CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Iberoamericana de Cirugía de la Mano 2019; 47(02): 077-083
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698790
Original Article | Artículo Original
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Manejo de la fractura-luxación Interfalángica proximal mediante fijador externo tipo Suzuki. Protocolo de tratamiento y resultados preliminares

Proximal Interphalangeal Fracture-Dislocation Management by External Fixator Type Suzuki. Treatment Protocol and Preliminary Outcomes
Rafael Laredo Rivero
1   Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
2   Unidad de Cirugía de Mano, Hospital Quiron Toledo, Spain
,
Bárbara Maria Pérez Fabra
1   Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
,
Victor Delgado Alcalá
1   Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
,
Roberto Cibantos Martínez
1   Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
,
David Gomez Garrido
3   Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital General de Villalba, Madrid, Spain
,
Javier Cervera Irima
3   Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital General de Villalba, Madrid, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

09 March 2019

21 August 2019

Publication Date:
05 November 2019 (online)

Resumen

Introducción La fractura-luxación de la articulación interfalángica proximal de la mano es frecuente en la práctica clínica, sin embargo, no existe un consenso ni indicaciones definidas para cada tipo de fractura, lo que supone un importante campo de confusión y su tratamiento continúa siendo hoy en día un reto no resuelto. Nos preguntamos si es posible simplificar este algoritmo y utilizar el fijador tipo Suzuki de forma protocolizada para manejar la gran mayoría de lesiones con indicación quirúrgica.

Métodos Se recogieron 15 pacientes con patrones de fractura de tipo 1 (66,6%), tipo 2 (6,6%), tipo 3 (20%) y tipo 5 (6,6%) según la clasificación de Seno entre 2011 y 2019 operados mediante esa técnica y evaluamos sus resultados clínicos y funcionales.

Resultados La media de rango articular metacarpofalángico fue de 97°/-3°, interfalángico proximal de 93°/3° e interfalángico distal de 82°/1°. El EVA medio fue de 2 y el Quick DASH de 13.

Conclusiones Los resultados obtenidos son comparables con el resto de las técnicas quirúrgicas sin aumento de las complicaciones, lo que nos plantea la posibilidad de comenzar un estudio prospectivo con una sola técnica para tratar la mayoría de los patrones de fractura.

Abstract

Introduction Although proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocations are common in clinical practice, there is no consensus in their management nor specific indications for each kind of fracture. We wondered if it was possible to simplify this algorithm and treat the great majority of this injuries with surgical indication with the Suzuki external fixator in a protocolized way.

Methods We collected 15 patients with fracture patterns type 1 (66.6%), type 2 (6.6%), type 3 (20%) and type 5 (6.6%) according to Seno classification between 2011 and 2019 who underwent this procedure and they were evaluated about clinical and functional results.

Results The average range of movement in the injured finger was 97°/ -3° at the metacarpophalangeal joint, 93°/3° at the proximal interphalangeal joint and 82°/1° at the distal interphalangeal joint. The mean VAS value was 2 and the mean Quick DASH score was 13.

Conclusion The results obtained are comparable to the results of other surgical techniques without increasing complications. We consider the possibility of starting a prospective study with this single technique to treat most of these fracture patterns.

 
  • Bibliografía

  • 1 Liodaki E, Xing SG, Mailaender P, Stang F. Management of difficult intra-articular fractures or fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (01) 16-23
  • 2 Haase SC, Chung KC. Current concepts in treatment of fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. PlastReconstr Surg 2014; 134 (06) 1246-1257
  • 3 Ng CY, Oliver CW. Fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (06) 705-712
  • 4 Seno N, Hashizume H, Inoue H, Imatani J, Morito Y. Fractures of the base of the middle phalanx of the finger. Classification, management and long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79 (05) 758-763
  • 5 Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23 (03) 368-380
  • 6 Ellis SJ, Cheng R, Prokopis P. , et al. Treatment of proximal interphalangeal dorsal fracture-dislocation injuries with dynamic external fixation: a pins and rubber band system. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (08) 1242-1250
  • 7 Burnier M, Awada T, Marin Braun F, Rostoucher P, Ninou M, Erhard L. Treatment of unstable proximal interphalangeal joint fractures with hemi-hamate osteochondral autografts. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017; 42 (02) 188-193
  • 8 Eaton RG, Malerich MM. Volar plate arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a review of ten years' experience. J Hand Surg Am 1980; 5 (03) 260-268
  • 9 Cheah AEJ, Tan DMK, Chong AKS, Chew WYC. Volar plating for unstable proximal interphalangeal joint dorsal fracture-dislocations. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (01) 28-33
  • 10 Ikeda M, Kobayashi Y, Saito I, Ishii T, Shimizu A, Oka Y. Open reduction and internal fixation for dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint using a miniplate. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2011; 15 (04) 219-224
  • 11 Federer AE, Guerrero EM, Dekker TJ. , et al. Open Reduction Internal Fixation With Transverse Volar Plating for Unstable Proximal Interphalangeal Fracture-Dislocation: The Seatbelt Procedure. Hand (N Y) 2018; 1558944718790063 ; [Epub ahead of print]
  • 12 Henn CM, Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Dynamic External Fixation for Proximal Interphalangeal Fracture-Dislocations. Oper Tech Orthop 2012; 22 (03) 142-150
  • 13 Damert HG, Altmann S, Kraus A, Infanger M, Sattler D. Treatment of intraarticular middle phalanx fractures using the Ligamentotaxor®. Hand (N Y) 2013; 8 (04) 460-463
  • 14 Kapur B, Paniker J, Casaletto J. An alternative technique for external fixation of traumatic intra-articular fractures of proximal and middle phalanx. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2015; 19 (04) 163-167
  • 15 Sraj S. A Simple Phalangeal External Fixator Using Kirschner Wires and Locking Balls: No Need for Cement or Rubber Bands. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (07) e217-e221 . Doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.04.017
  • 16 Kodama A, Sunagawa T, Nakashima Y. , et al. Joint distraction and early mobilization using a new dynamic external finger fixator for the treatment of fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Orthop Sci 2018; 23 (06) 959-966
  • 17 Lo CH, Nothdurft SH, Park HS, Paul E, Leong J. Distraction ligamentotaxis for complex proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocations: a clinical study and the modified pins rubber band traction system revisited. Burns Trauma 2018; 6: 23
  • 18 Janssen SJ, Molleman J, Guitton TG, Ring D. ; Science Of Variation Group. What middle phalanx base fracture characteristics are most reliable and useful for surgical decision-making?. Clin OrthopRelat Res 2015; 473 (12) 3943-3950
  • 19 Saitta BH, Wolf JM. Treating Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Dislocations. Hand Clin 2018; 34 (02) 139-148
  • 20 Caggiano NM, Harper CM, Rozental TD. Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture Dislocations. Hand Clin 2018; 34 (02) 149-165
  • 21 http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/sites/dash/public/translations/QuickDASH_Spanish_Spain_2018.pdf
  • 22 Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2 (7889): 1127-1131
  • 23 Stern PJ, Roman RJ, Kiefhaber TR, McDonough JJ. Pilon fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16 (05) 844-850
  • 24 MacFarlane RJ, Gillespie S, Cashin F, Mahmood A, Cheung G, Brown DJ. Treatment of fracture subluxations of the proximal interphalangeal joint using a ligamentotaxis device: a multidisciplinary approach. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (08) 825-831
  • 25 Shen XF, Mi JY, Rui YJ. , et al. Delayed treatment of unstable proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocations with a dynamic external fixator. Injury 2015; 46 (10) 1938-1944
  • 26 Suzuki Y, Matsunaga T, Sato S, Yokoi T. The pins and rubbers traction system for treatment of comminuted intraarticular fractures and fracture-dislocations in the hand. J Hand Surg [Br] 1994; 19 (01) 98-107
  • 27 Finsen V. Suzuki's pins and rubber traction for fractures of the base of the middle phalanx. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2010; 44 (4-5): 209-213
  • 28 Ruland RT, Hogan CJ, Cannon DL, Slade JF. Use of dynamic distraction external fixation for unstable fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (01) 19-25
  • 29 Pélissier P, Gobel F, Choughri H, Alet JM. Proximal interphalangeal joint fractures treated with a dynamic external fixator: A multicenter and retrospective study of 88 cases. Chir Main 2015; 34 (05) 245-250
  • 30 Colegate-Stone T, Marenah K, Compson J, Tahmassebi R, Tavakkolizadeh A. Functional Outcomes Following Pilon Fractures of the Middle Phalanx Managed with the Ligamentotaxor External Fixator. Hand Surg 2015; 20 (02) 285-289
  • 31 Abou Elatta MM, Assal F, Basheer HM, El Morshidy AF, Elglaind SM, Abdalla MA. The use of dynamic external fixation in the treatment of dorsal fracture subluxations and pilon fractures of finger proximal interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017; 42 (02) 182-187
  • 32 Agarwal AK, Karri V, Pickford MA. Avoiding pitfalls of the pins and rubbers traction technique for fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58 (05) 489-495