Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Weighing the Accomplishments, Hype, and Promise

Summary

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) research is now 50 years old, having made great progress that has tracked the corresponding evolution of computer science, hardware technology, communications, and biomedicine. Characterized as being in its “adolescence” at an international meeting in 1991, and as “coming of age” at another meeting in 2007, the AIM field is now more visible and influential than ever before, paralleling the enthusiasm and accomplishments of artificial intelligence (AI) more generally.

Objectives: This article summarizes some of that AIM history, providing an update on the status of the field as it enters its second half-century. It acknowledges the failure of AI, including AIM, to live up to early predictions of its likely capabilities and impact.

Methods: The paper reviews and assesses the early history of the AIM field, referring to the conclusions of papers based on the meetings in 1991 and 2007, and analyzing the subsequent evolution of AIM.

Conclusion: We must be cautious in assessing the speed at which further progress will be made, despite today’s wild predictions in the press and large investments by industry, including in health care. The inherent complexity of medicine and of clinical care necessitates that we address issues of usability, workflow, transparency, safety, and formal clinical trials. These requirements contribute to an ongoing research agenda that means academic AIM research will continue to be vibrant while having new opportunities for more interactions with industry.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence - machine learning - decision-support systems - history of artificial intelligence in medicine

• References

• 1 Topol EJ. Hi-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 2019; 25: 44-56
• 2 Shortliffe EH. The adolescence of AI in Medicine: Will the field come of age in the 90s?. Artif Intell Med 1993; 5: 93-106
• 3 Patel VL, Shortliffe EH, Stefanelli M, Szolovits P, Berthold MR, Bellazzi R. et al. The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicine. Artif Intell Med 2009; 46: 5-17
• 4 Buchanan BG, Sutherland G, Feigenbaum E. Heuristic DENDRAL: A program for generating explanatory hypotheses in organic chemistry. In: Meltzer B, Michie D. editors Machine Intelligence 4. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh Univ Press; 1969. P. 209-54
• 5 Sridharan NS. (guest editor) Special issue on artificial intelligence in medicine. Artif Intell 1978; 11: 1
• 6 Clancey WJ, Shortliffe EH. Readings in Medical Artificial Intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1984. Available online at http://www.shortliffe.net/Clancey-Shortliffe-1984/Readings%20Book.htm . (Accessed Feb 10 2019)
• 7 Freiherr G. The seeds of artificial intelligence: SUMEX-AIM. US GPO; DHEW publication no. (NIIH) 80-2071. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health; 1980. Available online at https://exhibits.stanford.edu/feigenbaum/catalog/kd321pr5751 . (Accessed Feb 10 2019)
• 8 Shortliffe EH. Computer-Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. New York: American Elsevier; 1976. Available online at http://www.shortliffe.net/Shortliffe-1976/MYCIN%20thesis%20Book.htm . (Accessed Feb 10 2019)
• 9 Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH. Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1984. Available online at https://aitopics.org/misc/rule-based-expert-systems-mycin-experiments-stanford-heuristic-programming-project . (Accessed Feb 10 2019)
• 10 Herzenberg L, Rindfleisch TC, Herzenberg L. Joshua Lederberg: The Stanford Years (1958-1978). Annu Rev Genet 2008; 42: 19-25
• 11 Ohno-Machado L.. Research on machine learning issues in biomedical informatics modeling (editorial for special issue). J Biomed Inform 2004; 37: 221-3
• 12 Ohno-Machado L. Clinical machine learning (editorial for special issue). J Biomed Inform 2005; 38: 345-6
• 13 Markoff J. Computer wins on ‘Jeopardy’: Trivial, it’s not. The New York Times, February 11, 2011. Available online at https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/science/17jeopardy-watson.html (Accessed Feb 12 2019)
• 14 Minsky M, Papert S. Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1987. (originally published in 1969)
• 15 Reddy DR, Erman LD, Fennell RO, Neely RB. The hearsay speech understanding system: An example of the recognition process. Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 1973. p. 185-93
• 16 Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ. editors. Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. London: Springer; 2014
• 17 Hinton G. Deep learning—a technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA 2018; 320 (11) 1101-2
• 18 Liang H, Tsui BY, Ni H, Valentim CCS, Baxter SL, Liu G, Cai W. et al. Evaluation and accurate diagnoses of pediatric diseases using artificial intelligence. Nat Med 2019 Feb 11. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0335-9
• 19 Khullar D. A.I. Could Worsen Health Disparities. The New York Times, January 31, 2019. Available online at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/ai-bias-healthcare.html . (Accessed Feb 13 2019)
• 20 Marcus G. Artificial Intelligence is Stuck. Here’s How to Move it Forward. The New York Times, July 29, 2017. Available online at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/29/opinion/sunday/artificial-intelligence-is-stuck-heres-how-to-move-it-forward.html . (Accessed Feb 13 2019)
• 21 Mayo RC, Leung J. Artificial intelligence and deep learning – Radiology’s next frontier?. Clin Imaging 2018; 49: 87-88
• 22 Ko SY, Lee JH, Yoon JH, Na H, Hong E, Han K. et al. A deep convolutional neural network for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules on ultrasound. Head Neck 2019 Feb 4. doi: 10.1002/hed.25415
• 23 Ting DSW, Cheung CY, Lim G, Tan GSW, Quang ND, Gan A. et al. Development and validation of a deep learning system for diabetic retinopathy and related eye diseases using retinal images from multiethnic populations with diabetes. JAMA 2017; Dec 12 318 (22) 2211-23
• 24 Han SS, Kim MS, Lim W, Park GH, Park I, Chang SE. Classification of the clinical images for benign and malignant cutaneous tumors using a deep learning algorithm. J Invest Dermatol 2018; Jul; 138 (07) 1529-38
• 25 Smith KP, Kang AD, Kirby JE. Automated interpretation of blood clulture gram stains by use of a deep convolutional neural network. J Clin Microbiol 2018; 56: 3
• 26 Shortliffe EH, Sepúlveda MJ. Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence. JAMA 2018; 320 (21) 2199-200
• 27 Hendler J, Feigenbaum EA. Knowledge is Power: The Semantic Web Vision. In: Zhong N, Yao Y, Liu J, Ohsuga S. editors. Web Intelligence: Research and Development: WI 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2198 Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2001