CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 24(02): e211-e214
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698781
Original Research
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Factors Associated with Drain Output in Patients Undergoing to Parotidectomy

1   Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
,
Rahim Dhanani
1   Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
,
Sohail Awan
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
,
Nida Zahid
1   Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
,
Sehrish Nizar Ali Momin
1   Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

28 June 2019

07 September 2019

Publication Date:
28 January 2020 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Tumors of the parotid gland are heterogeneous. The purpose of the drain placement is to evacuate fluid that has a potential to accumulate in the dead space and cause infection after parotidectomy.

Objectives To evaluate the factors associated with drain output among patients submitted to parotidectomy.

Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from January 1994 to December 2014. Patients who underwent parotidectomy were included in the study. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with drain output.

Results A total of 193 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 46.3 years, and 57% of them were male. Length of surgery (β coefficient = 24.2; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 4.94–85.26), type of neck dissection (modified radical neck dissection: β = 93.9; 95% CI: 30.47–157.38; selective neck dissection: β = 79.9; 95%CI: 29.04–126.85), and type of parotidectomy (total β = 45.1; 95%CI: 4.94–85.26) were factors that significantly influenced drain output in patients submitted to parotidectomy with or without neck dissection.

Conclusion Neck dissection, total parotidectomy and length of surgery were predictors of postoperative neck drainage in our cohort. These factors can help predict postoperative neck drain output and help in patient counselling.

 
  • References

  • 1 Chen WC, Chuang HC, Su YY, Chien CY. Predictive factors for post-operative drainage after partial superficial parotidectomy: a case-control study. J Laryngol Otol 2015; 129 (10) 1020-1024
  • 2 Witt RL. The incidence and management of siaolocele after parotidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 140 (06) 871-874
  • 3 Woods RSR, Woods JFC, Duignan ES, Timon C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of wound drains after thyroid surgery. Br J Surg 2014; 101 (05) 446-456
  • 4 Amir I, Morar P, Belloso A. Postoperative drainage in head and neck surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92 (08) 651-654
  • 5 Mofle PJ, Urquhart AC. Superficial parotidectomy and postoperative drainage. Clin Med Res 2008; 6 (02) 68-71
  • 6 Chua DY, Goh CHK. Drainless Parotidectomies versus Conventional Parotidectomies: Randomised Control Study on Efficacy and Safety. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2016; 45 (11) 513-515
  • 7 Holsinger FC, Bui DT. Anatomy, function, and evaluation of the salivary glands. Salivary gland disorders: Springer; 2007: 1-16
  • 8 Ali NS, Nawaz A, Rajput S, Ikram M. Parotidectomy: a review of 112 patients treated at a teaching hospital in Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2010; 11 (04) 1111-1113
  • 9 Sinha UK, Ng M. Surgery of the salivary glands. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999; 32 (05) 887-906
  • 10 Souba WW, Fink MP, Jurkovic GJ. ACS surgery: principles and practice. Decker Intellectual Properties Incorporated; 2007