Thromb Haemost 2019; 119(08): 1199-1201
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693412
Theme Issue Editorial Focus
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Next-Generation Therapeutic Concepts for Atherosclerosis: Focus on Cell Specificity and Noncoding RNAs

Lucia Natarelli
1  Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany
,
Christian Weber
1  Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany
2  German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
3  Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, University of Maastricht, ER Maastricht, the Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

18 June 2019

18 June 2019

Publication Date:
02 August 2019 (online)

Atherosclerosis has been defined as an inflammatory disease developing primarily at arterial branching points and curvatures, where disturbed flow constantly inflicts low-grade injury to the endothelial monolayer lining the vessel wall. This step seems to be crucial for atheroprogression, because the maladaptation of endothelial cells (ECs) to this physiological disturbance increases the susceptibility of branching points to a proinflammatory state. Consequently, maladapted ECs make arterial branching points more prone to circulating and oxidized low-density lipoproteins (oxLDLs) influx in the subendothelial space, and promote the recruitment of monocytes by releasing proinflammatory molecules (i.e., chemokine and adhesion molecules). Subendothelial monocytes differentiate into macrophages, which locally proliferate and take up oxLDL. Exacerbation of lipid deposition into the plaque leads to insufficient lipoprotein scavenging by macrophages, which turn into foam cells. Advanced lesion progression is characterized by an accumulation of lipoproteins, macrophage-derived foam cell apoptosis and necrosis due to defective efferocytosis, formation of cholesterol crystals, and smooth muscle cell (SMC) cap formation. Hence, growing of advanced lesions leads to a critical reduction of arterial lumen and blood flow, reduced oxygen supply, and rupture or erosion of the plaques, which can cause thrombosis.

By analyzing aforementioned phases of plaque development, it has become evident that inflammation plays a crucial role in atheroprogression. It is therefore not surprising that many of the therapies currently used to treat atherosclerosis and thrombus formation focus on counteracting the onset of an acute inflammatory state. Notably, statins are capable not only of lowering cholesterol levels but also to exert anti-inflammatory effects. Accordingly, studies conducted using colchicine, canakinumab, an antibody to interleukin (IL)-1β, or other modalities targeting IL-6 or IL-1 receptors are aimed at more specifically reducing inflammatory activity during atherosclerosis.[1] However, current anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic therapies are far from lacking side effects, although the risk–benefit ratio still makes them an indispensable choice improving the life expectancy of patients with cardiovascular diseases.

The exponential growth of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), single-cell sequencing databases, and context-based text mining has brought to light the existence of complex regulatory networks triggering cardiovascular disease. Among these, the heterogeneity and interconnection of vascular cell populations, as well as their selective contribution to distinct stages of atherosclerosis particularly stand out ([Fig. 1]). Moreover, GWAS have shown disease-linked genetic variation in the nonprotein-coding sequence space, which are actively transcribed to noncoding ribonucleic acids (ncRNAs), that is, micro- and long ncRNAs (miRNAs and lncRNAs). This novel class of ncRNAs is differentially expressed in diseased tissues and act as epigenetic modulators of gene expression. Indeed, the Part 2 of the Theme Issue on atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis brings together the innovative and provocative view of expert scientists on novel therapeutic perspectives. Among these, the identification of phenotype- and cell-to-cell interaction-related molecules, as well as epigenetic modulatory-related molecules, as novel and selective therapeutic targets to treat atherosclerosis.

Review articles by Busygina et al[2] and Pircher et al[3] underscore a fundamental problem with current immunotherapies. Indeed, antiplatelet and collagen inhibitors, such as the first-in-class oral irreversible Bruton tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitors (ibrutinib and acalabrutinib), show bleeding side effects. These are partly ascribable to complex off-target mechanisms of drug concentrations used to treat, for example, B cell malignancies and not required for the inhibition of glycoprotein VI-mediated response of platelets to low collagen or plaque. Busygina et al[2] summarized the last clinical trials on antithrombotic drugs and underlie the relevance of a short-term application of novel reversible Btk inhibitors to avoid bleeding side effects. At the same time, Pircher et al[3] introduce novel therapeutic targets with focus on cell-to-cell interaction. Following plaque rupture, highly thrombogenic plaque content become exposed to blood stream and mediate platelet and neutrophil recruitment. Neutrophils and platelets reciprocally sustain their activation and promote inflammation by exposing adhesion molecules, such as P-selectin, P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1, and, as recently emerged, by releasing citrullinated histone 3-rich extracellular traps (neutrophil extracellular traps [NETs]). Notably, neutrophil-deriving NETs can serve as scaffold for platelet aggregation, and sustain inflammation and thrombosis. Hence, Pircher et al[3] introduce novel short-term platelet inhibition treatments in acute thrombosis aimed to inhibit neutrophil–platelet aggregation, with potentially less side effects than those from established long antithrombotic therapies.

Monocyte-derived macrophages are a perfect example of stage-dependent cell phenotypic change during atherosclerosis. Aside the concept that macrophage polarization can be reprogrammed by inflammatory stimuli, Stremmel et al[4] here underline how the shift between inflammatory (M1-like) and proliferative (M2-like) macrophages is the resultant of their metabolic changes. Notably, M1-like macrophages utilize glycolytic metabolism while M2-like macrophages feature mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid metabolism. However, macrophages metabolism is altered during atherosclerosis. Herein, Stremmel et al interestingly discuss how immunometabolism might be used to target selective macrophage subpopulation in dependence of their form of energy supply.

Heterogeneity of cells involved in atherosclerosis is therefore a critical point to consider to generate more selective therapeutic drugs and to reduce side effects. Moreover, it could also explain why current therapies do not show the same beneficial effects in all patients. The epigenetic aspect could be the missing link to develop more selective and effective therapies. The review articles by Eckardt et al,[5] Paloschi et al,[6] and Holdt et al[7] exactly describe glycan-binding proteins, miRNAs, and lncRNAs selective epigenetic biomarkers as novel and potential therapeutic targets to treat atherosclerosis. Vascular glycans are dynamically influenced by the physiological state of the cells, which is read and translated into function by glycan-binding proteins. Therefore, glycans represent the “footprint” of the cells at a selective pathophysiological stage. Eckardt at al[5] discuss how glycans could be used as intermediate between a drug and its target to increase drug specificity. Notably, mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance studies identified lectins and galectins as therapeutic biomarkers and thrombotic targets. However, the complexity of glycan structures makes their identification and structural function analysis difficult, and at the moment only heparins have been customized for anti-inflammatory therapies.

ncRNAs are a new class of — “mechanistically easy-to-study” — epigenetically modulated molecular markers that offer a selective therapeutic advantage. Paloschi et al[6] and Holdt et al[7] describe selective inhibition/overexpression of miRNAs and lncRNAs as more off-target, easy delivery, and less side effect therapeutic alternative to conventional immunotherapies. In particular, Paloschi et al overview the role of ncRNAs in myeloid cells, or released from arterial cells for myeloid recruitment, to modulate inflammatory cascade during vascular disease. Notably, administration of miR-126–5p mimics restore impaired endothelial proliferation, whereas miR-181b and miR-92a inhibition reduces inflammation. Similarly, exosome-released lncRNCR3 protect against hypercholesterolemia-induced EC and SMC dysfunction, whereas lincRNA-p21, MeXis, and MALAT1 promote macrophage anti-inflammatory role and cholesterol efflux. As underlined in the review by Holdt et al,[7] current RNA therapeutic trials exclusively involve small interfering RNAs and mRNAs, but not yet lncRNAs. However, to consider lncRNA-centered therapies we should first take some issues into consideration. First, some lncRNAs are poorly conserved between mouse and human. Second, some of the ncRNAs reported as potential therapeutic candidates show different effects depending on the disease considered. For example, MALAT1 overexpression reduces atherosclerosis, but it is also cancer-promoting. Third, miRNAs and lncRNAs can affect their activation, playing opposite roles during atherosclerosis. Indeed, sponge activity of lncRNA MEG3 and MALAT1 on miR-21–3p and miR-22–3p, respectively, affect EC proliferation and apoptosis during atherosclerosis. Moreover, one miRNA can target bot mRNAs and lncRNAs, such as athero-miR-103, which promote EC inflammation by targeting KLF4,[8] and impairs EC regeneration by targeting lncWDR59.[9] To avoid side effects and off-targeting, Holdt et al[7] describe the use of synthetic circular lncRNAs, which can play even a different role compared with their endogenous counterparts, that can be packaged in lipid vesicles, conjugated to antibodies, or (current modern approach) eluted from coated stents and perivascular hydrogels. Accordingly, while linear ANRIL promote atherosclerosis, circular ANRIL mediates opposite, protective effects.

Reading these reviews reveals how innovative but at the same time how complex it will be to consider epigenetically relevant molecules as more selective alternative therapies. The context-based atheMir database introduced by Joppich et al[10] is a database of miRNA–gene interaction networks that offer a good starting point to investigate epigenetic molecule interconnections in a cell-to-cell and phase–context dependent manner during atherosclerosis. Based on scientifically supported evidences and reported interactions, atheMir explores new selective miRNA–gene interaction hypothesis in cardiovascular diseases, that is, endothelial and monocytes miR-126 and miR-155/222 role in early atherosclerotic stages, and SMC miR-98 and miR-504 role at later stages.

Although considered the “dark side of the genome,” this ncRNA force in humans probably derives from the ability (or attempt) of nature being to develop a new evolutionary stage to adapt more easily to the cumulatively higher risk of cardiovascular diseases related to a longer life time.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Micro (miRNAs)- and long noncoding ribonucleic acids (lncRNAs') role during atherosclerosis. Graphical overview of the major miRNAs and lncRNAs reviewed in the Theme Issue. MiRNAs and lncRNAs contribute to atherosclerosis alone or by affecting their reciprocal activation. Hyperlipidemia impairs endothelial regeneration inhibiting miR-126–5p expression and promoting proinflammatory miR-92a and miR-103. The majority of lncRNAs are downregulated during atherosclerosis, suggesting that their overexpression might be promising to prevent plaque progression. Indeed, MALAT1, HOTAIR, lncWDR59, and circANRIL sustain endothelial regeneration and prevent their apoptosis and inflammation. However, linear ANRIL, lncMRC3, and PACER promote endothelial inflammation and smooth muscle cell (SMC) cup formation. Monocyte recruitment is enhanced by endothelial release of miR-10a. At early stages of atherosclerosis, miR-155 and miR-195 inhibit M2-like macrophage proliferation. However, miR-342–5p-mediated increase of miR-155 expression, miR-21 overexpression, and miR-195 inhibition, all together sustain M1-like inflammatory macrophage polarization and defective efferocytosis. CircANRIL, MeXis, and lncRNA HOCX-AS1 are downregulated during these stages, and therefore cannot inhibit chronic inflammation. SMC miRNAs and lncRNAs, such as miR-146a/145/21/26a, NEAT1, SENCR, and ANRIL, seem to synergistically promote their proliferation and to contribute at cup formation. CircANRIL is instead acting as SMC proliferative agonist.