Endoscopy 2019; 51(04): S185
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681717
ESGE Days 2019 ePoster podium presentations
Saturday, April 6, 2019 13:30 – 14:00: ERCP cannulation 1 ePoster Podium 3
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

IS THERE AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE MAJOR PAPILLA MORPHOLOGY AND THE SIZE OF THE TERMINAL COMMON BILE DUCT? – A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

J Fernandes
1   Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santa Luzia, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
2   Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Cova da Beira, Covilhã, Portugal
,
M Moreira
1   Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santa Luzia, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
,
T Araújo
1   Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santa Luzia, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
,
I Costa
3   Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
,
J Fonseca
4   ICVS/3B's – PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
,
H Ribeiro
1   Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santa Luzia, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
,
S Giestas
1   Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santa Luzia, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
,
F Lucas
5   Serviço de Medicina do Hospital de Cascais, Cascais, Portugal
,
D Libânio
1   Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santa Luzia, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
6   Gastroenterology, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
D Martinez-Ares
1   Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santa Luzia, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
,
G Alexandrino
7   Gastroenterology, Hospital Amadora Sinta, Amadora, Portugal
,
D Horta
7   Gastroenterology, Hospital Amadora Sinta, Amadora, Portugal
,
L Lourenço
7   Gastroenterology, Hospital Amadora Sinta, Amadora, Portugal
,
J Reis
7   Gastroenterology, Hospital Amadora Sinta, Amadora, Portugal
,
J Ramada
1   Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santa Luzia, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
,
M Certo
8   Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
,
J Canena
7   Gastroenterology, Hospital Amadora Sinta, Amadora, Portugal
9   Gastroenterology, Nova Medical School/FCML da UNL, Lisbon, Portugal
,
L Lopes
1   Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santa Luzia, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
3   Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
4   ICVS/3B's – PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 March 2019 (online)

 

Aims:

In endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), the risk of adverse events during precut is increased when the terminal bile duct (tBD) is not dilated. Some studies suggest that the major papilla morphology, particularly its width is determined by the prominence of the supra- and intra-duodenal portion of the tBD. The study aim was to assess if the terminal bile duct diameter can be determined by inspecting the major papilla morphology/width during duodenoscopy.

Methods:

Between July 2017 and January 2018, in 3 hospitals, all consecutive patients with naïve papilla referred for ERCP were eligible for enrollment. The transverse diameter (tD) of the papilla was measured using a comparative measurement technique (biopsy forceps) and a novel software (validity and reliability tested). The papilla morphology was classified into one of 4 groups: non-proeminent, proeminent, bulging, distorted. The tBD's diameter was measured in the distal 1 cm (cholangiogram acquired in supine/prone) in a workstation, by an independent researcher. Main outcome was evaluated using a Pearson correlation.

Results:

137 patients were included; 57 males (41.61%), median age of 78 years (26 – 99). The median tD of the papilla was 6 mm (IQR = 3 mm) and the median tBD's diameter was 8.07 mm (IQR = 4.87 mm). Half (50%) of the papillas were non-proeminent (tBD median = 7.66 mm; IQR = 4.473), 32.08% proeminent (tBD median = 8.05 mm; IQR = 4.869), 12.26% bulging (tBD median = 8.978 mm; IQR = 5.814) and 5.66% distorted (tBD median = 7.533 mm; IQR = 0.832); p-value [C2 = 2.237)] > 0.6923. The correlation between tD and tBD diameters was 0.0245.

Conclusions:

Despite what is suggested in the literature, the morphology and the width of the major papilla don't have any association with the diameter of the tBD, and consequently these two dimensions should not be taken into account when deciding for a cannulation technique.