CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2010; 43(01): 042-048
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699402
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Analysis of facial bone fractures: An 11-year study of 2,094 patients

Kun Hwang
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
2   Center for Advanced Medical Education by BK21 Project, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
,
Sun Hye You
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 January 2020 (online)

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The medical records of these patients were reviewed and analysed to determine the clinical characteristics and treatment of facial bone fractures. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study of 2,094 patients with facial bone fractures from various accidents that were treated at the Inha University Hospital from 1996 to 2007. Results: The most common age group was the third decade of life (29%). Males were more common than females (3.98:1). The most common aetiology was violent assault or nonviolent traumatic injury (49.4%). The most common isolated fracture site was the nasal bone (37.7%), followed by the mandible (30%), orbital bones (7.6%), zygoma (5.7%), maxilla (1.3%) and the frontal bone (0.3%). The largest group with complex fractures included the inferior region of the orbital floor and zygomaticomaxilla (14%). Closed reduction was performed in 46.3% of the cases while 39.7% of the cases required open reduction. For open reductions, the most commonly used soft-tissue approach was the intraoral approach (32.3%). The complication rate was 6.4% and the most common complication was hypoesthesia (68.4%) followed by diplopia (25.6%). Conclusion: Long-term collection of epidemiological data regarding facial fractures and concomitant injuries is important for the evaluation of existing preventive measures and useful in the development of new methods of injury prevention and treatment.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Erol B, Tanrikulu R, Görgün B. Maxillofacial fractures: Analysis of demographic distribution and treatment in 2901 patients (25-year experience). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004;32:308-13.
  • 2 Bataineh AB. Etiology and incidence of maxillofacial fractures in the north of Jordan. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:31-5.
  • 3 Iida S, Matsuya T. Paediatric maxillofacial fractures: Their aetiological characters and fracture patterns. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002;30:237-41.
  • 4 van Hoof RF, Merkx CA, Stekelenburg EC. The different patterns of fractures of the facial skeleton in four European countries. Int J Oral Surg 1977; 6:3-11.
  • 5 Hogg NJ, Stewart TC, Armstrong JE, Girotti MJ. Epidemiology of maxillofacial injuries at trauma hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 1992 and 1997. J Trauma 2000;49:425-32.
  • 6 Lee JH, Mun GH, Bang SI. A clinical and statistical analysis of the facial bone fractures: 7 years survey. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;25:1046-52.
  • 7 Lim KW, Kim JC, Kim SH, Kim SH. A clinical and statistical analysis of the facial bone fractures: From 1994 to 1998. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;109:1151-9.
  • 8 Gassner R, Tuli T, Hächl O, Rudisch A, Ulmer H. Cranio-Maxillofacial trauma: A 10 year review of 9,543 cases with 21,067 injuries. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003;31:51-61.
  • 9 Hayter JP, Cawood JI. The functional case for miniplates in maxillofacial surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;22:91-6.
  • 10 Knight JS, North JF. The classification of malar fractures: An analysis of displacement as a guide to treatment. Br J Plast Surg 1961;13:325-39.
  • 11 Zingg M, Laedrach K, Chen J, Chowdhury K, Vuillemin T, Sutter F, et al. Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures: A review of 1,025 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:778-90.
  • 12 Manolidis S, Weeks BH, Kirby M, Scarlett M, Hollier L. Classification and surgical management of orbital fractures: Experience with 111 orbital reconstructions. J Craniofac Surg 2002;13:726-37; discussion 738.
  • 13 Lim KW, Kim JC, Kim SH, Kim SH. A clinical and statistical analysis of the facial bone fractures: From 1994 to 1998. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;109:1151-9.
  • 14 Lee JH, Mun GH, Bang SI. A clinical and statistical analysis of the facial bone fractures: 7 years survey. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;25:1046-52.
  • 15 Kim JD, Kim TY, Chung CE. A clinical and statistical analysis of the facial bone fractures (excluding the nasal bone). J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;19:38-47.