Euclidean Relationship between the Superior Semicircular Canal and the Arcuate EminenceFunding Source None.
08 November 2018
04 February 2019
12 March 2019 (online)
Objective This study was aimed to better characterize the surgical anatomy of the floor of the middle cranial fossa using three dimensional Euclidean relationships between the arcuate eminence (AE), the superior semicircular canal (SSC), and the geniculate ganglion (GG).
Study Design Submillimeter distances were recorded from computed tomography (CT) scans of 50 patients (100 sides). The AE, apex of the SSC, and the GG were identified and three dimensional distances measured.
Setting The study was conducted at a tertiary academic teaching hospital.
Main Outcome Measures In this study, Euclidean distance was obtained from AE to SSC by using a fixed anatomical landmark (GG) as the origin.
Results On average, the AE is 2.1 ± 0.3 mm lateral, 2.5 ± 0.1 mm superior, and 2.1 ± 0.3 posterior to the SSC. Thirty percent (30/100) of patients had an AE that was less than 2 mm superior to SSC. The AE was medial to the SCC in 13% samples and anterior to the SSC in 18% samples. The results also show that there was no difference in mean distance between sides (1.08 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = − 2.67–0.52; p-value = 0.29) or gender (0.56mm; 95% CI = − 1.34, 2.45; p-value = 0.86).
Conclusions This study represents a comprehensive analysis of the relational anatomy of the floor of the middle fossa to date. In quantifying relationships between the AE, SSC, and GG, and by understanding the variability of these relationships in some planes, the middle fossa surgeon can feel more comfortable with this most challenging approach.
Keywordsmiddle fossa - arcuate eminence - superior semicircular canal - geniculate ganglion - anatomy
- 1 Seo Y, Ito T, Sasaki T, Nakagawara J, Nakamura H. Assessment of the anatomical relationship between the arcuate eminence and superior semicircular canal by computed tomography. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2007; 47 (08) 335-339 , discussion 339–340
- 2 Bulsara KR, Leveque J-C, Gray L, Fukushima T, Friedman AH, Villavicencio AT. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of the relationship between the arcuate eminence and the superior semicircular canal. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (01) (Suppl. 01) ONS7-ONS12 , discussion ONS7–ONS12
- 3 Tsunoda A, Komatsuzaki A, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y. Three-dimensional image for the middle fossa approach and its anatomical considerations. Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (06) 1048-1052
- 4 Faure A, Masse H, Gayet-Delacroix M. , et al. What is the arcuate eminence?. Surg Radiol Anat 2003; 25 (02) 99-104
- 5 Tsunoda A, Kimura Y, Sumi T, Komatsuzaki A, Sato T. The arcuate eminence is not a protrusion of the superior semi-circular canal but a trace of sulcus on the temporal lobe. J Laryngol Otol 2000; 114 (05) 339-344
- 6 Fisch U. Transtemporal surgery of the internal auditory canal. Report of 92 cases, technique, indications and results. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1970; 17: 203-240
- 7 House WF, Shelton C. Middle fossa approach for acoustic tumor removal. 1992. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2008; 19 (02) 279-288 , vi
- 8 Kartush JM, Kemink JL, Graham MD. The arcuate eminence. Topographic orientation in middle cranial fossa surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94 (1 Pt 1): 25-28
- 9 Djalilian HR, Thakkar KH, Hamidi S, Benson AG, Mafee MF. A study of middle cranial fossa anatomy and anatomic variations. Ear Nose Throat J 2007; 86 (08) 474-481 , 476–481
- 10 Singh A, Kumar R, Irugu DVK, Kumar R, Sagar P. Morphometric analysis of arcuate eminence: a distinctive landmark for middle cranial fossa approach. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018; 46 (10) 1703-1706
- 11 Santos FP, Longo MG, May GG, Isolan GR. Computed tomography evaluation of the correspondence between the arcuate eminence and the superior semicircular canal. World Neurosurg 2018; 111: e261-e266
- 12 Schneider D, Hermann J, Gerber KA. , et al. Noninvasive registration strategies and advanced image guidance technology for submillimeter surgical navigation accuracy in the lateral skull base. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (10) 1326-1335