Mechanical Performance of a Polyaxial Locking Plate and the Influence of Screw Angulation in a Fracture Gap ModelFunding This study was financially supported by the AniCura GmbH—AniCura Research Found. Implants for this study were donated from Aesculap B. Braun Vet Care and DePuy Synthes.
22 December 2018
03 September 2019
18 October 2019 (online)
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the locking compression plate (LCP) with polyaxial locking system (PLS) using single cycle to failure 4-point bending test and to investigate the behaviour of PLS with screws inserted mono- and polyaxially using cyclic fatigue test in two bending directions.
Materials and Methods Tests were performed on bone surrogates in a fracture gap model. The 3.5 LCP and 3.5 PLS plates were tested in single cycle to failure. The 3.5 PLS plates with mono- and polyaxial screws were compared in a cyclic fatigue tests in two orthogonal directions. For both experiments, micro-computed tomography (CT) scans were performed pre- and post-testing to investigate the connections between the screw head and the plate hole. Means of forces and cycles needed to failure were statistically compared.
Results The PLS plates were on average 30% weaker than LCP plates. Mode of failure was plate bending in the single cycle to failure tests, and plate breakage in the cyclic fatigue tests. Neither screw breakage nor loss of the screw–plate interface occurred. Mono- and polyaxial constructs performed similarly when loaded in the same direction. Micro-CT revealed no additional internal cracks in the plates or screws after testing. It also showed for both PLS and LCP that there was only partial contact of the screw head with the plate hole.
Clinical Relevance PLS offers a durable locking system, even when the screws are placed polyaxially. The weaker bending properties of the PLS compared with LCP should be considered during preoperative planning.
Results of this study were presented at the 5th WVOC Conference in Barcelona, Spain, September 2018 and was awarded as the Best Free Communication.
Jakub Kaczmarek and Martin Unger contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. Riccarda Schuenemann, Sandra Bogisch contributed to conception of study, study design and data analysis and interpretation. Tomasz Bartkowiak, Bartosz Gapinski and Piotr Paczos contributed to acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.
- 1 Hak DJ, Banegas R, Ipaktchi K, Mauffrey C. Evolution of plate design and material composition. Injury 2018; 49 (June, Suppl 1): S8-S11
- 2 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B63-B76
- 3 Bel JC. Pitfalls and limits of locking plates. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105 (1S): S103-S109
- 4 Kääb MJ, Frenk A, Schmeling A, Schaser K, Schütz M, Haas NP. Locked internal fixator: sensitivity of screw/plate stability to the correct insertion angle of the screw. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (08) 483-487
- 5 Schoch B, Hast MW, Mehta S, Namdari S. Not all polyaxial locking screw technologies are created equal: a systematic review of the literature. JBJS Rev 2018; 6 (01) e6
- 6 Barnhart MD, Rides CF, Kennedy SC. , et al. Fracture repair using a polyaxial locking plate system (PAX). Vet Surg 2013; 42 (01) 60-66
- 7 Hallbauer J, Klos K, Gräfenstein A. , et al. Does a polyaxial-locking system confer benefits for osteosynthesis of the distal fibula: a cadaver study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 102 (05) 645-649
- 8 Klug A, Gramlich Y, Buckup J, Wincheringer D, Hoffmann R, Schmidt-Horlohé K. Excellent results and low complication rate for anatomic polyaxial locking plates in comminuted proximal ulna fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27 (12) 2198-2206
- 9 Hallbauer J, Gräfenstein A, Rausch S. , et al. Biomechanical analysis of polyaxial locking vs. non-locking plate fixation of unstable fractures of the distal fibula: a cadaver study with a bone only model. Foot Ankle Surg 2018; 24 (04) 326-329
- 10 Al-Mouazzen L, Chou DT, Kyriakopoulos G, Hambidge J. Polyaxial versus uniaxial volar locking plate for distal radial fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2014; 22 (01) 9-12
- 11 Muir P, Johnson KA, Markel MD. Area moment of inertia for comparison of implant cross-sectional geometry and bending stiffness. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8 (03) 146-152
- 12 Blake CA, Boudrieau RJ, Torrance BS. , et al. Single cycle to failure in bending of three standard and five locking plates and plate constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24 (06) 408-417
- 13 American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Specification and Test Method for Metallic Bone Plates, ASTM F382–99 (Reapproved 2003). In: 2003 Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 2003
- 14 Bufkin BW, Barnhart MD, Kazanovicz AJ, Naber SJ, Kennedy SC. The effect of screw angulation and insertion torque on the push-out strength of polyaxial locking screws and the single cycle to failure in bending of polyaxial locking plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26 (03) 186-191
- 15 Malenfant RC, Sod GA. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 string of pearl plate fixation to 3.5 locking compression plate fixation in a canine fracture gap model. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (04) 465-470
- 16 Bilmont A, Palierne S, Verset M, Swider P, Autefage A. Biomechanical comparison of two locking plate constructs under cyclic torsional loading in a fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (05) 323-330
- 17 Bertram JE, Lee DV, Case HN, Todhunter RJ. Comparison of the trotting gaits of Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61 (07) 832-838
- 18 Demner D, Garcia TC, Serdy MG, Hayashi K, Nir BA, Stover SM. Biomechanical comparison of mono- and bicortical screws in an experimentally induced gap fracture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27 (06) 422-429
- 19 Pearson T, Glyde M, Hosgood G, Day R. The effect of intramedullary pin size and monocortical screw configuration on locking compression plate-rod constructs in an in vitro fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (02) 95-103
- 20 Benamou J, Demianiuk RM, Rutherford S. , et al. Effect of bending direction on the mechanical behaviour of 3.5 mm String-of-Pearls and Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (06) 433-440
- 21 Tomlinson AW, Comerford EJ, Birch RS, Innes JF, Walton MB. Mechanical performance in axial compression of a titanium polyaxial locking plate system in a fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (02) 88-94
- 22 Watrous GK, Moens NMM, Runciman J, Gibson TWG. Biomechanical properties of the 1.5 mm locking compression plate: comparison with the 1.5 and 2.0 mm straight plates in compression and torsion. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2018; 31 (06) 438-444
- 23 Rotne R, Bertollo N, Walsh W, Dhand NK, Voss K, Johnson KA. Influence of plate-bone contact on cyclically loaded conically coupled locking plate failure. Injury 2014; 45 (03) 515-521