PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2020; 55(01): 106-111
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697968
Artigo Original
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Functional results in rotator cuff arthropathy[*]

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
Alexandre T. Nascimento 
1   Grupo de Ombro e Cotovelo, Hospital Orthoservice, São José dos Campos, SP, Brasil
,
Gustavo K. Claudio
1   Grupo de Ombro e Cotovelo, Hospital Orthoservice, São José dos Campos, SP, Brasil
,
Pedro B. Rocha
1   Grupo de Ombro e Cotovelo, Hospital Orthoservice, São José dos Campos, SP, Brasil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

20. März 2018

14. August 2018

Publikationsdatum:
13. Dezember 2019 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the functional results of patients submitted to reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy refractory to conservative treatment.

Methods A retrospective study of 20 patients (21 shoulders), 17 women (81%) and 3 men (19%), underwent a reverse shoulder arthroplasty between October 2012 and September 2017, for a rotator cuff arthropathy treatment, operated by a single surgeon in a single center. The patients were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, the Short-Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36), the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain rating, and the University of California – Los Angeles (UCLA) score. The mean age at surgery was of 66 years old (range: 55 to 83 years old). The duration of symptoms before surgery was of ∼ 2.5 years (range: 12 months to 6 years). The mean follow-up was of 42.4 months (range: 19 to 56.7 months).

Results The mean postoperative scores were 18.2 points in DASH; 2 points in EVA, of which 16 (77%) corresponded to mild pain, 4 (18%) to moderate pain, and 1 (5%) to severe pain; 29 points in UCLA, of which 6 patients presented a regular result (28%), 10 patients a good result (48%), and 5 patients an excellent result (24%); and 63 points in the SF-36. The complications were four cases of notching, one case of acromial fracture due to stress, and one case of postoperative infection.

Conclusions Reverse arthroplasty of the shoulder presents good functional results in the evaluated scores, providing a significant improvement in the quality of life of the patients.

Keywords

arthroplasty, replacement, shoulder - rotator cuff arthropathy - shoulder arthrosis - rotator cuff tear - shoulder/surgery

* Work performed at Hospital Orthoservice, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.


 

  • Referências

  • 1 Ecklund KJ, Lee TQ, Tibone J, Gupta R. Rotator cuff tear arthropathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15 (06) 340-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Favaro RC, Abdulahad M, Filho SM, Valerio R, Superti MJ. Artropatia de manguito: o que esperar do resultado funcional da artroplastia reversa?. Rev Bras Ortop 2015; 50 (05) 523-529
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Neer II CS, Craig EV, Fukuda H. Cuff-tear arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65 (09) 1232-1244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gerber C, Pennington SD, Nyffeler RW. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17 (05) 284-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zeman CA, Arcand MA, Cantrell JS, Skedros JG, Burkhead Jr WZ. The rotator cuff-deficient arthritic shoulder: diagnosis and surgical management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1998; 6 (06) 337-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Matsen 3rd FA, Boileau P, Walch G, Gerber C, Bicknell RT. The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (03) 660-667
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ferreira Neto AA, Malavolta EA, Assunção JH, Trindade EM, Gracitelli ME. Artroplastia reversa do ombro: avaliação dos resultados clínicos e da qualidade de vida. Rev Bras Ortop 2017; 52 (03) 298-302
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Schwitzguébel AJ, Haas C, Lädermann A. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Rev Med Suisse 2016; 12 (504) 266 , 268–269
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Amaral MVG, Faria JLR, Siqueira G, Cohen M, Brandão B, Moraes R, Monteiro M, Motta G. Artroplastia reversa do ombro no tratamento da artropatia do manguito rotador. Rev Bras Ortop 2014; 49 (03) 279-285
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Gerber C, Canonica S, Catanzaro S, Ernstbrunner L. Longitudinal observational study of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction: results after 15 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27 (05) 831-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Smithers CJ, Young AA, Walch G. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2011; 4 (04) 183-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nerot C, Ohl X. Primary shoulder reverse arthroplasty: surgical technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014; 100 (1, Suppl): S181-S190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Seebauer L. Total reverse shoulder arthroplasty: European lessons and future trends. Am J Orthop 2007; 36 (12) (Suppl. 01) 22-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Petrillo S, Longo UG, Papalia R, Denaro V. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 2017; 101 (02) 105-112
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I. Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15 (05) 527-540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Crosby LA, Hamilton A, Twiss T. Scapula fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: classification and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (09) 2544-2549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P. Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20 (01) 146-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar