Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2009; 42(02): 169-175
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699338
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

The pedicled thoraco-umbilical flap: A versatile technique for upper limb coverage

Sharad Mishra
Department of Plastic Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Ramesh Kumar Sharma
Department of Plastic Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 January 2020 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Injuries to upper limb has been on the increase and is invariably associated with significant soft tissue loss requiring a flap cover. Local tissue may not be available for cover in a majority of situations, necessitating import of tissue from a distant source. We have utilized the thoraco-umbilical flap taken from the trunk for this purpose. This flap is based on the perforators of the deep inferior epigastric artery that are maximally centred on the periumbilical region. This flap was used in 83 patients. The patients were observed for at least 3 weeks and any flap or donor site complications were recorded. The patients were again followed up at 3 months interval and the donor site scar was assessed. The flaps survived in 81 patients; there was marginal flap necrosis in five patients and partial flap necrosis in two patients. None of these patients required any additional procedure for coverage. The flap is technically easy to plan, almost effortless to drape around upper limb defects, with no significant donor site morbidity and also the post operative immobilization was fairly comfortable. The thoraco-umbilical flap thus is a very useful technique for coverage of the upper limb and is recommended as a first line flap for this purpose.

KEY WORDS

Upper limb soft tissue defects - thoraco-umbilical flap - periumbilical perforators - deep inferior epigastric artery
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 McGregor IA, Jackson IT. The groin flap. Br J Plast Surg 1972;25:3-16.
  • 2 Taylor GI, Daniel RK. The anatomy of several free flap donor sites. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975;56:243-53.
  • 3 Boyd JB, Taylor GI, Corlett R. The vascular territories of the superior epigastric and deep inferior epigastric system. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73:1-14.
  • 4 Taylor GI, Corlett R, Boyd JB. The extended deep inferior epigastric flap: A clinical technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;72:751-64.
  • 5 Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Boyd JB. The versatile deep inferior epigastric flap. Br J Plast Surg 1984;37:330-50.
  • 6 Boyd JB, Mackinnon SE. An evaluation of pedicled thoraco umbilical flap in upper extremity reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1989;22:236-42.
  • 7 Fan QS. The anatomy and application of the thoracoumbilical flap. Chin J Microsurg 1987;10:129-32.
  • 8 Fan QS. The thoraco-umbilical flap for a large skin defect on hand and forearm. Chin J Hand Surg 1992;8:21-4.
  • 9 Fan QS. The anatomy and application of the thoracoumbilical flap. Chin J Microsurg 1987;10:129-32.
  • 10 Zhang XQ, Wang SD, Fan QY, Mao BA, Zhou Y, Zhang MH. Thoracoumbilical flap: experience with 33 flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004;20:133-7.
  • 11 El-Mrakby HH, Milner RH. The suprafascial course of the direct paraumbilical perforators vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:1766-8.
  • 12 Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. Cadaver studies of correlation between vessel size and anatomical territory of cutaneous supply. Br J Plast Surg 1986;39:300-6.
  • 13 Yilmaz S, Saydam M, Seven E, Ercocen AR. Paraumbilical perforator-based pedicled abdominal flap for extensive soft-tissue deficiencies of the forearm and hand. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54:365-8.
  • 14 Rensis L. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology 1932;140:1-55.
  • 15 Sharma RK, Mehrotra S, Nanda V. The perforator plus flap: a simple nomenclature for locoregional perforator based flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116;1838-9. Further discussion and comment in Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1864-5; author reply 1866-7.