients at a Tertiary Care Neurosurgical Centre: A KGMU Experience of 10 Years

Rohan Dilip Digarse
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Bal Krishna Ojha
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Anil Chandra
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Chhitij Srivastava
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Sunil Kumar Singh
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 October 2019 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Many patients are admitted to hospitals as destitute or unknown, after having met with accidents. What happens to these patients after admission is not much reported in world literature. With the ever increasing number of road traffic accidents (RTAs), a significant number of such patients are reported worldwide.

Material and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the departmental case records of destitute patients from January 2009 till December 2018 in our institute. The mode of presentation, demographic profile, computed tomography scan findings, hospital course, and outcome at discharge were analyzed.

Results Out of 128 patients, there were 114 (89.1%) male patients, maximum being in the 21 to 30 years age group. The mean age was 36.4 years with ages ranging from 10 to 70 years. The average length of stay in hospital was of approximately 6 days with maximum being 37 days. The main cause of head injury was RTA in 66 patients (51.5%). Majority, that is, 84 patients, had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of < 8 at admission. Forty-two head injury patients were operated in all, while the rest were managed conservatively. Forty-nine (38.2%) patients died in hospital, and 44 (34.3%) patients had good recovery. During treatment, 16 (12.5%) patients took discharge against medical advice, while identity of 63 (49.2%) patients could be established out of which 5 (3.9%) patients were either discharged to home while 51 (39.8%) patients were referred to their district hospital. Two patients (1.5%) remained unknown and were sent to destitute homes for rehabilitation.

Conclusion Unknown head injury patients are usually neglected and their outcome is poorer in comparison to other patients. Their management is fraught with challenges. They need special care for which staff should be well trained and hospital must have economic resources and a good network of social workers.

 
  • References

  • 1 The WHO mortality database and the WHO Global Burden of Disease (GBD). 2002 Version 1 database
  • 2 Kraus JF. Epidemiology. In: Frost E. ed Head Injury Management and Research. Geneva, Switzerland: AIREN; 1990: 113-124
  • 3 Thurman DJ, Alverson C, Dunn KA, Guerrero J, Sniezek JE. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1999; 14 (06) 602-615
  • 4 Edna TH, Cappelen J. Hospital admitted head injury. A prospective study in Trøndelag, Norway, 1979-80. Scand J Soc Med 1984; 12 (01) 7-14
  • 5 Fife D, Faich G, Hollinshead W, Boynton W. Incidence and outcome of hospital-treated head injury in Rhode Island. Am J Public Health 1986; 76 (07) 773-778
  • 6 Ramamurthi B. Road accidents, epidemiology and prevention. Neurol India 1995; 43: 9-15
  • 7 Mahapatra AK. Current management of head injury. Neuroscience Today 1997; 1: 197-204
  • 8 Kalyanaraman S. Organization of a head injury services. Ann Ind Aca Med Sci 1971; 7: 1-3
  • 9 Guerrero JL, Thurman DJ, Sniezek JE. Emergency department visits associated with traumatic brain injury: United States, 1995-1996. Brain Inj 2000; 14 (02) 181-186
  • 10 Thurman D, Guerrero J. Trends in hospitalization associated with traumatic brain injury. JAMA 1999; 282 (10) 954-957
  • 11 National Road Safety Policy. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. 2010. Available at: https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/f iles/National_Road_Safety_Policy.pdf. Accessed October 10, 2019
  • 12 Sahni P, Bhattacharya AK, Nundy S. et al. Head injuries: a neglected field in India. Natl Med J 1991; 4: 44-53
  • 13 Becker DP, Povlishock JT. Central Nervous System Trauma Status Report. National Institute of Health and Communicative Disorders and Stroke. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health; 1986
  • 14 Ahmad FU, Mahapatra AK, Mehta VS. Outcome of “unknown” head injury patients at a tertiary care neurosurgical centre. Neurol India 2006; 54 (01) 73-74
  • 15 Wagner AK, Sasser HC, Hammond FM, Wiercisiewski D, Alexander J. Intentional traumatic brain injury: epidemiology, risk factors, and associations with injury severity and mortality. J Trauma 2000; 49 (03) 404-410
  • 16 Lannoo E, Van Rietvelde F, Colardyn F. et al. Early predictors of mortality and morbidity after severe closed head injury. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17 (05) 403-414
  • 17 Bulger EM, Nathens AB, Rivara FP, Moore M, MacKenzie EJ, Jurkovich GJ. Brain Trauma Foundation. Management of severe head injury: institutional variations in care and effect on outcome. Crit Care Med 2002; 30 (08) 1870-1876
  • 18 Liew BS, Johari SA, Nasser AW, Abdullah J. Severe traumatic brain injury: outcome in patients with diffuse axonal injury managed conservatively in Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Johor Bahru–an observational study. Med J Malaysia 2009; 64 (04) 280-288