CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2019; 54(03): 268-274
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692458
Artigo Original | Original Article
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revnter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Flexor Tendon Injury: Avascular or Vascularized Region Suture? Biomechanical and Histopathological Study in Rabbits[]

Article in several languages: português | English
1   Departamento de Cirurgia e Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brasil
,
Sergio Swain Muller
1   Departamento de Cirurgia e Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brasil
,
Kunie Iabuk Rabello Coelho
2   Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brasil
,
Denis Varanda
1   Departamento de Cirurgia e Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brasil
,
Andrea Christina Cortopassi
1   Departamento de Cirurgia e Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brasil
,
Gilberto José Cação Pereira
1   Departamento de Cirurgia e Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brasil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

29 January 2018

10 July 2018

Publication Date:
27 June 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objectives The present study aims to analyze the mechanical and histopathological aspects of flexor tendon healing focusing on the suture placement site in a vascular or in an avascular region.

Methods A total of 83 rabbits were submitted to a Kessler-type central suture in the vascularized tendon region (TN group) and in the avascular tendon region (FC group). The operated limb was immobilized for 3 weeks. The animals were sacrificed in the immediate postoperative period, and at 2, 3 and 6 weeks after the procedure. The mechanical properties studied were: maximum load, stress at maximum load, modulus of elasticity, energy at maximum load, and energy per area. The contralateral tendon was used as control. The histopathological study was descriptive.

Results The analysis of the mechanical properties showed similar behavior in both groups, with stabilization or discrete increased values between the immediate period and 3 weeks after the procedure, and marked increased values at 6 weeks. Histopathology demonstrated that the healing process was similar in the TN and FC groups.

Conclusion Central suture placement in the vascularized or avascular fibrocartilaginous region results in no differences in the biomechanical and histopathological aspects of flexor tendon healing in rabbits.

The present study was performed at the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu of the Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP).


 
  • Referências

  • 1 Kleinert HE, Smith Jr DJ. Primary and secondary repairs of flexor and extensor tendon injuries. In: Jupiter JB. , editor. Flynn's hand surgery. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1991: 241-261
  • 2 Culp RW, Taras JS. Primary care of flexor tendon injuries. In: Hunter JM, Mackim EJ, Callahan AD. , editors. Rehabilitation of the hand: surgery and therapy. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995: 417-431
  • 3 Aoki M, Manske PR, Pruitt DL, Kubota H, Larson BJ. Work of flexion after flexor tendon repair according to the placement of sutures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (320) 205-210
  • 4 Soejima O, Diao E, Lotz JC, Hariharan JS. Comparative mechanical analysis of dorsal versus palmar placement of core suture for flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20 (05) 801-807
  • 5 Komanduri M, Phillips CS, Mass DP. Tensile strength of flexor tendon repairs in a dynamic cadaver model. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21 (04) 605-611
  • 6 Stein T, Ali A, Hamman J, Mass DP. A randomized biomechanical study of zone II human flexor tendon repairs analyzed in a linear model. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23 (06) 1043-1045
  • 7 Cao Y, Xie RG, Tang JB. Dorsal-enhanced sutures improve tension resistance of tendon repair. J Hand Surg [Br] 2002; 27 (02) 161-164
  • 8 Beredjiklian PK. Biologic aspects of flexor tendon laceration and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (03) 539-550
  • 9 Gillard GC, Reilly HC, Bell-Booth PG, Flint MH. The influence of mechanical forces on the glycosaminoglycan content of the rabbit flexor digitorum profundus tendon. Connect Tissue Res 1979; 7 (01) 37-46
  • 10 Merrilees MJ, Flint MH. Ultrastructural study of tension and pressure zones in a rabbit flexor tendon. Am J Anat 1980; 157 (01) 87-106
  • 11 Mills DK, Daniel JC. Development of functional specializations within the maturing rabbit flexor digitorum profundus tendon. Connect Tissue Res 1993; 30 (01) 37-57
  • 12 Normam GR, Streiner DL. Bioestatistics: the base essentials. St Louis: Mosby; 1994
  • 13 Stein T, Ali A, Hamman J, Mass DP. A randomized biomechanical study of zone II human flexor tendon repairs analyzed in an in vitro model. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23 (06) 1046-1051
  • 14 Xie RG, Zhang S, Tang JB, Chen F. Biomechanical studies of 3 different 6-strand flexor tendon repair techniques. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27 (04) 621-627
  • 15 Strickland JW. Flexor tendons: acute injuries. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC. , editors. Green's operative hand surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 1999: 1851-1897
  • 16 Wada A, Kubota H, Miyanishi K, Hatanaka H, Miura H, Iwamoto Y. Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilising a four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg [Br] 2001; 26 (04) 301-306
  • 17 Nessler JP, Amadio PC, Berglund LJ, An KN. Healing of canine tendon in zones subjected to different mechanical forces. J Hand Surg [Br] 1992; 17 (05) 561-568