Endoscopy 2019; 51(04): S176-S177
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681692
ESGE Days 2019 ePoster podium presentations
Saturday, April 6, 2019 13:00 – 13:30: Colon: resection 4 ePoster Podium 2
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

ENDOCUFF VISION ASSISTED VERSUS STANDARD POLYP RESECTION IN THE COLORECTUM: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY (EVASTA STUDY)

M Hasenöhrl
1   Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
,
G von Figura
2   Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
,
B Haller
3   Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Statistik und Epidemiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
,
M Abdelhafez
2   Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
,
C Schlag
2   Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
,
RM Schmid
2   Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
,
S von Delius
4   Medizinische Klinik II, RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Rosenheim, Germany
,
P Klare
5   Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 March 2019 (online)

 

Aims:

Cap assisted colonoscopy (CAC) is frequently used in order to facilitate adenoma detection during endoscopy. However, data on how cap assistance influences resection of polyps is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a cap assistance (Endocuff vision device, EVD) on the resection time of colorectal polyps in patients undergoing routine colonoscopy.

Methods:

A randomized, prospective trial in a university hospital in Germany was performed. A total of 250 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either a colonscopy with the EVD (EVD arm) or standard colonoscopy without the use of a cap (standard arm). Primary outcome was duration of polypectomy. Secondary outcomes were adenoma detection rate, cecum and ileum intubation time, procedural complications, patient satisfaction, and propofol dosage.

Results:

The usage of an EVD led to a significant reduction of the polypectomy time (81 vs. 54 seconds in standard vs. EVD arm; p = 0.001). The polyp and adenoma detection rate did not differ between both study groups. Endocuff assistance also resulted in a shorter cecum intubation time compared to the standard group (7.4 vs. 9.6 minutes; p = 0.04). In contrast, no difference in withdrawal time or total colonoscopy duration was observed.

Conclusions:

Endocuff vision assisted colonoscopy reduces duration of polypectomy. The observed effect is assuemd to be due to stable scope positions during resection. Further studies should investigate whether comparable effects can be considered with respect to other interventions such as clipping or biopsy sampling.