All About Shoulder Arthroplasty: What Radiologists Should Know

Karen C. Chen; James Y. Chen

doi:10.1055/s-0039-1683359

Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2019; 23(02): 126-140
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683359

Review Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

All About Shoulder Arthroplasty: What Radiologists Should Know

Authors

Karen C. Chen

¹Department of Radiology, Veterans Administration Healthcare System San Diego, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
James Y. Chen

¹Department of Radiology, Veterans Administration Healthcare System San Diego, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California

Abstract

Over the last decade, the number of shoulder arthroplasty procedures has been increasing and evolving. The types of prostheses have also been evolving, and familiarity with the various design types will assist in postoperative assessment for hardware complications. New preoperative planning tools are available that have radically changed the protocol of preoperative image studies performed. This article reviews the main types of shoulder prostheses, discusses radiologic studies required before surgery, and describes the common complications of shoulder arthroplasty.

Keywords

shoulder arthroplasty - hemiarthroplasty - reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Arshi A, Leong NL, Wang C. , et al. Relative complications and trends of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2018; 41 (03) e400-e409
2 Boselli KJ, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. Treatment of glenohumeral arthrosis. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (12) 2558-2572
3 Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82 (04) 498-504
4 Hammond G, Tibone JE, McGarry MH, Jun BJ, Lee TQ. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic humeral head resurfacing and hemiarthroplasty in functional glenohumeral positions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (01) 68-76
5 Harjula JNE, Paloneva J, Haapakoski J, Kukkonen J, Äärimaa V. ; Finnish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry Group. Increasing incidence of primary shoulder arthroplasty in Finland—a nationwide registry study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19 (01) 245
6 Saupe N, Pfirrmann CW, Schmid MR, Jost B, Werner CM, Zanetti M. Association between rotator cuff abnormalities and reduced acromiohumeral distance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (02) 376-382
7 Bryce CD, Davison AC, Lewis GS, Wang L, Flemming DJ, Armstrong AD. Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (03) 692-699
8 Budge MD, Lewis GS, Schaefer E, Coquia S, Flemming DJ, Armstrong AD. Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20 (04) 577-583
9 Hoenecke Jr HR, Hermida JC, Flores-Hernandez C, D'Lima DD. Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19 (02) 166-171
10 Bishop JY, Jones GL, Rerko MA, Donaldson C. ; MOON Shoulder Group. 3-D CT is the most reliable imaging modality when quantifying glenoid bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (04) 1251-1256
11 Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (06) 756-760
12 Farron A, Terrier A, Büchler P. Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15 (04) 521-526
13 Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Atkinson TS, Jacob HA, Favre P, Gerber C. Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15 (05) 625-629
14 Gregory TM, Sankey A, Augereau B. , et al. Accuracy of glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty and its effect on clinical and radiological outcome in a retrospective, longitudinal, monocentric open study. PLoS One 2013; 8 (10) e75791
15 Favre P, Sussmann PS, Gerber C. The effect of component positioning on intrinsic stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19 (04) 550-556
16 Gutiérrez S, Comiskey IV CA, Luo ZP, Pupello DR, Frankle MA. Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (12) 2606-2615
17 Dallalana RJ, McMahon RA, East B, Geraghty L. Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Int J Shoulder Surg 2016; 10 (02) 59-66
18 Throckmorton TW, Gulotta LV, Bonnarens FO. , et al. Patient-specific targeting guides compared with traditional instrumentation for glenoid component placement in shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-surgeon study in 70 arthritic cadaver specimens. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24 (06) 965-971
19 Hendel MD, Bryan JA, Barsoum WK. , et al. Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (23) 2167-2175
20 Heylen S, Van Haver A, Vuylsteke K, Declercq G, Verborgt O. Patient-specific instrument guidance of glenoid component implantation reduces inclination variability in total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25 (02) 186-192
21 Iannotti JP, Weiner S, Rodriguez E. , et al. Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (08) 651-658
22 Zheng YX, Yu DF, Zhao JG, Wu YL, Zheng B. 3D printout models vs. 3D-rendered images: which is better for preoperative planning?. J Surg Educ 2016; 73 (03) 518-523
23 Tam MD, Laycock SD, Bell D, Chojnowski A. 3-D printout of a DICOM file to aid surgical planning in a 6 year old patient with a large scapular osteochondroma complicating congenital diaphyseal aclasia. J Radiol Case Rep 2012; 6 (01) 31-37
24 Sheth U, Theodoropoulos J, Abouali J. Use of 3-dimensional printing for preoperative planning in the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Arthrosc Tech 2015; 4 (04) e311-e316
25 Liu D, Fu J, Fan H. , et al. Application of 3D-printed PEEK scapula prosthesis in the treatment of scapular benign fibrous histiocytoma: a case report. J Bone Oncol 2018; 12: 78-82
26 Norwood LA, Barrack R, Jacobson KE. Clinical presentation of complete tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71 (04) 499-505
27 Chang EY, Du J, Bae WC, Chung CB. Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time imaging of musculoskeletal tissues. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2015; 19 (04) 375-386
28 Chang EY, Du J, Chung CB. UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 41 (04) 870-883
29 Carl M, Bydder GM, Du J. UTE imaging with simultaneous water and fat signal suppression using a time-efficient multispoke inversion recovery pulse sequence. Magn Reson Med 2016; 76 (02) 577-582
30 Ma YJ, West J, Nazaran A. , et al. Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss. Skeletal Radiol 2018; 47 (07) 973-980
31 Burgess DL, McGrath MS, Bonutti PM, Marker DR, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Shoulder resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (05) 1228-1238
32 Uribe JW, Botto-van Bemden A. Partial humeral head resurfacing for osteonecrosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18 (05) 711-716
33 Sweet SJ, Takara T, Ho L, Tibone JE. Primary partial humeral head resurfacing: outcomes with the HemiCAP implant. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (03) 579-587
34 Merolla G, Di Pietto F, Romano S, Paladini P, Campi F, Porcellini G. Radiographic analysis of shoulder anatomical arthroplasty. Eur J Radiol 2008; 68 (01) 159-169
35 Sanchez-Sotelo J, Wright TW, O'Driscoll SW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Radiographic assessment of uncemented humeral components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (02) 180-187
36 Sperling JW, Kozak TK, Hanssen AD, Cofield RH. Infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (382) 206-216
37 Saltzman MD, Marecek GS, Edwards SL, Kalainov DM. Infection after shoulder surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (04) 208-218
38 Ricchetti ET, Frangiamore SJ, Grosso MJ. , et al. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 2013; 1 (01) ):pii: 01874474-201311000-00005
39 Love C, Marwin SE, Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine and the infected joint replacement. Semin Nucl Med 2009; 39 (01) 66-78
40 Love C, Tomas MB, Tronco GG, Palestro CJ. FDG PET of infection and inflammation. Radiographics 2005; 25 (05) 1357-1368
41 Favard L. Revision of total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99 (1, Suppl): S12-S21
42 Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M. , et al. Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (02) 217-219
43 Athwal GS, Sperling JW, Rispoli DM, Cofield RH. Periprosthetic humeral fractures during shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (03) 594-603
44 Wiater JM, Fabing MH. Shoulder arthroplasty: prosthetic options and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17 (07) 415-425
45 Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood Jr CA. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (10) 2279-2292
46 Lazarus MD, Jensen KL, Southworth C, Matsen III FA. The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A (07) 1174-1182
47 Franklin JL, Barrett WP, Jackins SE, Matsen III FA. Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. Association with rotator cuff deficiency. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3 (01) 39-46
48 Walch G, Young AA, Boileau P, Loew M, Gazielly D, Molé D. Patterns of loosening of polyethylene keeled glenoid components after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than five years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (02) 145-150
49 Nwawka OKG, Konin GP, Sneag DB, Gulotta LV, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance imaging of shoulder arthroplasty: review article. HSS J 2014; 10 (03) 213-224
50 Sofka CM, Adler RS. Original report. Sonographic evaluation of shoulder arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180 (04) 1117-1120
51 Mollon B, Mahure SA, Roche CP, Zuckerman JD. Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26 (07) 1253-1261
52 Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (08) 1742-1747
53 Cuff D, Clark R, Pupello D, Frankle M. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (21) 1996-2000
54 Favard L, Levigne C, Nerot C, Gerber C, De Wilde L, Mole D. Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (09) 2469-2475
55 Grammont PTP, Laffay JP, Deries X. Concept study and realization of a new total shoulder prosthesis [in French]. Rhumatologie 1987; 39: 407-418
56 Roberts CC, Ekelund AL, Renfree KJ, Liu PT, Chew FS. Radiologic assessment of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Radiographics 2007; 27 (01) 223-235
57 Jazayeri R, Kwon YW. Evolution of the reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2011; 69 (01) 50-55
58 Middernacht B, De Wilde L, Molé D, Favard L, Debeer P. Glenosphere disengagement: a potentially serious default in reverse shoulder surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (04) 892-898
59 Ascione F, Kilian CM, Laughlin MS. , et al. Increased scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a humeral onlay short stem: an analysis of 485 consecutive cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27 (12) 2183-2190
60 Farshad M, Gerber C. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop 2010; 34 (08) 1075-1082
61 Mufty S, Milants P, Reynaert P, Mulier T. Clavicular stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a case report. JBJS Case Connect 2016; 6 (01) e18
62 Valenti PBD, Nerot C. DELTA III reversed prosthesis for osteoarthritis with massive rotator cuff tear: long term results (>5 years). In: Walch G, Mole D. , eds. 2000 Shoulder Prostheses. Two to Ten Years Follow-Up. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2001: 253-259
63 Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Molé D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (03) 388-395
64 Hattrup SJ, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Reverse shoulder replacement for patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (09) 1888-1894
65 Smith CD, Guyver P, Bunker TD. Indications for reverse shoulder replacement: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (05) 577-583
66 Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14 (1, Suppl S): 147S-161S
67 Wahlquist TC, Hunt AF, Braman JP. Acromial base fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: report of five cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20 (07) 1178-1183
68 Nowinski RJ, Gillespie RJ, Shishani Y, Cohen B, Walch G, Gobezie R. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement reduces deep infection rates for primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective, cohort study of 501 shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21 (03) 324-328
69 Lädermann A, Ceroni D, Lefèvre Y, De Rosa V, De Coulon G, Kaelin A. Surgical treatment of missed Monteggia lesions in children. J Child Orthop 2007; 1 (04) 237-242
70 Frazzini VI, Kagetsu NJ, Johnson CE, Destian S. Internally stabilized spine: optimal choice of frequency-encoding gradient direction during MR imaging minimizes susceptibility artifact from titanium vertebral body screws. Radiology 1997; 204 (01) 268-272
71 Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH. , et al. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171 (05) 1207-1213
72 Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA. , et al. Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics 2014; 34 (01) 217-233
73 Naraghi AM, White LM. Magnetic resonance imaging of joint replacements. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2006; 10 (01) 98-106
74 Koch KM, Lorbiecki JE, Hinks RS, King KF. A multispectral three-dimensional acquisition technique for imaging near metal implants. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61 (02) 381-390
75 Lu W, Pauly KB, Gold GE, Pauly JM, Hargreaves BA. SEMAC: Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62 (01) 66-76
76 Hayter CL, Koff MF, Shah P, Koch KM, Miller TT, Potter HG. MRI after arthroplasty: comparison of MAVRIC and conventional fast spin-echo techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (03) W405-W411
77 Clinton JWW, Lynch J, Lippitt S, Matsen FA. 3rd. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty with nonprosthetic glenoid arthroplasty: the ream and run. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 10: 43-52
78 Ball CMGL, Yamaguchi K. Meniscal allograft interposition arthroplasty for the arthritis shoulder: description of a new surgical technique. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 2: 247-254
79 Krishnan SG, Nowinski RJ, Harrison D, Burkhead WZ. Humeral hemiarthroplasty with biologic resurfacing of the glenoid for glenohumeral arthritis. Two to fifteen-year outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (04) 727-734
80 Nicholson GP, Goldstein JL, Romeo AA. , et al. Lateral meniscus allograft biologic glenoid arthroplasty in total shoulder arthroplasty for young shoulders with degenerative joint disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16 (5, Suppl): S261-S266
81 Strauss EJ, Verma NN, Salata MJ. , et al. The high failure rate of biologic resurfacing of the glenoid in young patients with glenohumeral arthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23 (03) 409-419