CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2008; 41(01): 24-33
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699223
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

The extended latissimus dorsi flap option in autologous breast reconstruction: A report of 14 cases and review of the literature

Mohammed A. Rifaat
Department of Surgery, King Fahd Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
,
Ayman A. Amin
1   National Cancer Institute, Cairo University,Fom el Khalig, Cairo
,
Mahmoud A Bassiouny
1   National Cancer Institute, Cairo University,Fom el Khalig, Cairo
,
Ayman Nabawi
2   Alexandria University, Raml station, Alexandria, Egypt
,
Sherif Monib
1   National Cancer Institute, Cairo University,Fom el Khalig, Cairo
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 January 2020 (online)

ABSTRACT

Background: Autologous breast reconstruction using the extended latissimus dorsi flap has been infrequently reported. in the current study, the authors are reporting their own clinical experience with this method. a review of the literature is also discussed.Materials and methods: Over a three year period, 14 patients underwent breast reconstruction using the extended latissimus dorsi (ld) flap. patients with small to medium sized breasts were selected. the age of the patients ranged from 29 to 42 years with a follow-up period ranging from six to 18 months. the indications, flap-related complications and donor site morbidity and aesthetic results were evaluated.Results: The main indication to use the flap was dorsal donor site preference by patients. the remaining patients were either not suitable for a flap from the abdomen or wished to get pregnant and were offered the dorsal donor site. neither total nor partial flap loss was recorded but donor site morbidity was mainly due to seroma, which was treated conservatively in all patients, except for one who required surgery. another two patients suffered from wound breakdown and distal necrosis of the back flaps. mild contour deformity was also noted on the back of all patients but caused no major concern. indeed, the overall patient satisfaction was very high.Conclusion: The extended ld flap proved to be a good option for autologous breast reconstruction in selected patients. patients should be warned of the potential for seroma and mild contour back deformity.

 
  • 1 Kurtz J, Amalric K, Brandone H, Ayme Y, Jacquemier J, Pietra JC. et.al. Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: Frequency, time, course and prognosis. Cancer 1989; 63: 1912-7
  • 2 Trabulsy PP, Anthony JP, Mathes SJ. Changing trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A 13-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 1418-27
  • 3 Beasley ME. The pedicled TRAM as preference for immediate autogenous tissue breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1994; 21: 191-205
  • 4 Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Smith B. Breast reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps in previously irradiated patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 460-71
  • 5 Blondeel PN, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Lysens R. et.al. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50: 322-30
  • 6 Allen RJ. Perforator flaps in breast reconstruction. In: Spear SL. editor. Surgery of the breast: Principles and art. Lippincott-Raven; Philadelphia: 1998: p.605-25
  • 7 Chang DW, Youssef A, Cha S, Reece GP. Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 751-9
  • 8 Germann G, Steinau HU. Breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 519-26
  • 9 Marshall DR, Anstee EJ, Stapleton MJ. Soft tissue reconstruction of the breast using an extended composite latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37: 361-8
  • 10 Papp C, Zanon E, McCraw J. Breast volume replacement using the deepithelialized latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Eur J Plast Surg 1988; 11: 120-5
  • 11 Barnett GR, Gianoutsos MP. The latissimus dorsi added fat flap for natural tissue breast reconstruction: Report of 15 Cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 63-70
  • 12 Delay E, Gounot N, Bouillot A, Zlatoff P, Rivoire M. Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: A 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1461-78
  • 13 Aitken ME, Mustoe TA. Why change a good thing? Revisiting the fleur-de-lis reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 525-33
  • 14 Olivari N.. The latissimus flap. Br J Plast Surg 1976; 29: 126-8
  • 15 Schneider WJ, Kurtz J, Hill Jr HL, Brown RG. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1977; 30: 277-81
  • 16 Smith BK, Cohen BE, Biggs TM, Suber J. Simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps: A retrospective review of an institutional experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1174-81
  • 17 McCraw JB, Maxwell GP. Early and late capsular "deformation" as a cause of unsatisfactory results in the latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1988; 15: 717-26
  • 18 DeMey A, Lejour M, Declety A, Meythiaz AM. Late results and current indications of latissimus dorsi breast reconstructions. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44: 1-4
  • 19 Hokin JA. Mastectomy reconstruction without a prosthetic implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 810-8
  • 20 Hokin JA, Silfverskiold KL. Breast reconstruction without an implant: Results and complications using an extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79: 58-66
  • 21 McCraw JB, Papp C, Edwards A, McMellin A. The autogenous latissimus breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1994; 21: 279-88
  • 22 Papp C, McCraw JB. Autogenous latissimus breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 25: 261-6
  • 23 Heitmann C, Pelzer M, Kuentscher M, Menke H, Germann G. The extended latissimus dorsi flap revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 1697-701
  • 24 Menke H, Erkens M, Olbrisch RR. Evolving concepts in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps: Results and follow-up of 121 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47: 107-14
  • 25 Roy MK, Shrotia S, Holcombe C, Webster DJ, Hughes LE, Mansel RE. Complications of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 1998; 24: 162-5
  • 26 Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Müller H, Friese K. Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap: i0 mproved aesthetic results after transection of its humeral insertion. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 1876-81
  • 27 Watterson PA, Bostwick 3rd J, Hester Jr TR, Bried JT, Taylor GI. TRAM flap anatomy correlated with a 10 year clinical experience with 556 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95: 1185-94
  • 28 Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy: Current issues. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 950-60
  • 29 Shaikh-Naidu N, Preminger BA, Rogers K, Messina P, Gayle LB. Determinants of aesthetic satisfaction following TRAM and implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52: 465-70
  • 30 Mathes SJ, Ueno CM. Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex. In: Mathes SJ, Hentz VR. editors. Plastic Surgery.. 2. nd ed. Saunders Elsevier; Philadelphia: 2006: p.793
  • 31 Johnson RM, Barney LM, King JC. Vaginal delivery of monozygotic twins after bilateral pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 1653-54
  • 32 Collin TW, Coady MS. Is pregnancy contraindicated following free TRAM breast reconstruction?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59: 556-59
  • 33 Titley OG, Spyrou GE, Fatah MF. Preventing seroma in the latissimus dorsi flap donor site. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50: 106-8
  • 34 Russell RC, Pribaz J, Zook EG, Leighton WD, Eriksson E, Smith CJ. Functional evaluation of latissimus dorsi donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78: 336-44