CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2009; 42(01): 004-012
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699304
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

A study of the use of the supraclavicular artery flap for resurfacing of head, neck, and upper torso defects

Parag Telang
1  Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, India
,
Mukund Jagannathan
1  Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, India
,
Maksud Devale
1  Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 January 2020 (online)

ABSTRACT

The head and neck region is an aesthetically demanding area to resurface because of its high visibility. Tissue defects in this area often require distant flaps or free flaps to achieve an aesthetically acceptable result. The use of the Supraclavicular artery flap represents an extremely versatile and useful option for the resurfacing of head, neck and upper torso defects. Furthermore, islanding the flap gives it a wide arc of rotation and the color and texture match is superior to that of free flaps harvested from distant sites. In our study, we used the flap (both unexpanded and expanded) predominantly for resurfacing neck defects resulting from the release of post-burn contractures. However, its applicability in other indications would also be similar. Except one, all our flaps survived almost completely and the post-operative morbidity was very low. We conclude that the supraclavicular artery flap not only provides a reasonably good color and texture match but also maintains the multi-directional activity in the neck region.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Achauer BM. Neck Reconstruction. In: Achauer BM, editor Burn Reconstruction. New York: Thieme; 1991. p. 79-86.
  • 2 Hyakusoku H, Gao JH. The “super-thin” flap. Br J Plast Surg 1994;47:457-64.
  • 3 Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H, Murakami M. Color Doppler ultrasonography in the planning of microvascular augmented super-thin (SVN: Subdermal vascular network) flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:822-8.
  • 4 Rose EH. Aesthetic restoration of the severely disfigured face in burn victims: A comprehensive strategy. Plast Reconstr Surg1995;96:1573-85.
  • 5 Mimoun M, Kirsch JM, Faivre JM, Baux S. Rebuilding the cervico- mandibular angle: Correcting a deformity of neck burns. Burns Incl Therm Inj 1986;12:264-9.
  • 6 Pallua N, Machens HG, Liebau J, Berger A. Treatment of mentosternal contractures by flap-plasty. Chirurg 1996;67: 850-5.
  • 7 Gillies HD. The tubed pedicle in plastic surgery. J Laryngol Otol 1923;38:503-03.
  • 8 Aufricht G. Evaluation of pedicle flaps versus skin grafts in reconstruction of surface defects and scar contractures of the chin, cheeks, and neck. Surgery 1944;15:75.
  • 9 Rashid M, Zia-Ul-Islam M, Sarwar SU, Bhatti AM. The'expansile supraclavicular artery flap for release of post-burn neck contractures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59: 1094-101.
  • 10 Kazanjian VH, Converse JM. The Surgical Treatment of Facial Injuries. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1949.
  • 11 Demergasso F, Piazza MV. Trapezius myocutaneous flap in reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer: An original technique. Am J Surg 1979;138:533-6.
  • 12 Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Clinical Atlas of Muscle and Musculocutaneous Flaps. St. Louis: Mosby; 1979.
  • 13 Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Clinical Applications for Muscle and Musculocutaneous Flaps. St. Louis: Mosby; 1982.
  • 14 Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Reconstructive Surgery: Principles, Anatomy and Technique. New York: Churchill Livingstone;1997. p. 10-2.
  • 15 Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. The anatomical vascular basis of the axillary fasciocutaneous pedicle flap. Br J Plast Surg 1983;36:425-27.
  • 16 Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. A classification of fascio-cutaneous flaps according to their patterns of vascularization. Br J Plast Surg 1984;37:80-7.
  • 17 Mathes SJ, Vasconez LO. The cervico-humeral flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;61:7-12.
  • 18 Wilson CA. The cervicohumeral flap (Letter). Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;62:288.
  • 19 Lamberty BG. The supra-clavicular axial patterned flap. Br J Plast Surg 1979;32:207-12.
  • 20 Lamberty BG, Cormack GC. Misconceptions regarding the cervicohumeral flap. Br J Plast Surg 1983;36:60-3.
  • 21 Pallua N, Machens HG, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A. The fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1878-84.
  • 22 Pallua N, Magnus Noah E. The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: An optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:842-51.
  • 23 Cormack CG, Lamberty BG. The Arterial Anatomy of Skin Flaps. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.
  • 24 Vinh VQ, Ogawa R, Van Anh T, Hyakusoku H. Reconstruction of Neck Scar Contractures using Supraclavicular flaps: Retrospective Study of 30 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:130-5.