CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Annals of Otology and Neurotology 2019; 02(01): 10-15
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693095
Original Article
Indian Society of Otology

Correlation of Site and Size of Tympanic Membrane Perforation and Middle Ear Air Space Volume with Magnitude of Hearing Loss

Ramandeep Singh Virk
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
,
Krishan Kudawla
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
,
Sandeep Bansal
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
,
Ramya Rathod
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
,
Samarendra Behera
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 13. Februar 2019

Accepted: 16. Mai 2019

Publikationsdatum:
16. Juli 2019 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The effects of tympanic membrane perforations on middle ear sound transmission are not well characterized, largely because ears with perforations typically have additional pathological changes. It has been established that the larger the perforation, the greater is the hearing loss (HL).

Aim This study aimed to correlate the location and size of tympanic membrane perforation and middle ear air space volume with the magnitude of HL in patients with tubotympanic or inactive mucosal type of chronic otitis media (COM).

Materials and Methods A prospective clinical study of patients with tympanic membrane perforations due to COM and without any other ear disease and who attended the Otolaryngology services at our institute between July 2010 and December 2011 was conducted. A total of 300 ears were evaluated by performing otoendoscopy, followed by photo documentation and audiological investigations (pure-tone audiometry and tympanometry). Tympanic membrane perforations were categorized based on their size and location, and the mean air-bone (AB) gap between the various types of perforations was compared and statistically analyzed with significance level of p < 0.05.

Results Out of 300 ears, maximum number of ears (n = 124, 41.3%) had large-sized perforations (> 30 mm2) that had a maximum mean AB gap of 26.43 dB, and minimum number of ears (n = 60, 20%) had small-sized perforations (0–9 mm2) that had minimum mean AB gap of 9.12 dB. The remaining were medium-sized perforations that had mean AB gap of 16.13 dB. Depending on the location, maximum were central perforations (n = 198, 66%) and minimum were anterosuperior (AS) perforations (n = 9, 3%). Based on the middle ear volume on tympanometry, maximum ears were of low-volume group (n = 246, 92%) that had larger mean AB gap of 19.96 dB HL when compared with the high-volume group (n = 24, 8%) with 11.80 dB HL. AB gap was maximum at lower frequencies and decreased with increase in frequencies except at 4,000 Hz, that is, 56.9 dB HL at 250 Hz, 42.6 at 500 Hz, 41.5 at 1,000 Hz, 32.4 at 2,000 Hz, and 49.5 at 4,000 Hz.

Conclusion HL increases as the area of tympanic membrane perforation increases. There is an inverse relationship between HL and middle ear air space volume. Comparing the small-sized perforations at different sites with the middle ear volume being low, it was found that posterosuperior (PS) perforations had 4 to 7 dB greater HL than AS and anteroinferior (AI). However, the relationship was statistically insignificant. The phase cancellation effect of round window causing greater HL in posteroinferior (PI) perforations does not exist in small- and medium-sized perforations. HL is greater at lower frequencies and less at higher frequencies.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ogisi FO, Adobamen P. Type 1 tympanoplasty in Benin: a 10- year review. Niger. Postgrad Med J 2004; 11 (02) 84-87
  • 2 Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT. Non-ossicular signal transmission in human middle ears: experimental assessment of the “acoustic route” with perforated tympanic membranes. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122 (04) 2135-2153
  • 3 Ibekwe TS, Nwaorgu OG, Ijaduola TG. Correlating the site of tympanic membrane perforation with hearing loss. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2009
  • 4 Chole R, Sudhoff HH. Chronic otitis media. In: Cummings Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 5th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2005: 4985-4986
  • 5 Maharjan M, Kafle P, Bista M, Shrestha S, Toran KC. Observation of hearing loss in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media tubotympanic type. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2009; 7 (28) 397-401
  • 6 Bluestone CD. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of chronic suppurative otitis media: implications for prevention and treatment. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 42 (3) 207-223
  • 7 American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck. Perforated Ear Drum. [Internet] 2005 [cited March 2010]. Available at http://www.entnet.org/HealthInformation/perforatedEardrum.cfm
  • 8 Ahmad SW, Ramani GV. Hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol 1979; 93 (11) 1091-1098
  • 9 Ronald NJ, McRac RD, McCombe AW. Chronic suppurative otitis media. In: Key Topics in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2nd ed. Wales: Bios Scientific Publishers 2001. 38–41
  • 10 Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT. How do tympanic-membrane perforations affect human middle-ear sound transmission?. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121 (02) 169-173
  • 11 Kruger B, Tonndorf J. Middle ear transmission in cats with experimentally induced tympanic membrane perforations. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 61 (01) 126-132
  • 12 Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ. Auditory physiology and middle-ear mechanics. In: Glasscock ME, Guliya AJ, eds. Surgery of the Ear. 5th ed. Ontario: BC Decker 2003; : 59-82
  • 13 Mehta RP, Rosowski JJ, Voss SE, O’Neil E, Merchant SN. Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27 (02) 136-143
  • 14 Ibekwe TS, Adeosun AA, Nwaorgu OG. Quantitative analysis of tympanic membrane perforation: a simple and reliable method. J Laryngol Otol 2009
  • 15 Durko T, Latkowski B. Extrameatal myringoplasty in the treatment of tympanic membrane perforations [article in Polish]. Otolaryngol Pol 1997; 51 (Suppl 25) 274-277
  • 16 Pannu KK, Chadha S, Kumar D. Preeti. Evaluation of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation. Indian J. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 63 (03) 208-213
  • 17 Nepal A, Bhandary S, Mishra SC, Singh I, Kumar P. The morphology of central tympanic membrane perforations. Nepal Med Coll J 2007; 9 (04) 239-244
  • 18 Matsuda Y, Kurita T, Ueda Y, Ito S, Nakashima T. Effect of tympanic membrane perforation on middle-ear sound transmission. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 2009; 123 (31, Suppl S31): 81-89
  • 19 Oluwole M, Mills RP. Tympanic membrane perforations in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1996; 36 (02) 117-123
  • 20 Bhusal CL, Shrivastav R. Correlation of hearing impairment with site of tympanic membrane perforation. J Inst Med 2005; 27 (02) 91-96
  • 21 Yung MW. Myringoplasty: hearing gain in relation to perforation site. J Laryngol Otol 1983; 97 (01) 11-17
  • 22 Oktay MF, Cureoglu S, Schachern PA, Paparella MM, Kariya S, Fukushima H. Tympanic membrane changes in central tympanic membrane perforations. Am J Otolaryngol 2005; 26 (06) 393-397