Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2019; 13(04): 569-573
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698370
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Effects of Different Disinfection Methods on Microleakage of Giomer Restorations

Abidin Talha Mutluay
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey
,
Merve Mutluay
2   Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 November 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effects of different disinfection methods on microleakage of Class V Giomer restorations.

Materials and Methods Class V cavity preparation was performed on 40 sound permanent central incisors. Class V cavities (3 x 2 x 2 mm) were prepared on the buccal surfaces of the selected teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups, each to be disinfected with a different method: Group 1—Disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine, Group 2—Disinfection with 6% sodium hypochlorite, Group 3—Disinfection with erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser, Group 4—Control (distilled water). BeautiBond adhesive and Beautifil II Giomer restoration materials were applied to all surfaces of the cavities after the disinfection of all groups. The teeth were thermocycled 5,000 times (5–55°C), and then were immersed in 0.5% methylene blue for 24 hours. After rinsing, the teeth were longitudinally sectioned and dye penetration was assessed under a stereomicroscope (40x) to evaluate microleakage.

Statistical Analysis The results were statistically evaluated by using the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results Statistically, no significant difference was found between all four groups (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in microleakage scores of study groups (p > 0.05). Also, the microleakage scores of the gingival margins were significantly higher than the incisal margins (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions Application of the different cavity disinfectants has no effect on the microleakage of Class V Giomer restorations.

Keywords

cavity disinfection - chlorhexidine - Giomer - laser - microleakage
 

  • References

  • 1 Türkün M, Türkün LS, Celik EU, Ateş M. Bactericidal effect of Er, Cr: YSGG laser on Streptococcus mutans. Dent Mater J 2006; 25 (01) 81-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Weber K, Hickel R. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations. J Dent 2001; 29 (02) 123-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C, Congiu MD. In vitro evaluation of giomers microleakage after exposure to 33% hydrogen peroxide: self-etch vs total-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2006; 31 (02) 227-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gonzalez EdeH, Yap AU, Hsu SC. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 2004; 29 (05) 578-585
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44 (03) 571-596, vii
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Salama F, Balto H, Al-Yahya F, Al-Mofareh S. The effect of cavity disinfectants on microleakage of composite restorations in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2015; 16 (04) 295-300
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gultz J, Do L, Boylan R, Kaim J, Scherer W. Antimicrobial activity of cavity disinfectants. Gen Dent 1999; 47 (02) 187-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Türkün M, Türkün LS, Kalender A. Effect of cavity disinfectants on the sealing ability of nonrinsing dentin-bonding resins. Quintessence Int 2004; 35 (06) 469-476
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Tulunoglu O, Ayhan H, Olmez A, Bodur H. The effect of cavity disinfectants on microleakage in dentin bonding systems. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22 (04) 299-305
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mutluay AT, Mutluay M. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2015; 25: 258-265
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Pappas M, Burns DR, Moon PC, Coffey JP. Influence of a 3-step tooth disinfection procedure on dentin bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93 (06) 545-550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Obeidi A, Ghasemi A, Azima A, Ansari G. Effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser on microleakage of composite restorations in class V cavities. Photomed Laser Surg 2005; 23 (01) 56-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Brännström M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 1984; 9 (02) 57-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59 (03) 297-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1998; 43 (04) 305-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Eronat N, Yilmaz E, Kara N, Topaloglu AA. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2014; 8 (04) 450-455
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27 (02) 89-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz UB. Effect of cavity design on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. Am J Dent 1997; 10 (01) 32-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995; 74 (05) 1168-1178
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Märkl A. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without “softstart-polymerization”. Oper Dent 2000; 25 (01) 26-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Yazici AR, Celik C, Dayangac B, Ozgunaltay G. Effects of different light curing units/modes on the microleakage of flowable composite resins. Eur J Dent 2008; 2 (04) 240-246
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lee BS, Lin YW, Chia JS. et al. Bactericidal effects of diode laser on Streptococcus mutans after irradiation through different thickness of dentin. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38 (01) 62-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kouchi Y, Ninomiya J, Yasuda H, Fukui K, Moriyama T, Okamoto H. Location of Streptococcus mutans in the dentinal tubules of open infected root canals. J Dent Res 1980; 59 (12) 2038-2046
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Schmalz G, Ergücü Z, Hiller KA. Effect of dentin on the antibacterial activity of dentin bonding agents. J Endod 2004; 30 (05) 352-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kucukesmen HC, Kucukesmen C. Comparison of microleakage levels of class-V hybrid composite resin restorations. Balikesir Health Sci J 2012; 1: 110-116
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 1996; 27 (09) 619-625
    PubMedGoogle Scholar