Lateral Radial Head Subluxation as a Complication Following Proximal Ulnar Osteotomy or Ostectomy in Eight DogsFunding There is no grant or other financial support to disclose.
21 March 2018
08 January 2019
28 March 2019 (eFirst)
Objectives The aim of this study was to report the complication of lateral radial head subluxation following proximal ulnar osteotomy (PUOO) or proximal ulnar ostectomy (PUOE) in eight dogs.
Materials and Methods Case records and diagnostic imaging of dogs developing lateral radial head subluxation following PUOO (n = 7) or PUOE (n = 2) were retrospectively reviewed. Information pertaining to clinical history, signalment, presenting condition, lameness grade, diagnostic imaging and initial surgery details, postoperative complications and their management were retrieved. Outcomes were established from subsequent clinical histories or telephone interviews with referring veterinarians. Comparison was made to a single-centre cohort without lateral radial head subluxation following PUOO or PUOE.
Results Eight dogs (median age: 9.5 months [range: 6 months–6 years], median weight 7.7 kg [range: 5–28 kg]) were included. Six dogs had a PUOO performed; five dogs had unilateral surgery and one had bilateral surgery. Two dogs had unilateral PUOE surgery. Median time to diagnosis of lateral radial head subluxation following surgery was 6.5 weeks (range: 2–20 weeks). Five of the eight dogs had surgical revision of lateral radial head subluxation. Resolution of lateral radial head subluxation was achieved in four dogs, with three achieving acceptable to good mobility. One dog had poor postoperative mobility. A fifth dog remained lame after revision surgery failure. Three dogs did not have revision surgery; two underwent limb amputation and one dog remained lame as revision surgery was declined.
Clinical Significance Lateral radial head subluxation is a potentially severe postoperative complication following PUOO or PUOE.
Keywordsproximal ulnar osteotomy - proximal ulnar ostectomy - radial head subluxation - complication
Heather Williams, Gareth Arthurs, Neil Burton, Elvin Kulendra and Kevin Parsons contributed to acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. H. Radke contributed to acquisition of data. G. Arthurs and K. Parsons also contributed to conception of study and study design. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.
- 1 Fitzpatrick N, Caron A, Solano MA. Bi-oblique dynamic proximal ulnar osteotomy in dogs: reconstructed computed tomographic assessment of radioulnar congruence over 12 weeks. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (06) 727-738
- 2 Michelsen J. Canine elbow dysplasia: aetiopathogenesis and current treatment recommendations. Vet J 2013; 196 (01) 12-19
- 3 Preston CA, Schulz KS, Taylor KT, Kass PH, Hagan CE, Stover SM. In vitro experimental study of the effect of radial shortening and ulnar ostectomy on contact patterns in the elbow joint of dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62 (10) 1548-1556
- 4 Gilson SD, Piermattei DL, Schwarz PD. Treatment of humeroulnar subluxation with a dynamic proximal ulnar osteotomy. A review of 13 cases. Vet Surg 1989; 18 (02) 114-122
- 5 Sjöström L, Kasström H, Källberg M. Ununited anconeal process in the dog. Pathogenesis and treatment by osteotomy of the ulna. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8: 170-176
- 6 Might KR, Hanzlik KA, Case JB. , et al. In vitro comparison of proximal ulnar osteotomy and distal ulnar osteotomy with release of the interosseous ligament in a canine model. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (03) 321-326
- 7 Snelling SR, Lavelle RB. Radiographic changes in elbow dysplasia following ulnar osteotomy--a case report and review of the literature. Aust Vet J 2004; 82 (05) 278-281
- 8 Griffon D. Ulna Osteotomy and Ostectomy. Complications in Small Animal Surgery. 1st ed. Ames, Iowa; Chichester, UK; Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2016: 924-929
- 9 Böttcher P, Bräuer S, Werner H. Estimation of joint incongruence in dysplastic canine elbows before and after dynamic proximal ulnar osteotomy. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (04) 371-376
- 10 Krotscheck U, Kalafut S, Meloni G. , et al. Effect of ulnar ostectomy on intra-articular pressure mapping and contact mechanics of the congruent and incongruent canine elbow ex vivo. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (03) 339-346
- 11 Pettitt RA, Tattersall J, Gemmill T. , et al. Effect of surgical technique on radiographic fusion of the anconeus in the treatment of ununited anconeal process. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50 (10) 545-548
- 12 Ness MG. Treatment of fragmented coronoid process in young dogs by proximal ulnar osteotomy. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39 (01) 15-18
- 13 Caron A, Fitzpatrick N. Bi-oblique proximal ulnar osteotomy: surgical technique and clinical outcome in 86 dogs. Vet Surg 2016; 45 (03) 356-363
- 14 Coggeshall JD, Reese DJ, Kim SE, Pozzi A. Arthroscopic-guided ulnar distraction for the correction of elbow incongruency in four dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2014; 55 (01) 46-51
- 15 Fox DBCh. 54, Radius & Ulna. In: Johnston SA, Tobias KM. , eds. Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2017: 919
- 16 Kraus K, Bayer B. Delayed Unions, Nonunions and Malunions. In: Tobias K, Johnston S. , eds. Veterinary Small Animal Surgery, Volume 1. Canada: Saunders Elsevier; 2012: 647-653
- 17 Blaeser LL, Gallagher JG, Boudrieau RJ. Treatment of biologically inactive nonunions by a limited en bloc ostectomy and compression plate fixation: a review of 17 cases. Vet Surg 2003; 32 (01) 91-100
- 18 Rouleau DM, Sandman E, Canet F. , et al. Radial head translation measurement in healthy individuals: the radiocapitellar ratio. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21 (05) 574-579