Wideband Tympanometry

Abstract

Traditional tympanometry done with 226 Hz probe tone frequency has some inherent defects and limitations due to which it does not give a very true picture of the middle ear status, and tympanometric findings are often very deceptive. It is not uncommon for otologists to find that on opening the middle ear, the pathology in the middle ear is very different from what they had expected from tympanometric findings. This is because the 226 or 220 Hz, that is used for the traditional single tone tympanometry is based on physical convenience, i.e., practicalities in carrying out the test rather than on test performance, i.e., the diagnostic efficacy of the test. The 226 Hz tympanometry is a poor predictor of middle ear effusions in babies and will be wrong in approximately 50% of cases and diagnosis of ossicular chain discontinuity by type A tympanogram is correct in only about 40% cases, if not lesser. In most cases of otosclerosis, though there is a middle ear stiffness, the tympanometric findings with traditional tympanometry show normal compliance, which is not expected in stiffness of the middle ear. Tympanometry is basically to identify common middle ear pathologies, such as middle ear effusion, ossicular chain discontinuity and otosclerosis. However, if in these very cases the diagnostic efficacy is so poor, then the objective of the test is lost. Traditional tympanometry has a lot of limitations and fallacies. These issues led scientists to sharpen the diagnostic efficacy of tympanometry and the final outcome of the research is wide band tympanometry (WBT). The special advantages of WBT, its difference from traditional single frequency tympanometry, and its clinical utility are presented in this article. Here, we review the concept of WBT, the basic mechanism, and its vast clinical applications. Most of the deficiencies of traditional tympanometry have been overcome by WBT. Not only that, the scope of tympanometry has been further widened by WBT and in addition to diagnosing middle ear pathologies with much more confidence, it can also be used for postoperative monitoring using non-pressurized wideband absorbance.

Keywords

middle ear - traditional tympanometry - wideband tympanometry

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
04. Januar 2019 (online)

• Suggested Readings

• 1 Aithal S, Aithal V, Kei J. Effect of ear canal pressure and age on wideband absorbance in young infants. Int J Audiol 2017; 56 (05) 346-355
• 2 Aithal S, Aithal V, Kei J, Andreson S. Comparison of pressurised and non-pressurised wideband absorbance in children with and without middle ear effusion. 2016
• 3 Baldwin M. Choice of probe tone and classification of trace patterns in tympanometry undertaken in early infancy. Int J Audiol 2006; 45 (07) 417-427
• 4 Beers AN, Shahnaz N, Westerberg BD, Kozak FK. Wideband reflectance in normal Caucasian and Chinese school-aged children and in children with otitis media with effusion. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (02) 221-233
• 5 Biswas A. Impedance audiometry. In: Clinical Audiovestibulometry 5th ed Mumbai, India: Bhalani Medical Book House; 2017: 110-113
• 6 Expand your knowledge. Available at: www.Interacoustics.com/academy
• 7 Merchant GR, Röösli C, Niesten MEF. et al. Power reflectance as a screening tool for the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. otology & neurotology: Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society. Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 2015; 36 (01) 172-177
• 8 Polat Z, Baş B, Hayır D, Bulut E, Ataş A. Wideband tympanometry normative data for Turkish young adult population. J Int Adv Otol 2015; 11 (02) 157-162
• 9 Clinical applications of wideband tympanometry. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2017; 60 (08) 375-380
• 10 Liu YW, Sanford CA, Ellison JC, Fitzpatrick DF, Gorga MP, Keefe DH. Wideband absorbance tympanometry using pressure sweeps: system development and results on adults with normal hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008;124(6). doi: 10.1121/1.3001712