Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2011; 44(01): 076-080
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699483
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

A modified technique for nipple-areola complex reconstruction

Shoeib A. Mohamed
Department of Plastic Surgery, Sohag University, Egypt, Italy
,
Peir Camillo Parodi
1   Udine University, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Background: From a historical perspective, many techniques of nipple reconstruction have been performed, including a graft from the contralateral nipple, composite grafts such as toe pulp or earlobe tissue and even an intra-dermal tattoo alone. This is the final stage of breast reconstruction, and is carried out only when the surgeon is confident that acceptable symmetry and shape of the reconstructed breast has been achieved. The technical challenges of nipple reconstruction include correcting position, maintaining adequate projection and creating an inconspicuous scar. An alternative to a surgically reconstructed nipple is the use of silicone prosthetic nipples. Materials and Methods: From August 2006 until September 2007, 80 cases of nipple/areola reconstruction were performed in our department (UDINE UNIV.) following mammary reconstruction or conservative breast surgery. Forty cases were carried out with the classical technique and another 40 cases with the introduction of our modification in the form of deepithelization of a semicircular area of the adjacent skin at the base of the flap. Postoperative follow-up as regards the nipple size, site, projection, symmetry and donnar scar were assessed. Patient satisfaction was also addressed and evaluated. Results: There were good to excellent results as regards nipple size, symmetry and projection. The technique is suitable for different autologous and implant reconstruction. The technique is an outpatient procedure, is easy and is not consuming time. Areolar graft from the contra-lateral areola is colouur matching and shows nearly no deference from the opposite one. Conclusions: Simple technique and not time consuming. Maintains the consistency and projection of the new nipple. Patient satisfaction. Minimal complication.

KEY WORDS

Areola - breast - niple - reconstruction
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, Peters S, Shestak A, Kim J. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: A comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:780-6.
  • 2 Bhatty MA, Berry RB. Nipple-areola reconstruction by tattooing and nipple sharing. Br J Plast Surg 1997;50:331-4.
  • 3 Tanabe HY, Tai Y, Kiyokawa K, Yamauchi T. Nipple-areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap and rolled auricular cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:431-8.
  • 4 Banducci DR, Le TK, Hughes KC. Long-term follow-up of a modified Anton-Hartrampf nipple reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1999;43:467-9.
  • 5 Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW 3rd. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:699-704.
  • 6 Wong RK, Feldman S, Banducci DR. A modification of the Anton-Hartrampf star flap using pre-reconstruction tattooing. Perspect Plast Surg 1993;7:137.
  • 7 Little JW. Nipple-areolar reconstruction. In: Spear SL, editor. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publisher; 1998.
  • 8 Kroll SS. Nipple reconstruction with the double opposing flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:511-4.
  • 9 Eskenazi L. A one-stage nipple reconstruction with the “modified star” flap and immediate tattoo: A review of 100 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;92:671-80.
  • 10 Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL, Baldwin BJ, et al. Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99: 1602-5.
  • 11 Losken A, Mackay GJ, Bostwick J 3rd. Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: A long-term evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:361-9.
  • 12 Little JW. Nipple-areolar reconstruction. In: Cohen M, editor. Mastery of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Vol 2. Boston: Little, Brown; 1994. Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone R. B, Little JW 3rd. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:699-704.
  • 13 Few JW, Marcus JR, Casas LA, Aitken ME, Redding J. Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1321-4.
  • 14 abor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areolar reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plas Reconstr Surg 2002;110:457-63.
  • 15 Hammond DC, Khuthaila D, Kim J. The skate flap purse-string technique for nipple-areola complex reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:399-406.