Soft tissue reinforcement interposition flaps in hypospadias repair

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To discuss the role and mechanism of action of soft tissue reinforcement interposition flaps (strifs) in hypospadias repairs (reinforced hypospadiac urethroplasties). Materials and methods: between 2000-2005, 120 consecutive hypospadiacs (distal 85, mid 20, proximal 15), who underwent primary reinforced urethroplasties employing different types of strifs, were retrospectively analyzed. the strifs were highly vascular soft tissue pedicled flaps (devoid of epithelium) interposed between neo-urethras and the covering skin to reinforce the neo-urethras against fistula formation. the strifs were harvested, without much donor site deformity, from: preputial skin, penile skin and scrotal skin by de-epithelialization. those from buck′s fascia, corpus spongiosum and tunica vaginalis are strifs without epithelium anyway, therefore do not need de-epithelialization. redo urethroplasties and micropenises were not included. seven patients were excluded because they had incomplete follow-up. the remaining 113 (distal 84, mid 17, proximal 12) were followed up for nine to 40 months for number, size, location, spontaneous closure and persistence of urethro-cutaneous fistula (ucf), and other complications with regard to the severity of hypospadias, method of neourethral re-construction, types of strifs employed and skin cover used. a total of 158 strifs and 124 skin covers were used in 113 hypospadiac urethroplasties. Results: the first surgery was curative in 74 (65%) of 113 patients. in the remaining 39 (35%), various complications included 12 urethro-cutaneous fistulas (ucfs), 10 urethral strictures, six cases each of penile torsion and meatal stenosis and five cases each of superficial necrosis and poor cosmesis. of these 39 patients, 25 (64%) recovered with conservative treatment and 14 (36%) required re-operation, i.e. ucfs and strictures in four cases each and penile torsion, meatal stenosis and dog-ears in two cases each. all the 12 ucfs were single, pinpointed and were located at the corona in five and at the shaft in seven. eight (67%) of the 12 ucfs healed spontaneously during the follow-up period of 12 weeks.Conclusions: harvesting strifs is technically easy, however, great care is required in their handling, accurate placement and suturing over and around the re-constructed neo-urethras for their secured reinforcement against fistula formation. use of strifs in hypospadias repairs decreases fistula-associated morbidity but does not absolutely prevent fistula formation. the strifs reduce the size and prevent multiplicity of ucfs and locate the ucfs eccentrically well away from the neo-urethra to facilitate their spontaneous (conservative) as well as subsequent (surgical) closure. the mechanism of action of strifs is multi-factorial, like acting as a mechanical barrier; preventing suture line superimposition; inducing neo-angio-genesis; working as biological drain; providing mechanical support; and, filling the dead spaces.

KEY WORDS

Hypospadias - soft tissue reinforcement interposition flaps - urethra - urethro-cutaneous fistulas

• 1 Singh RB, Pavithran NM. Partially de-epithelialized preputial flap (triangular soft tissue flap): An aid to prevent coronal urethrocutaneous fistulae. Pediatr Surg Int 2003; 19: 551-3
• 2 Mathieu P. Treatment in a time of the balanic and juxta-balanic hypospadias. J Chir (Paris) 1932; 39: 481-4
• 3 Snodgrass W. Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 1994; 151: 464-5
• 4 Singh RB, Pavithran NM. Lessons learnt from Snodgrass TIP urethroplasty: A study of 75 cases. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20: 204-6
• 5 Horton Jr CE, Gearhart JP, Jeffs RD. Dermal grafts for the correction of severe chordee associated with hypospadias. J Urol 1993; 150: 452-5
• 6 Nesbit RM. Congenital curvature of the phallus: Report of three cases with description of corrective operation. J Urol 1965; 93: 230-2
• 7 Baskin LS, Erol A, Li YW, Cunha GR. Anatomical studies of hypospadias. J Urol 1998; 160: 1108-15
• 8 Belman AB. The de-epithelialized flap and its influence on hypospadias repair. J Urol 1994; 152: 2332-4
• 9 Smith D. A de-epithelialised overlap flap technique in the repair of hypospadias. Br J Plast Surg 1973; 260: 106-14
• 10 Yerkes EB, Adams MC, Miller DA, Pope 4 th JC, Rink RC, Brock 3 rd JW. Y - to - I wrap: Use of the distal spongiosum for hypospadias repair. J Urol 2000; 163: 1536-9
• 11 Motiwala HG. Dartos flap: An aid to urethral reconstruction. Br J Urol 1993; 72: 260-1
• 12 Churchill BM, van JGSavage, Khoury AE, McLorie GA. The dartos flap as an adjunct in preventing urethrocutaneous fistulas in repeat hypospadias surgery. J Urol 1996; 156: 2047-9
• 13 Snow BW. Use of tunica vaginalis to prevent fistulas in hypospadias surgery. J Urol 1986; 136: 861-3
• 14 Snow BW, Cartwright PC, Unger K. Tunica vaginalis blanket wrap to prevent urethrocutaneous fistula: An 8 year experience. J Urol 1995; 153: 472-3
• 15 Kirkali Z. Tunica vaginalis: An aid in hypospadias surgery. Br J Urol 1990; 65: 530-2
• 16 Singh RB, Pavithran NM. Tunica vaginalis interposition flap in the closure of massive disruption of the neourethral tube (macro urethrocutaneous fistulae). Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20: 464-6
• 17 Byars LT. A technique for consistently satisfactory repair of hypospadias. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1955; 100: 184-90
• 18 Nesbit RM. Plastic procedure for correction of hypospadias. J Urol 1941; 45: 699-702
• 19 Singh RB, Pavithran NM. Elastic-velcro dressing for penis. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20: 389-90