CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2013; 07(01): 110-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699004
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Assessment of changes in color and color parameters of light-cured composite resin after alternative polymerization methods

Emine Sirin Karaarslan
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, TURKIYE
,
Bulbul Mehmet
2   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, TURKIYE
,
Ertas Ertan
3   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, TURKIYE
,
Mehmet Ata Cebe
4   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, M. Kemal University, Hatay, TURKIYE
,
Aslihan Usumez
5   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, TURKIYE
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 October 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective:To examine the amount of change in color and color parameters of a composite resin (Filtek P60) polymerized by five different polymerization methods.

Methods: A Teflon mold (6mm in diameter, 2mm in height) was used to prepare the composite resin discs (n=10). G1: Polymerization with inlay oven; G2: Polymerization with HQTH and autoclave; G3: Polymerization with LED and autoclave; G4: Polymerization with HQTH; G5: Polymerization with LED. Colorimetric values of the specimens before and after polymerization were measured using a spectrophotometer. The CIE L*a*b color system was used for the determination of color difference. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data for significant differences. Tukey’s HSD test and paired two-tailed tests were used to perform multiple comparisons (α=.05).

Results: There were no significant differences in total color change (ΔE*ab) among the polymerization groups (P>.05). However, the lowest color change (ΔE*ab) value was 3.3 in LED and autoclave; the highest color change (ΔE*ab) value was 4.6 in HQTH. For all groups, CIE L*, C*ab and a*values decreased after polymerization (P<.05). The highest Δb* and ΔC*ab values were observed in specimens polymerized in an inlay oven (P<.05).

Conclusion: Composite resin material showed color changes above the clinically accepted value in all study groups (ΔE*ab≥3.3). All specimens became darker during investigation (ΔL*< 0). Specimens polymerized with inlay oven presented the highest Δb* values which means less yellow color in specimens. (Eur J Dent 2013;7:110-116)

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Carlsson GE, Wagner IV, Odman P, Ekstrand K, MacEntee M, Marinello C, Nanami T, Ow RK, Sato H, Speer C, Strub JR, Watanabe T. An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computeraided image manipulation. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:246-254.
  • 2 Davis LG, Ashworth PD, Spriggs LS. Psychological effects of aesthetic dental treatment. J Dent 1998;26:547-254.
  • 3 Taira M, Okazaki M, Takahashi J. Studies on optical properties of two commercial visible-light-cured composite resins by diffuse reflectance measurements. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:329-337.
  • 4 Kim IJ, Lee YK. Changes in color and color parameters of dental resin composites after polymerization. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;80:541-546.
  • 5 Schulze KA, Marshall SJ, Gansky SA, Marshall GW. Color stability and hardness in dental composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater 2003;19:612-619.
  • 6 Seghi RR, Gritz MD, Kim J. Colorimetric changes in composites resulting from visible-light-initiated polymerization. Dent Mater 1990;6:133-137.
  • 7 Knezevic A, Tarle Z, Meniga A, Sutalo J, Pichler G, Ristic M. Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of composite resin samples with blue diodes. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:586-591.
  • 8 Rueggeberg F. Contemporary issues in photocuring. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl 1999;25:4-15.
  • 9 Mobarak E, Elsayad I, Ibrahim M, El-Badrawy W. Effect of LED light-curing on the relative hardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 2009;34:65-71.
  • 10 Ferracane JL. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mater 1985;1:11-14.
  • 11 Rueggeberg FA, Harvey DK, Evans AL. Color changes in post-cure heat-treated resin composites. Am J Dent 1991;4:171-176.
  • 12 Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Properties of a new photo-activated composite polymerized with three different laboratory photo-curing units. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:832-836.
  • 13 Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Properties of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:358-364.
  • 14 Soares CJ, Pizi EC, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Mechanical properties of light-cured composites polymerized with several additional post-curing methods. Oper Dent 2005;30:389-394.
  • 15 Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hammerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 2002;81:578-582.
  • 16 22. Vita Easyshade Operating Manual Date of Issue: 05-05 Bad Sackingen, Germany
  • 17 Culpepper WD. A comparative study of shade-matching procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1970;24:166-173.
  • 18 Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 1996;21:73-80.
  • 19 Celik C, Yuzugullu B, Erkut S, Yamanel K. Effects of mouth rinses on color stability of resin composites. Eur J Dent 2008;2:247-253.
  • 20 Hafez R, Ahmed D, Yousry M, El-Badrawy W, El-Mowafy O. Effect of in-office bleaching on color and surface roughness of composite restoratives. Eur J Dent 2010;4:118-127.
  • 21 Lindsey DT, Wee AG. Perceptibility and acceptability of CIELAB color differences in computer-simulated teeth. J Dent 2007; 35:593-599.
  • 22 Tak O, Altintas SH, Ozturk N, Usumez A. Effect of tree types of light-curing units on 5-year colour changes of lightcured composite. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:29-35.
  • 23 Knispel G. Factors affecting the process of color matching restorative materials to natural teeth. Quintessence Int 1991;22:525-531.
  • 24 Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater 1987;3:246-251.
  • 25 Hosoya Y. Five-year color changes of light-cured resin composites: influence of light-curing times. Dent Mater 1999;15:268-274.
  • 26 Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:33-40
  • 27 Johnston WM, Hesse NS, Davis BK, Seghi RR. Analysis of edge-losses in reflectance measurements of pigmented maxillofacial elastomer. J Dent Res 1996;75:752-760.
  • 28 Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Influence of illuminating and viewing aperture size on the color of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2004;20:116-123.
  • 29 Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Color and opacity variations in three different resin-based composite products after water aging. Dent Mater 2004;20:530-534.
  • 30 Dlugokinski MD, Cauguman FW, Rueggeberg FA. Assessing the effect of extraneous light on photoactivated resin composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:1103-1109.
  • 31 Tyas MJ. Colour stability of composite resins: A clinical comparison. Aust Dent J 1992;37:88-90.
  • 32 Sidhu SK, Ikeda T, Omata Y, Fujita M, Sano H. Change of color and translucency by light curing in resin composites. Oper Dent 2006;31:598-603.
  • 33 Ekfeldt A, Oilo G. Occlusal contact wear of prosthodontic materials. An in vivo study. Acta Odontol Scand 1988;46:159-169.
  • 34 Asmussen E. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res 1982;90:484-489.
  • 35 Ferracane JL, Hopkin JK, Condon JR. Properties of heat-treated composites after aging in water. Dent Mater 1995;11:354-358
  • 36 Bagis YH, Rueggeberg FA. The effect of post-cure heating on residual, unreacted monomer in a commercial resin composite. Dent Mater 2000;16:244-247.
  • 37 da Silva GR, Simamoto-Junior PC, da Mota AS, Soares CJ. Mechanical properties of light-curing composites polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units. Dent Mater J 2007;26:217-223.
  • 38 Terry DA, Leinfelder KF. Development of a Processed Composite Resin Restoration: Preparation and Laboratory Fabrication- Part I. International Dentistry Sa 2006;8:12-20.
  • 39 Shellard E, Duke ES. Indirect composite resin materials for posterior applications. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:1166-1171.
  • 40 Lee YK, Powers JM. Color and optical properties of resinbased composites for bleached teeth after polymerization and accelerated aging. Am J Dent 2001;14:349-354.
  • 41 Marais JT, Dannheimer MF, Germishuys PJ, Borman JW. Depth of cure of light-cured composite resin with light-curing units of different intensity. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1997;52:403-407.