CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2007; 40(02): 182-188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699200
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

What is the best choice for repair of distal penile hypospadias: The tubularized incised plate urethroplasty or anterior urethral advancement technique?

Mohamed M.S Awad
Plastic Unit, Surgical Department, Zagazig Universty Hospitals, Egypt Zagazig
,
Adel M Tolba
,
Khaled M Saad
,
Zaghlol R Mahmoud
,
Ahmed Ezzat Rozigque
,
Osama H Gharib
,
Saalim A Khalil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
15. Januar 2020 (online)

ABSTRACT

Background and Aim: Numerous ingenious methods have been introduced to repair hypospadias with variable results. we tried to evaluate the two techniques, tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (tip) and anterior urethral advancement (aua) for repair of distal hypospadias and choose the best method to treat the distal type of penile hypospadias with the least complications.Materials and methods :A total of 140 boys with distal penile hypospadias were divided into two groups. group a (68 patients) was treated with tip and group b (72 patients) was treated with aua. all the patients had an average age of three years (2-19) with variable meatal sites coronal (44) sub coronal (53) and anterior penile hypospadias (43). there was no significant difference between both groups with respect to the age and meatal sites.Results: The fistula rate in group a was 8.8% versus 1.3% in group b. there was no urethral stricture in both procedures. wound dehiscence did not occur in group a versus one case in group b (1.3%). in group a, 26 cases (38.3%) had mild glanular torsion and five (7.3%) had moderate glanular torsion versus none in group b postoperatively. no postoperative chordee or binding in group a, versus four patients (5.5%) in group b. no significant difference was observed in both groups with respect to meatal stenosis (7.3% versus 5.5% respectively). there was a significant difference between both groups with regard to the operative time in favour of group b. good cosmetic appearance of the glans was achieved in both techniques.Conclusion: Both techniques can treat this anomaly with a high success rate but the modified aua technique appears to be a good choice due to its simplicity, short operative time and less fistula rate with good cosmetic results.

 
  • 1 Latifoglu O, Yavuzer R, Unal S, Cavusoglu T, Atabay K. Surgical treatment of urethral fistulas following hypospadias repair. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 44: 381-6
  • 2 Shankar KR, Losty PD, Hopper M, Wong L, Rickwood AM. Outcome of hypospadias fistula repair. BJU Int 2002; 89: 103-5
  • 3 Snodgrass W. Tubularized, incised plate urethroplastyfor distal hypospadias. J Urol 1994; 151: 464-5
  • 4 Chang TS. Anterior advancement a one stage technique for hypospadias repair. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37: 530
  • 5 Landau EH, Gofrit ON, Meretyk S, Katz G, Golijanin D, Shenfeld OZ. et al. Outcome analysis of tunica vaginalis flap for the correction of recurrent urethrocutaneous fistula in children. J Urol 2003; 170: 1596-9
  • 6 Masterson JS, Johnson HW, Coleman GU, Ettinger SL, McLoughlin MG. The development of microsurgical techniques in experimental and clinical repair of urethrocutaneous fistulas. J Urol 1982; 128: 285-6
  • 7 Leclair MD, Camby C, Battisti S, Renaud G, Plattner V, Heloury Y. Unstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty combined with foreskin reconstruction for distal hypospadias. Eur Urol 2004; 46: 526-30
  • 8 Snyder CL, Evangelidis A, Hansen G, St SDPeter, Ostlie DJ, Gatti JM. et al. Management of complications after hypospadias repair. Urology 2005; 65: 782-5
  • 9 Nguyen MT, Snodgrass WT. Tubularized incised plate hypospadias reoperation. J Urol 2004; 171: 2404-6
  • 10 El MMSaadi. Anterior urethral advancement technique for repair of hypospadias Modifications. Zagazig Med Assoc J 2001; 2: 24-6
  • 11 Elicevik M, Tireli G, Sander S. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: 5 years’ experience. Eur Urol 2004; 46: 655-9
  • 12 Elbakry A. Tubularized-incised urethral plate urethroplasty: Is regular dilatation necessary for success?. BJU Int 1999; 84: 683-8
  • 13 Snodgrass WT. Re: Effect of the depth and width of the urethral plate on tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. J Urol 2001; 166: 633
  • 14 Snodgrass W, Koyle M, Manzoni G, Hurwitz R, Caldamone A, Ehrlich R. Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: Results of a multicenter experience. J Urol 1996; 156: 839-41
  • 15 Elbakry A. Further experience with the tubularized-incised urethral plate technique for hypospadias repair. BJU Int 2002; 89: 291-4
  • 16 Kamal BA. A double dartos flaps in tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair. Urology 2005; 66: 1095-8
  • 17 El MTSherbiny. Tubularized incised plate repair of distal hypospadias in toilet trained children: Should a stent be left?. BJU Int 2003; 92: 1003-5
  • 18 Awad MS. Urethral advancement technique for repair of distal penile hypospadias: Revisit. Indian J Plast Surg 2006; 39: 48-53