Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2008; 02(01): 48-58
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697354
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Microleakage of Class-V Composite Restorations with Different Bonding Systems on Fluorosed Teeth

Çiḡdem Küçükeşmen
a   Assist. Prof., Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
,
Hayriye Sönmez
b   Prof., Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 September 2019 (online)

  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To examine the effects of dental fluorosis and total and self-etch bonding systems on microleakage of Class-V composite restorations in permanent molar teeth.

Methods: Teeth were classified as three main groups according to Thylstrup-Fejerskov Index (TFI) as TFI=0, TFI=1-3 and TFI=4. Total and self-etching/bonding procedures were determined for each main group. Total-etching procedures were acid-etching for 30s and acid-etching for 60s with Single Bond/total-etch bonding system. Self-etching procedure was applied with Prompt-L-Pop/self-etch bonding system. 63 box-shaped Class-V cavities (4×2×2 mm) were prepared on mid-buccal/palatinal/lingual surfaces of teeth for totalling nine test groups (n=7). Restorations with composite material (Charisma) polymerized with halogen unit for 40s. Teeth were thermocycled between +5°C - +55°C (×500), immersed in 0.5% basic-fuchsin solution (37°C, 24h) and separated longitudinally in bucco-lingual direction. Dye penetration was examined under stereomicroscope (3.2×10).

Results: Microleakage levels were higher in teeth of TFI=4 than TFI=0 occlusally or cervically (P<.05). In TFI=0; total-etched teeth for 30s have statistically shown more leakage than total-etched teeth for 60s occlusally or cervically (P<.05). In TFI=4; microleakage levels were significantly higher for 30s than 60s cervically (P<.05). For all TFI levels, microleakage was commonly increased with self-etch system than total-etch system (P<.05). Generally, higher leakage was present at cervical margins than occlusal margins (P<.05).

Conclusions: Microleakage has increased by severity of dental fluorosis. Generally, more leakage was observed in total-etched teeth for 30s than 60s. Microleakage was commonly higher in self-etched teeth than total-etched teeth. More leakage was present at cervical margins than occlusal margins. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:48-58)

Key words:

Class-V restorations - Composites - Dental fluorosis - Microleakage
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Bryant BS, Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denys FR. The effect of topical fluoride treatment on enamel fluoride uptake and the tensile bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 294-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Whitford GM, Ekstrand J. Summary of Session I: Metabolism of fluoride. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 513
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Hallgren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S. Salivary fluoride concentrations in children with glass ionomer cemented orthodontic appliances. Caries Res 1990; 24: 239-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Croll TP. Light-hardened glass-ionomer-resin cement restoration adjacent to a bonded orthodontic bracket: A case report. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 65-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pang DTV, Phillips CL, Bawden JW. Fluoride intake from beverage consumption in a sample of North Carolina children. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1382
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Al-Sugair MH, Akpata ES. Effect of fluorosis on etching of human enamel. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 521-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Leverett D. Prevalence of dental fluorosis in fluoridated and nonfluoridated communities-a preliminary investigation. J Public Health Dent 1986; 46: 184-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Awliya WY, Akpata ES. Effect of fluorosis on shear bond strength of glass ionomer-based restorative materials to dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 290-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ateyah N, Akpata E. Factors affecting shear bond strength of composite resin to fluorosed human enamel. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 216-222
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dean HT, Arnold FA, Evolve E. Domestic water and dental caries. V. Additional studies of the relation of fluoride in domestic waters to dental caries in 4.425 white children, aged 12-14 years of 13 cities in 4 states. Public Health Report 1942; 57: 1155-1179
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Akpata ES, Fakiha Z, Khan N. Dental fluorosis in 12-15-year-old rural children exposed to fluorides from well drinking water in the Hail region of Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25: 324-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-883
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Opinya GN, Pameijer CH. Tensile bond srtength of fluorosed Kenyan teeth using the acid etch technique. Int Dent J 1986; 36: 225-229
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wieczkowski Jr G, Yu XY, Davis EL, Joynt RB. Microleakage in various dentin bonding agent/composite resin systems. Oper Dent 1992; (Suppl.) 5: 62-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Retief DH, Denys FR. Adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1989; 2: 133-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Barkmeier WW, Cooley RL. Laboratory evaluation of adhesive systems. Oper Dent 1992; (Suppl.) 5: 50-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 512-519
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hembree JH, Andrews JT. In vitro microleakage of several acid-etch composite systems. J Dent Res 1976 55. Special issue B. Abstract No:309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin CH, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001; 29: 55-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 97-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001; (Suppl.) 6: 119-144
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis in permanent teeth in relation to histologic changes. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978; 6: 315-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fejerskov O, Larsen MJ, Richards A, Baelum V. Dental tissue effects of fluoride. Adv Dent Res 1994; 8: 15-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Alavi AA, Kianimanesh N. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 19-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992; 20: 3-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Charlton DG, Moore BK. In vitro evaluation of two microleakage detection tests. J Dent 1992; 20: 55-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bayne SC, Hermann HO, Edward J. Update on dental composite restorations. JADA 1994; 125: 687-701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Puckett A, Fitchie J, Hembree Jr J, Smith J. The effect of incremental versus bulk fill techniques on the microleakage of composite resin using a glass-ionomer liner. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 186-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Overhang of class V composite resin restorations from hygroscopic expansion. Quintessence Int 1989; 20: 551-553
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Markl A. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations with and without “softstart polymerization”. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 26-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Attar N, Korkmaz Y. Effect of two-light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 80-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Nalcaci A, Ulusoy N. Effect of thermocycling on microleakage of resin composites polymerized with LED curing techniques. OuintessenceInt 2007; 38: 433-439
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Küçükeçmen Ç, Sönmez H, Üçümez A, Küçükeçmen HC. Effects of dental fluorosis on microleakage from Class-V ormocer restorations in permanent molar teeth. Fluoride 2007; 40: 134-139
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Weber K, Hickel R. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations. J Dent 2001; 29: 123-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Davidson CL. Sealing ability of two “compomers” applied with and without phosphoric acid treatment for Class V restorations in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 131-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LA. Rodrigues. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 31-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Owens BM, Johnson WW, Harris EF. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 60-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C, Congiu MD. In vitro evaluation of giomers microleakage after exposure to 33% hydrogen peroxide: self-etch vs total-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 227-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 179-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Aranha AC, Pimenta LA. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 99-103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Pontes DG, Tavares De, Melo A, Monnerat AF. Microleakage of new all-in-one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 136-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Heping LI, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 111-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of asidic primers in microleakage of class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 244-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Corona S, Borsatto Mc, Palma Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A, Pecora JD. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 491-497
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Reis AF, Arrais CAG, Novaes PD, Carvalho RM, De Goes MF, Giannini M. Ultramorphological analysis of resin-dentin interfaces produced with water-based single-step and two-step adhesives: nanoleakage expression. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2004; 71B: 90-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Suppa P, Breschi L, Ruggeri A, Mazzotti G, Prati C, Chersoni S, Di Lenarda R, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Nanoleakage within the hybrid layer: A correlative FEISEM/TEM investigation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2005; 73B: 7-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Yuan Y, Shimada Y, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Qualitative analysis of adhesive interface nanoleakage using FE-SEM/ EDS. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 561-569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Reis AF, Giannini M, Pereira PN. Long-term TEM analysis of the nanoleakage patterns in resin-dentin interfaces produced by different bonding strategies. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1164-1172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Watson TF. Applications of confocal scanning optical microscopy to dentistry. Br Dent J 1991; 9 (171) 287-291
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Watson TF, Boyde A. Confocal light microscopic techniques for examining dental operative procedures and dental materials A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 193-200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Watson TF, Azzopardi A, Etman M, Cheng PC, Sidhu SK. Confocal and multi-photon microscopy of dental hard tissues and biomaterials. Am J Dent 2000; 13 (Spec No) 19D-24D
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Watson TF. Applications of high-speed confocal imaging techniques in operative dentistry. Scanning 1994; 16: 168-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Zyskind D, Frenkel A, Fuks A, Hirschfeld Z. Marginal leakage around V-shaped cavities restored with glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 41-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Araujo Fde O, Vieira LC, Monteiro Junior S. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 556-561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 DeLiperi S, Bardwell DN, Papathanasiou A, KastaLi S, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of a microhybrid composite resin using three different adhesive placement techniques. J Adhes Dent 2004; 6: 135-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Brandt PD, de Wet FA, du Preez IC. Self-etching bonding systems: In-vitro micro-leakage evaluation. SADJ 2006; 61: 248,250-251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Owens BM, Johnson WW, Harris EF. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 60-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Bedran de Castro AK, Pimenta LA, Amaral CM, Ambrosano GM. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002; 14: 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 303-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Hannig M, Fu B. Effect of air-abrasion and resin composite on microleakage of Class V restorations bonded with selfetching primers. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 265-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Wieczkowski Jr G, Joynt RB, Klockowski R, Davis EL. Effects of incremental versus bulk fill technique on resistance to cuspal fracture of teeth restored with posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60: 283-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Luo Y, Lo ECM, Wei SHY, Tay FR. Comparison of pulse activation vs conventional light-curing on marginal adaptation of a compomer conditioned using a total-etch or a self-etch technique. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 36-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-1639
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. The effect of light-curing modes on the microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. J Dent 2004; 32: 247-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ. The effect of acid etching on enamel, dentin and the inner surface of the resin restoration. A SEM investigation. J Dent Res 1977; 56: 917-923
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ, Malmgren O. The effect of various pretreatment methods of the enamel in bonding procedures. Am J Orthod 1978; 74: 522-530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Christensen GJ. Clinical factors affecting adhesion. Oper Dent 1992; (Suppl.) 5: 24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Kirzioḡlu Z, Özay Ertürk M, Karayilmaz H, Orhan H. Effects of dental fluorosis and salivary contamination on microleakage of four different restorative materials in primary molars. Fluoride 2006; 39: 220-227
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Salim S, Santini A, Husham A. A in-vitro study of microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with a selfetching material versus a conventional two-bottle system. Prim Dent Care 2006; 13: 107-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Gillet D, Nancy J, Dupuis V, Dorignac G. Microleakage and penetration depth of three types of materials in fissure sealant. Self-etching primer vs etching: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002; 26: 175-178
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, Milia E. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 257-261
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Ozturk AN, Usumez A, Ozturk B, Usumez S. Influence of different light sources on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 500-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Bausch JR, De Lange K, Davidson CL, Peters A, De Gee AJ. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 59-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Kinomoto Y, Torii M. Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stresses in resin composite restorations. J Dent 1998; 26: 165-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar