Impact of Preclinical Labor and Delivery Shadowing on Student Perceptions of Obstetrics and Gynecology as a Specialty and Possible Career: A Prospective Cohort

Sarah K. Dotters-Katz; Marcela C. Smid; Sara Tinkham; Alice Chuang

doi:10.1055/s-0039-1695747

American Journal of Perinatology Reports, Inhaltsverzeichnis

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · AJP Rep 2019; 09(04): e361-e365
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695747

Original Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Impact of Preclinical Labor and Delivery Shadowing on Student Perceptions of Obstetrics and Gynecology as a Specialty and Possible Career: A Prospective Cohort

Sarah K. Dotters-Katz

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

,

Marcela C. Smid

²Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

,

Sara Tinkham

³Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

,

Alice Chuang

³Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of preclinical shadowing on student interest and perceptions of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN).

Methods We enrolled a prospective cohort of preclinical medical students who shadowed on labor and delivery (L&D). Students sent electronic surveys a week prior (presurvey), the week after (postsurvey), and three months after shadowing (far-survey). Responses compared using descriptive statistics. We analyzed common themes of free text responses.

Results From July 2016 to April 2017, 41 students shadowed on L&D; 81% were female. Eighty percent responded to at least one survey, 37% completed all surveys, (presurvey: 76%, postsurvey: 51%, and far-survey: 46%). Prior to shadowing, 10% (3/31) planed a career in OBGYN compared with 24% (5/21) after shadowing (p = 0.42). Over 50% of students described the people and procedures as altering their perceptions of OBGYN in a positive way. Common themes explaining this change included: culture (n = 4), team interactions (n = 4), seeing deliveries (n = 3), and hands-on experiences (n = 3). Three months after shadowing, 79% described the experience as very worthwhile. Eighty-nine percent would recommend the experience to a friend not interested in OBGYN and 100% stated they would shadow again.

Discussion Although shadowing may not increase students' desire to pursue OBGYN, it is nearly universally felt to be worthwhile and improves perceptions of the field.

Keywords

labor and delivery - shadowing - preclinical exposure - medical students - perceptions - obstetrics - culture

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Gharahbaghian L, Hindiyeh R, Langdorf MI. , et al. The effect of emergency department observational experience on medical student interest in emergency medicine. J Emerg Med 2011; 40 (04) 458-462
2 Penciner R. Emergency medicine preclerkship observerships: evaluation of a structured experience. CJEM 2009; 11 (03) 235-239
3 Foote DC, Meza JM, Sood V, Reddy RM. Assessment of female medical students' interest in careers in cardiothoracic surgery. J Surg Educ 2017; 74 (05) 811-819
4 Antiel RM, Thompson SM, Camp CL, Thompson GB, Farley DR. Attracting students to surgical careers: preclinical surgical experience. J Surg Educ 2012; 69 (03) 301-305
5 Cloyd J, Holtzman D, O'Sullivan P, Sammann A, Tendick F, Ascher N. Operating room assist: surgical mentorship and operating room experience for preclerkship medical students. J Surg Educ 2008; 65 (04) 275-282
6 Drolet BC, Sangisetty S, Mulvaney PM, Ryder BA, Cioffi WG. A mentorship-based preclinical elective increases exposure, confidence, and interest in surgery. Am J Surg 2014; 207 (02) 179-186
7 Dotters-Katz S, Panzer A, Givens M, Smid M, Chuang A. Preclinical labor-and-delivery shadowing: the impact on medical students' perceptions of obstetrics and gynecology. AJP Rep 2018; 8 (02) e64-e67
8 Bienstock JL, Laube DW. The recruitment phoenix: strategies for attracting medical students into obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (5, Pt. 1): 1125-1127
9 Wei McIntosh E, Morley CP. Family medicine or primary care residency selection: effects of family medicine interest groups, MD/MPH dual degrees, and rural medical education. Fam Med 2016; 48 (05) 385-388
10 Hinchey S, LaRochelle J, Maurer D, Shimeall WT, Durning SJ, DeZee KJ. Association between interest group participation and choice of residency. Fam Med 2011; 43 (09) 648-652
11 Blau EM, Aird P, Dolovich L, Burns S, del Pilar-Chacon M. Rural medicine interest groups at McMaster University: a pilot study. Can J Rural Med 2009; 14 (04) 139-144
12 Hammoud MM, Stansfield RB, Katz NT, Dugoff L, McCarthy J, White CB. The effect of the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship on students' interest in a career in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195 (05) 1422-1426
13 Quirk SK, Riemer C, Beers PJ. , et al. Dermatology interest groups in medical schools. Dermatol Online J 2016; 22 (07) 13030/qt1zm883qs