CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2011; 44(01): 055-058
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699481
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Effect of static wrist position on grip strength

Praveen Bhardwaj
Department of Plastic, Hand, Burns and Reconstructive Microsurgery
,
Saumyakumar S. Nayak
Department of Plastic, Hand, Burns and Reconstructive Microsurgery
,
Asif M. Kiswar
1   Department of Physiotherapy, Plastic, Hand, Burns and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
S. Raja Sabapathy
Department of Plastic, Hand, Burns and Reconstructive Microsurgery
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Background: Grip strength after wrist arthrodesis is reported to be significantly less than normal. One of the reasons suggested for this decrease in grip strength is that the arthrodesis was performed in a suboptimal position. However, there is no consensus on the ideal position of wrist fusion. There is a paucity of studies evaluating the effect of various fixed positions of the wrist on grip strength and therefore, there is no guide regarding the ideal position of wrist fusion. The authors’ aim was to determine the grip strength in various fixed positions of the wrist and subsequently to find out in which position of wrist fusion the grip strength would be maximal. Materials and Methods: One hundred healthy adults participated in the study. For the purpose of this study, the authors constructed splints to hold the wrist in five different fixed positions: 45, 30 and 15 degrees of wrist extension, neutral and 30 degrees of wrist flexion. The grip strength in all the participants was measured bilaterally, first without a splint and then with each splint sequentially. Results: The average grip strength without the splint was 34.3 kg for right and 32.3 kg for the left hand. Grip strength decreased by 19–25% when the wrist was splinted. The maximum average grip strength with a splint on was recorded at 45 degrees of extension (27.9 kg for right and 26.3 kg for left side). There was a gradual increase in the grip strength with increase in wrist extension but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.29). The grip strength was significantly less in flexed position of the wrist (P < 0.001).

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Rayan G, Brentlinger A, Purnell D, Garcia-Moral CA. Functional assessment of bilateral wrist arthrodesis. J Hand Surg 1987;12: 1020-4.
  • 2 Wright C, McMurthy R. AO arthrodesis in the hand. J Hand Surg 1983;8:932-5.
  • 3 Louis DS, Hankin FM. Arthrodesis of the wrist: Past and present. J Hand Surg 1986;11:787-9.
  • 4 Hastings H II. Wrist- Arthrodesis (Partial and complete) in Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingston Publication; 2005. p. 489-534.
  • 5 Viegas S, Rimoldi R, Patterson R. Modified technique of intramedullary fixation for wrist arthrodesis. J Hand Surg 1989;14:618-23.
  • 6 O'Driscoll SW, Horii E, Ness R, Cahalan TD, Richards RR, An KN. The relationship between wrist position, grasp size, and grip strength. J Hand Surg Am 1992;17:169-77.
  • 7 Leighton RK, Petrie D. Arthrodesis of the wrist. Can J Surg 1987;30:115-6.
  • 8 Netscher D, Steadman AK, Thornby J, Cohen V. Temporal changes in grip and pinch strength after open carpal tunnel release and the effect of ligament reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 1998;23:48-54.
  • 9 Mathur K, Pynsent PB, Vohra SB, Thomas B, Deshmukh SC. Effect of wrist position on power grip and key pinch strength following carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Br 2004;29:390-2.
  • 10 Pryce J. The wrist position between neutral and ulnar deviation that facilitates the maximum power grip strength. J Biomech 1980;13:505-11.