Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694057
A Last-Ditch Effort and Personalized Surgeon Letter Improves PROMs Follow-Up Rate in Sports Medicine Patients: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial
Funding The research reported in this publication was partially supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AR053684 (KPS) and under award number K23AR066133, which supported a portion of M .H. J.'s professional effort.
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are important for the advancement of orthopaedic surgeries. The primary difficulty while collecting PROMs is obtaining adequate follow-up rates. Therefore, it is important to find methods to improve follow-up, especially in patients who have failed to respond to initial attempts. We hypothesized that PROMs follow-up could be effectively increased by sending a salvage-effort personalized surgeon letter to sports medicine patients who failed to respond to initial (centralized electronic, mail, and/or phone contacts) PROMs collection 1 year after surgery. Patients who failed to respond to 1-year follow-up of postoperative PROMs collection at our outpatient sports medicine surgery center were included. Patients were randomized into an intervention or control group. Patients in the intervention group were mailed PROMs form and an Institutional Review Board-approved letter that was personalized with surgical information, surgeon picture, and surgeon signature. Control group was mailed the same letter a month later. Chi-squared analysis was conducted at 5 weeks. Out of 843 surgeries, our initial 1-year PROMs follow-up rate was 65%, which allowed for 292 patients to be eligible for our study. After exclusions, 281 patients (randomized to 140 control group and 141 intervention group) were included in our study. We found a 20% response rate in the intervention group with 28 patients returning PROMs as compared with a 1.4% rate in the control group with two patients returning PROMs. The odds ratio was 17.1 (95% confidence interval: 4–73.3; p < 0.0001). A salvage-effort personalized surgeon letter is an efficient and relatively cost-effective method to increase PROMs follow-up rate, which means that a personalized surgeon letter can reach and engage patients who would otherwise be considered lost to follow-up, allowing for better outcomes monitoring after surgery.
Keywords
patient follow-up - patient-reported outcomes - PROMs - postoperative follow-up - sports medicineCorporate Authorship: * Cleveland Clinic OME Sports Health: Peter Evans, MD, PhD; Lutul Farrow, MD; Ryan Goodwin, MD; Morgan H. Jones, MD, MPH, Anthony Miniaci, MD; Richard Parker, MD; James Rosneck, MD; Paul Saluan, MD; Mark Schickendantz, MD, Kurt P. Spindler, MD.
Publication History
Received: 15 August 2018
Accepted: 18 June 2019
Article published online:
07 August 2019
© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Porter ME. What is value in health care?. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (26) 2477-2481
- 2 Peters M, Crocker H, Jenkinson C, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R. The routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for long-term conditions in primary care: a cohort survey. BMJ Open 2014; 4 (02) e003968
- 3 Rolfson O, Eresian Chenok K, Bohm E. et al; Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries. Acta Orthop 2016; 87 (01) (Suppl. 01) 3-8
- 4 Bozic KJ, Stacey B, Berger A, Sadosky A, Oster G. Resource utilization and costs before and after total joint arthroplasty. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12 (01) 73
- 5 Kim J, Lonner JH, Nelson CL, Lotke PA. Response bias: effect on outcomes evaluation by mail surveys after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (01) 15-21
- 6 Norquist BM, Goldberg BA, Matsen III FA. Challenges in evaluating patients lost to follow-up in clinical studies of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82 (06) 838-842
- 7 Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ. et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (03) MR000008
- 8 Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF. et al; CONSORT. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2012; 10 (01) 28-55
- 9 Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285 (15) 1987-1991
- 10 Scott P, Edwards P. Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6 (01) 111
- 11 Nedefhof A. Effects of a final telephone reminder and questionnaire cover design in mail surveys. Soc Sci Res 1988; 17 (04) 353-361
- 12 Etter J-F, Cucherat M, Perneger TV. Questionnaire color and response rates to mailed surveys. A randomized trial and a meta-analysis. Eval Health Prof 2002; 25 (02) 185-199
- 13 Hartley J, Rutherford A. The effects of using colored paper to boost response-rates to surveys and questionnaires. J Tech Writ Commun 2003; 33 (01) 29-40
- 14 Andrawis J, Akhavan S, Chan V, Lehil M, Pong D, Bozic KJ. Higher preoperative patient activation associated with better patient-reported outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (08) 2688-2697
- 15 Duffett L. Patient engagement: what partnering with patient in research is all about. Thromb Res 2017; 150: 113-120
- 16 Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013; 32 (02) 207-214