CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2009; 03(01): 03-09
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697399
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Cytotoxicity of Dental Adhesives In Vitro

Elisabeth A. Koulaouzidou
a   Lecturer, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Maria Helvatjoglu-Antoniades
b   Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
,
George Palaghias
b   Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Artemis Karanika-Kouma
b   Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Dimitrios Antoniades
c   Professor, Department of Oral Medicine/ Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of six dental adhesives (Admira Bond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Fuji Bond LC, Gluma Comfort Bond, and NanoBond) applied to cell cultures.

Methods: The experiments were performed on two cell lines, rat pulp cells (RPC-C2A) and human lung fibroblasts (MRC5). Samples of the adhesives were light-cured and placed in culture medium for 24 hours. The extraction media was applied on the RPC-C2A and the MRC5 cells. Complete medium was used as a control. Cytotoxicity was evaluated with a modified sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay after 24 hours of exposure.

Results: The cell survival of RPC-C2A cells exposed to Fuji Bond LC, NanoBond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Admira Bond and Gluma Comfort Bond was 73%, 67%, 50%, 20%, 18% and 5% respectively, relative to the cell survival with the control medium. In the MRC5 cell line, the relative survival was 98%, 80%, 72%, 41%, 19% and 7% after exposure to NanoBond, Fuji Bond LC, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Admira Bond and Gluma Comfort Bond, respectively.

Conclusions: Different types of dental adhesives showed different cytotoxic effects on cells in vitro. The self-etch adhesives were superior in terms of cytotoxicity. The different cytotoxic effects of dental adhesives should be considered when selecting an appropriate adhesive for operative restorations. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:3-9)

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Hanks CT, Wataha JC, Parsed RR, Strawn SE. Delineation of cytotoxic concentrations of two dentin bonding agents in vitro. J Endod 1992; 18: 589-596
  • 2 Hanks CT, Strawn SE, Wataha JC, Craig RG. Cytotoxic effects of resin components on cultured mammalian fibroblasts. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 1450-1455
  • 3 Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20
  • 4 Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM. Structural evidence of a sealed tissue interface with a total-etch wet-bonding technique in vivo. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 629-636
  • 5 Cox CF, Hafez AA, Akimoto N, Otsuki M, Suzuki S, Tarim B. Biocompatibility of primer, adhesive and resin composite systems on non-exposed and exposed pulps of non-human primate teeth. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 55-63
  • 6 BouiLLaguet S, Bertossa B, Krejci I, Wataha JC, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Alternative adhesive strategies to optimize bonding to radicular dentin. J Endod 2007; 33: 1227-1230
  • 7 BouiLLaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 199-205
  • 8 Vajrabhaya L, Pasasuk A, Harnirattisai C. Cytotoxicity evaluation of single component dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 440-444
  • 9 Chen RS, Liu CC, Tseng WY, Jeng JH, Lin CP. Cytotoxicity of three dentin bonding agents on human dental pulp cells. J Dent 2003; 31: 223-229
  • 10 Koulaouzidou EA, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Antoniades D. Cytotoxicity evaluation of an antibacterial dentin adhesive system on established cell lines. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 84: 271-276
  • 11 Meryon SD, Brook AM. In vitro cytotoxicity of three dentin bonding agents. J Dent 1989; 17: 279-283
  • 12 Szep S, Kunkel A, Ronge K, Heidemann D. Cytotoxicity of modern adhesives-In vitro testing on gingival fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 63: 53-60
  • 13 Thumwanit V, Kedjarune U. Cytotoxicity of polymerized commercial cyanoacrylate adhesive on cultured human oral fibroblasts. Aust Dent J 1999; 44: 248-252
  • 14 Papazisis KT, Geromichalos GD, Dimitriadis KA, Kortsaris AH. Optimization of the sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay. J Immunol Methods 1997; 208: 151-158
  • 15 Vajrabhaya L, Sithisarn P, Wilairat P, Leelaphiwat S. Comparison between Sulphorhodamine-B dye staining and 51Cr-release method in cytotoxicity assay of endodontic sealers. J Endod 1997; 23: 355-357
  • 16 Skehan P. Assays of cell growth and cytotoxicity. In Studzinski GP. (ed) Cell growth and apoptosis: A practical approach. Oxford: IRL press; 1995: 169-191
  • 17 Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an infilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1652-1658
  • 18 Spahl W, Budzikiewicz H, Geurtsen W. Determination of leachable components from four commercial dental composites by gas and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Dent Res 1998; 26: 137-145
  • 19 Mates JM, Sanchez-Jimenez FM. Role of reactive species in apoptosis: implications for cancer therapy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2000; 32: 157-170
  • 20 Engelmann J, Leyhausen G, Leibfritz D, Geurtsen W. Effect of TEGDMA on the intracellular glutathione concentration of human gingival fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 63: 746-751
  • 21 Mohsen NM, Craig RG, Hanks CT. Cytotoxicity of urethane dimethacrylate composites before and after aging and leaching. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 39: 252-260
  • 22 Ratanasathien S, Wataha JC, Hanks CT, Dennison JB. Cytotoxic interactive effects of dentin bonding components on mouse fibroblasts. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1602-1606
  • 23 Al-Hiyasat AS, Darmani H, Milhem MM. Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental resin composites and their flowable derivatives. Clin Oral Investig 2005; 9: 21-25
  • 24 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002; 30: 371-382
  • 25 De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132
  • 26 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore Memorial Lecture Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235
  • 27 Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayami Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 454-458
  • 28 Lan WH, Lan WC, Wang TM, Lee YL, Tseng WY, Lin CP, Chang MC, Jeng JH. Cytotoxicity of conventional and modified glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 251-259
  • 29 Oliva A, Della Ragione F, Salerno A, Riccio V, Tartaro G, Cozzolino A, D’Amato S, Pontoni G, Zappia V. Biocompatibility studies on glass ionomer cements by primary cultures of human osteoblasts. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1351-1356