J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2019; 80(04): 291-301
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677825
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Practical Aspects and Avoidance of Complications in Microendoscopic Spine Surgeries: A Review

Yad Ram Yadav
1   Department of Neurosurgery, NSCB Medical College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Angelo Lucano
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital S. Croce and Carle Cuneo, Carle Cuneo, Italy
,
Shailendra Ratre
1   Department of Neurosurgery, NSCB Medical College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Vijay Singh Parihar
1   Department of Neurosurgery, NSCB Medical College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 May 2018

19 November 2018

Publication Date:
09 April 2019 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Although the indications for endoscopic procedures have increased in recent times, there are also some limitations. This review discusses the practical points to prevent and treat complications in microendoscopic spine surgery.

Material and Methods A literature search was conducted for the relevant articles after a topic search on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Medline. The review is based on the experience of 1,574 spinal endoscopic procedures performed by the senior author.

Results Advantages of endoscopic surgery include better visualization, panoramic vision, and the ability to work around corners. Limitations with endoscopic procedures include proximal blind areas, obstruction in instrument handling due to a narrow corridor, disorientation, frequent lens fogging, loss of depth perception, and difficulty in achieving hemostasis, leading to complications and longer operative time during the learning curve.

Conclusion Surgeons need to learn endoscopic skills in addition to microsurgical ones to perform microendoscopic procedures properly. Attending live workshops, watching operative videos, visiting various departments, watching an experienced and accomplished endoscopic surgeon, proper case selection, a multidisciplinary team approach, practicing on models, hands-on cadaveric workshops, laboratory training, and simulators can improve results and shorten the learning curve.

 
  • References

  • 1 Yadav YR, Madhariya SN, Parihar VS, Namdev H, Bhatele PR. Endoscopic transoral excision of odontoid process in irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: our experience of 34 patients. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013; 74 (03) 162-167
  • 2 Yadav YR, Parihar V, Namdev H, Agarwal M, Bhatele PR. Endoscopic interlaminar management of lumbar disc disease. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013; 74 (02) 77-81
  • 3 Eun SS, Lee SH, Erken HY. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy for downmigrated disk herniations: lever-up, rotate, and tilt technique. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79 (02) 163-168
  • 4 Choi KC, Lee JH, Kim JS, Lee DC, Park CK. Combination of transforaminal and interlaminar percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy for extensive down-migrated disk herniation. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79 (01) 60-65
  • 5 Yadav YR, Parihar V, Pande S, Namdev H. Endoscopic management of colloid cysts. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014; 75 (05) 376-380
  • 6 Hu Z, Guan F, Kang T. , et al. Whole course neuroendoscopic resection of cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77 (05) 381-388
  • 7 Ratre S, Yadav N, Yadav YR, Parihar VS, Bajaj J, Kher Y. Endoscopic management of Arnold-Chiari malformation type 1 with or without syringomyelia. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79 (01) 45-51
  • 8 Cagnazzo F, Zoli M, Mazzatenta D, Gompel JJV. Endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery of craniopharyngiomas: a systematic review of surgical outcomes over two decades. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79 (03) 247-256
  • 9 Marx S, El Damaty A, Manwaring J. , et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy before posterior fossa tumor surgery in adult patients. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79 (02) 123-129
  • 10 Jackson C, Gallia GL, Chaichana KL. Minimally invasive biopsies of deep-seated brain lesions using tubular retractors under exoscopic visualization. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017; 78 (06) 588-594
  • 11 Komatsu F, Imai M, Hirayama A. , et al. Endoscopic microvascular decompression with transposition for trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm: technical note. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017; 78 (03) 291-295
  • 12 Dubey A, Yadav N, Ratre S, Parihar VS, Yadav YR. Full endoscopic vascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia: experience of 230 patients. World Neurosurg 2018; 113: e612-e617
  • 13 Idris Z, Tan YC, Kandasamy R, Ghani RI, Abdullah JM. Transfrontal transaqueductal, transtrigonal, and suboccipital infratentorial supracerebellar endoscopic fenestration of posterior fossa arachnoid cysts: three surgical cases. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017; 78 (02) 210-215
  • 14 Chowdhry SA, Cohen AR. Intraventricular neuroendoscopy: complication avoidance and management. World Neurosurg 2013; 79 (2, Suppl): 15.e1-15.e10
  • 15 Yadav YR, Parihar V, Kher Y. Complication avoidance and its management in endoscopic neurosurgery. Neurol India 2013; 61 (03) 217-225
  • 16 Yadav YR, Parihar VS, Ratre S, Kher Y. Avoiding complications in endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2015; 76 (06) 483-494
  • 17 Yadav YR, Bajaj J, Parihar V, Ratre S, Pateriya A. Practical aspects of neuroendoscopic techniques and complication avoidance: a systematic review. Turk Neurosurg 2018; 28 (03) 329-340
  • 18 Yadav YR, Parihar V, Ratre S, Kher Y, Iqbal M. Microneurosurgical skills training. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77 (02) 146-154
  • 19 Yadav YR, Ratre S, Parihar V, Dubey A, Dubey MN. Endoscopic partial corpectomy using anterior decompression for cervical myelopathy. Neurol India 2018; 66 (02) 444-451
  • 20 Yadav YR, Parihar V, Ratre S, Kher Y. Endoscopic anterior decompression in cervical disc disease. Neurol India 2014; 62 (04) 417-422
  • 21 Yadav YR, Parihar V, Agarwal M, Sherekar S, Bhatele P. Endoscopic vascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2011; 54 (03) 110-114
  • 22 Parihar VS, Yadav N, Yadav YR, Ratre S, Bajaj J, Kher Y. Endoscopic management of spinal intradural extra-medullary tumors. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017; 78 (03) 219-226
  • 23 Yadav YR, Parihar V, Ratre S, Kher Y, Bhatele PR. Endoscopic decompression of cervical spondylotic myelopathy using posterior approach. Neurol India 2014; 62 (06) 640-645
  • 24 Hsu HT, Chang SJ, Yang SS, Chai CL. Learning curve of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (04) 727-733
  • 25 Ahn SS, Kim SH, Kim DW. Learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy based on the period (early vs. late) and technique (in-and-out vs. in-and-out-and-in): a retrospective comparative study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2015; 58 (06) 539-546
  • 26 Morgenstern R, Morgenstern C, Yeung AT. The learning curve in foraminal endoscopic discectomy: experience needed to achieve a 90% success rate. SAS J 2007; 1 (03) 100-107
  • 27 Wang H, Huang B, Li C. , et al. Learning curve for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy depending on the surgeon's training level of minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115 (10) 1987-1991
  • 28 Jhala A, Mistry M. Endoscopic lumbar discectomy: experience of first 100 cases. Indian J Orthop 2010; 44 (02) 184-190
  • 29 Nomura K, Yoshida M. Assessment of the learning curve for microendoscopic decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis through an analysis of 480 cases involving a single surgeon. Global Spine J 2017; 7 (01) 54-58
  • 30 Kim E-H, Sihn D-H, Cha J-S, Jae Y-B. Factors affecting learning curve in endoscopic lumbar discectomy using interlaminar approach. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 2006; 13 (04) 311-318
  • 31 Martín-Láez R, Martínez-Agüeros JA, Suárez-Fernández D, Montiaga-Núñez F, Vázquez-Barquero A. Complications of endoscopic microdiscectomy using the EASYGO! system: is there any difference with conventional discectomy during the learning-curve period?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154 (06) 1023-1032
  • 32 Joswig H, Richter H, Haile SR, Hildebrandt G, Fournier JY. Introducing interlaminar full-endoscopic lumbar diskectomy: a critical analysis of complications, recurrence rates, and outcome in view of two spinal surgeons' learning curves. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77 (05) 406-415
  • 33 Yeung AT, Roberts A, Shin P, Rivers E, Paterson A. Suggestions for a practical and progressive approach to endoscopic spine surgery training and privileges. J Spine 2018; 7: 414
  • 34 Yadav YR, Yadav N, Parihar V, Kher Y, Ratre S. Endoscopic posterior decompression of lumbar canal stenosis. Indian J Neurosurg 2013; 2: 124-130
  • 35 Kim HS, Paudel B, Jang JS. , et al. Percutaneous full endoscopic bilateral lumbar decompression of spinal stenosis through uniportal-contralateral approach: techniques and preliminary results. World Neurosurg 2017; 103: 201-209
  • 36 Anichini G, Landi A, Caporlingua F. , et al. Lumbar endoscopic microdiscectomy: where are we now? an updated literature review focused on clinical outcome, complcations, and rate of recurrence. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 417801
  • 37 Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Hosogane N. , et al. Recurrence of lumbar disc herniation after microendoscopic discectomy. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013; 74 (04) 222-227
  • 38 Kulkarni AG, Bassi A, Dhruv A. Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: technique and results of 188 cases. Indian J Orthop 2014; 48 (01) 81-87
  • 39 Sencer A, Yorukoglu AG, Akcakaya MO. , et al. Fully endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy: short-term clinical results of 163 surgically treated patients. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (05) 884-890
  • 40 Choi KC, Kim JS, Ryu KS, Kang BU, Ahn Y, Lee SH. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation: transforaminal versus interlaminar approach. Pain Physician 2013; 16 (06) 547-556
  • 41 Phan K, Mobbs RJ. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist. J Spine Surg 2015; 1 (01) 19-27
  • 42 Park Y, Seok S-O, Lee S-B, Ha J-W. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion is more effective than open fusion: a meta-analysis. Yonsei Med J 2018; 59 (04) 524-538
  • 43 Dewanngan NK, Yadav YR, Parihar VS, Ratre S, Kher Y, Bhatele P. Extent of decompression of lumbar spinal canal after endoscopic surgery. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017; 78 (06) 541-547
  • 44 Indo M, Tsutsumi K, Shin M. The practice of knots untying technique using a 10-0 nylon suture and gauze to cope with technical difficulties of microvascular anastomosis. World Neurosurg 2011; 75 (01) 87-89
  • 45 Gasco J, Patel A, Luciano C. , et al. A novel virtual reality simulation for hemostasis in a brain surgical cavity: perceived utility for visuomotor skills in current and aspiring neurosurgery residents. World Neurosurg 2013; 80 (06) 732-737
  • 46 Choudhury N, Gélinas-Phaneuf N, Delorme S, Del Maestro R. Fundamentals of neurosurgery: virtual reality tasks for training and evaluation of technical skills. World Neurosurg 2013; 80 (05) e9-e19
  • 47 Bajaj J, Yadav YR, Pateriya A, Parihar V, Ratre S, Dubey A. Indigenous inexpensive practice models for skill development in neuroendoscopy. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2017; 8 (02) 170-173
  • 48 Espinoza DL, González Carranza V, Chico-Ponce de León F, Martinez AM. PsT1: A low-cost optical simulator for psycho- motor skills training in neuroendoscopy. World Neurosurg 2015; 83 (06) 1074-1079
  • 49 Parihar V, Yadav YR, Kher Y, Ratre S, Sethi A, Sharma D. Learning neuroendoscopy with an exoscope system (video telescopic operating monitor): early clinical results. Asian J Neurosurg 2016; 11 (04) 421-426