Rigid internal fi xation of zygoma fractures: A comparison of two-point and three-point fi xation

ABSTRACT

Background:Displaced fractures of the zygomatic bone can result in significant functional and aesthetic sequelae. Therefore the treatment must achieve adequate and stable reduction at fracture sites so as to restore the complex multidimensional relationship of the zygoma to the surrounding craniofacial skeleton. Many experimental biophysical studies have compared stability of zygoma after one, two and three-point fixation with mini plates. We conducted a prospective clinical study comparing functional and aesthetic results of two-point and three-point fixation with mini plates in patients with fractures of zygoma.Materials and Methods:Twenty-two patients with isolated zygomatic fractures over a period of one year were randomly assigned into two-point and three-point fixation groups. Results of fixation were analyzed after completion of three months. This included clinical, radiological and photographic evaluation.Results:The three-point fixation group maintained better stability at fracture sites resulting in decreased incidence of dystopia and enophthalmos. This group also had better malar projection and malar height as measured radiologically, when compared with the two-point fixation group.Conclusion:We recommend three-point rigid fixation of fractured zygoma after accurate reduction so as to maintain adequate stabilization against masticatory forces during fracture healing phase.

KEY WORDS

Enophthalmos - fracture zygoma - malar height - malar projection - rigid internal fixation - vertical dystopia

• 3 Davidson J, Nickerson D, Nickerson B. Zygomatic fractures: Comparison of methods of internal fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86: 25-32
• 2 Hoster W.. Experience with functionally stable plate osteosynthesis after forward displacement of upper jaw. J Maxillofac Surg 1980; 8: 176-81
• 3 Schilli W, Ewers R, Niederdellmann H. Bone fixation with screws and plates in maxillofacial region. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 10. 329-35
• 4 Ellis 3 rd E, Kittidumkerng W. Analysis of treatment for isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 386-92
• 5 Zachariades N, Mezitis M, Anagnostopoulos D. Changing trends in treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: A 12-year evaluation of methods used. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 1152-6
• 5 Fonsceca RJ. 1998 56. 1156-7
• 7 Cooter RD, David DJ. Computer based coding of fractures in craniofacial region. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42: 17-26
• 8 Holmes KD, Matthews BL. Three-point alignment of zygoma fractures with miniplate fixation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115: 961-3
• 9 Furst IM, Austin P, Pharaoh M. etal The use of Computed Tomography to define zygomatic complex position. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59: 647-54
• 10 Manson PN, Crawley WA, Yaremchuk MJ. etal Midface fractures: Advantages of immediate extended open reduction and bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76: 1-9
• 11 Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH, Watumull D. Optimizing the management of orbitozygomatic fractures. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19: 149-65
• 12 Rudderman RH, Mullen RL. Biomechanics of facial skeleton. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19: 11-29
• 13 Pearl RM. Treatment of enophthalmos. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19: 99-111
• 14 O'Hara DE, Delvecchio DA, Bartlett SP. etal The role of microfixation in malar fractures: A quantitative biophysical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 345-53