J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82(02): 189-195
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696683
Original Article

Compartmentalization: An Open Technique for Frontal Sinus Repair and Preservation—Description of Technique and Early Case Series

Christopher Miller
1   Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
,
Luke Weisbrod
1   Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
,
David Beahm
2   Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
,
Roukoz Chamoun
1   Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding Sources None.

Abstract

Background Cranialization or obliteration is widely accepted intervention for traumatic or intentional breach of the frontal sinus. These techniques, however, result in the loss of frontal sinus function and have a persistent risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and mucocele. Compartmentalization is an open technique for repair of the frontal sinus using allograft onlay and a vascularized periosteal flap that allows for preservation of frontal sinus function.

Objective The main objective of this article is to describe the technique for compartmentalization of the frontal sinus and demonstrate its efficacy and complication rate with an early patient series.

Methods Our technique includes the following key components: harvesting of a pedicled periosteal flap, frontal sinus repair through a bifrontal craniotomy with minimal mucosa removal, ensuring the patency of the nasal frontal outflow tract, and separation of the brain from the frontal sinus with a dual layer of periosteum and allograft.

All cases of frontal sinus repair using the compartmentalization technique at our institution were reviewed. Charts were reviewed for CSF leak, mucocele, and other complications.

Results Twenty-three patients underwent the described frontal sinus repair technique 17 for tumor and 6 for trauma. There were no CSF leaks and no mucoceles. One patient experienced postoperative anemia and a “parameningeal reaction” that were managed with a short course of antibiotics.

Conclusions Compartmentalization, due to its sinus preservation and low complication rate, represents a meaningful step forward in neurosurgical technique for open frontal sinus repair. However, long-term outcomes are necessary to fully evaluate risk of mucocele.

Note

Prior presentations: Poster, North American Skull Base Society Meeting, Coronado, CA 2018. Poster, Resident and Post-Doc Research Forum. Kansas City, Kansas, Kansas University Medical Center, 2018.


Industry affiliations: None. In particular, no author has any financial interest in Aesculap, the manufacturer of Lyoplant mentioned in the manuscript.


Grants

None.




Publication History

Received: 16 February 2019

Accepted: 28 July 2019

Article published online:
12 September 2019

© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Corina L, Scarano E, Parrilla C, Almadori G, Paludetti G. Use of titanium mesh in comminuted fractures of frontal sinus anterior wall. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2003; 23 (01) 21-25
  • 2 Lawson W, Reino A, Deeb R. The Riedel procedure—an analysis of 22 cases. Archives of Otolaryngology and Rhinology. 2017; 3 (03) 87-92
  • 3 Raghavan U, Jones NS. The place of Riedel's procedure in contemporary sinus surgery. J Laryngol Otol 2004; 118 (09) 700-705
  • 4 Lakhani RS, Shibuya TY, Mathog RH, Marks SC, Burgio DL, Yoo GH. Titanium mesh repair of the severely comminuted frontal sinus fracture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127 (06) 665-669
  • 5 Rodriguez ED, Stanwix MG, Nam AJ. et al. Twenty-six-year experience treating frontal sinus fractures: a novel algorithm based on anatomical fracture pattern and failure of conventional techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (06) 1850-1866
  • 6 Bell RB, Dierks EJ, Brar P, Potter JK, Potter BE. A protocol for the management of frontal sinus fractures emphasizing sinus preservation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 (05) 825-839
  • 7 Freeman JL, Winston KR. Breach of posterior wall of frontal sinus: management with preservation of the sinus. World Neurosurg 2015; 83 (06) 1080-1089
  • 8 Nadell J, Kline DG. Primary reconstruction of depressed frontal skull fractures including those involving the sinus, orbit, and cribriform plate. J Neurosurg 1974; 41 (02) 200-207
  • 9 Donald PJ, Bernstein L. Compound frontal sinus injuries with intracranial penetration. Laryngoscope 1978; 88 (2 Pt 1): 225-232
  • 10 JH B. The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus, Volume 1: Hieroglyphic Transliteration, Translation, and Commentary. Vol I; Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute Publications; 1930
  • 11 Sanchez GM, Burridge AL. Decision making in head injury management in the Edwin Smith Papyrus. Neurosurg Focus 2007; 23 (01) E5
  • 12 Ramadan HH. History of frontal sinus surgery. In: The frontal sinus. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2005: 1-6
  • 13 Gossman DG, Archer SM, Arosarena O. Management of frontal sinus fractures: a review of 96 cases. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (08) 1357-1362
  • 14 Donald PJ. Frontal sinus ablation by cranialization. Report of 21 cases. Arch Otolaryngol 1982; 108 (03) 142-146
  • 15 Castro B, Walcott BP, Redjal N, Coumans JV, Nahed BV. Cerebrospinal fluid fistula prevention and treatment following frontal sinus fractures: a review of initial management and outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 32 (06) E1
  • 16 Choi M, Li Y, Shapiro SA, Havlik RJ, Flores RL. A 10-year review of frontal sinus fractures: clinical outcomes of conservative management of posterior table fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (02) 399-406
  • 17 Gerbino G, Roccia F, Benech A, Caldarelli C. Analysis of 158 frontal sinus fractures: current surgical management and complications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2000; 28 (03) 133-139
  • 18 Wallis A, Donald PJ. Frontal sinus fractures: a review of 72 cases. Laryngoscope 1988; 98 (6 Pt 1): 593-598
  • 19 El Khatib K, Danino A, Malka G. The frontal sinus: a culprit or a victim? A review of 40 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004; 32 (05) 314-317
  • 20 Bell RB. Management of frontal sinus fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2009; 21 (02) 227-242
  • 21 Xie C, Mehendale N, Barrett D, Bui CJ, Metzinger SE. 30-year retrospective review of frontal sinus fractures: The Charity Hospital experience. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 2000; 6 (01) 7-15 , discussion 16–18
  • 22 Chen DJ, Chen CT, Chen YR, Feng GM. Endoscopically assisted repair of frontal sinus fracture. J Trauma 2003; 55 (02) 378-382
  • 23 Woodworth BA, Schlosser RJ, Palmer JN. Endoscopic repair of frontal sinus cerebrospinal fluid leaks. J Laryngol Otol 2005; 119 (09) 709-713
  • 24 Steiger JD, Chiu AG, Francis DO, Palmer JN. Endoscopic-assisted reduction of anterior table frontal sinus fractures. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1936-1939
  • 25 Chaaban MR, Conger B, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Transnasal endoscopic repair of posterior table fractures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147 (06) 1142-1147
  • 26 Grayson JW, Jeyarajan H, Illing EA, Cho DY, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Changing the surgical dogma in frontal sinus trauma: transnasal endoscopic repair. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2017; 7 (05) 441-449
  • 27 Tedaldi M, Ramieri V, Foresta E, Cascone P, Iannetti G. Experience in the management of frontal sinus fractures. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (01) 208-210
  • 28 Parhiscar A, Har-El G. Frontal sinus obliteration with the pericranial flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124 (03) 304-307
  • 29 Calderon W, Chang N, Mathes SJ. Comparison of the effect of bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (05) 785-794